Kristen M Stewart, Glenn K Klute, Richard R Neptune
{"title":"Influence of Walking Over Unexpected Uneven Terrain on Joint Loading for Individuals With Transtibial Amputation.","authors":"Kristen M Stewart, Glenn K Klute, Richard R Neptune","doi":"10.1115/1.4065045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) experience asymmetric lower-limb loading which can lead to joint pain and injuries. However, it is unclear how walking over unexpected uneven terrain affects their loading patterns. This study sought to use modeling and simulation to determine how peak joint contact forces and impulses change for individuals with unilateral TTA during an uneven step and subsequent recovery step and how those patterns compare to able-bodied individuals. We expected residual limb loading during the uneven step and intact limb loading during the recovery step would increase relative to flush walking. Further, individuals with TTA would experience larger loading increases compared to able-bodied individuals. Simulations of individuals with TTA showed during the uneven step, changes in joint loading occurred at all joints except the prosthetic ankle relative to flush walking. During the recovery step, intact limb joint loading increased in early stance relative to flush walking. Simulations of able-bodied individuals showed large increases in ankle joint loading for both surface conditions. Overall, increases in early stance knee joint loading were larger for those with TTA compared to able-bodied individuals during both steps. These results suggest that individuals with TTA experience altered joint loading patterns when stepping on uneven terrain. Future work should investigate whether an adapting ankle-foot prosthesis can mitigate these changes to reduce injury risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) experience asymmetric lower-limb loading which can lead to joint pain and injuries. However, it is unclear how walking over unexpected uneven terrain affects their loading patterns. This study sought to use modeling and simulation to determine how peak joint contact forces and impulses change for individuals with unilateral TTA during an uneven step and subsequent recovery step and how those patterns compare to able-bodied individuals. We expected residual limb loading during the uneven step and intact limb loading during the recovery step would increase relative to flush walking. Further, individuals with TTA would experience larger loading increases compared to able-bodied individuals. Simulations of individuals with TTA showed during the uneven step, changes in joint loading occurred at all joints except the prosthetic ankle relative to flush walking. During the recovery step, intact limb joint loading increased in early stance relative to flush walking. Simulations of able-bodied individuals showed large increases in ankle joint loading for both surface conditions. Overall, increases in early stance knee joint loading were larger for those with TTA compared to able-bodied individuals during both steps. These results suggest that individuals with TTA experience altered joint loading patterns when stepping on uneven terrain. Future work should investigate whether an adapting ankle-foot prosthesis can mitigate these changes to reduce injury risk.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.