Healthcare professionals' experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in pain centres - A qualitative study.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0132
Torunn Hatlen Nøst, Tone Dahl-Michelsen, Hanne Aandahl, Aslak Steinsbekk
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in pain centres - A qualitative study.","authors":"Torunn Hatlen Nøst, Tone Dahl-Michelsen, Hanne Aandahl, Aslak Steinsbekk","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The complexity of chronic pain requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Although this is recognisable in the framework for pain centres, few studies have investigated how interdisciplinary collaboration in pain centres is experienced by healthcare professionals, including the facilitators and barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of patients with chronic pain among healthcare professionals in tertiary care pain centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven healthcare professionals, representing different healthcare disciplines from the four regional pain centres in Norway, participated in semi-structured individual interviews. The data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were categorised into three themes '<i>The best approach for chronic pain treatment'</i>, '<i>Collegial collaboration'</i>, and '<i>Challenges with interdisciplinary teamwork'.</i> The informants valued the interdisciplinary work at the pain centre. They perceived it as the best approach for their patients and appreciated the support the collegial collaboration gave them as professionals. Although working together was rewarding and provided new insights, the informants also experienced the interdisciplinary teamwork as challenging, e.g., when the different professions disagreed on recommendations for further treatment or did not manage to work together as a team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The informants found the interdisciplinary collaboration at the pain centre to provide the best treatment approach for their patients. It should be acknowledged that interdisciplinary teamwork can be challenging, and efforts should be put into establishing a good climate for collaboration and gaining knowledge about each profession's unique character and how they contribute to pain centre treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The complexity of chronic pain requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Although this is recognisable in the framework for pain centres, few studies have investigated how interdisciplinary collaboration in pain centres is experienced by healthcare professionals, including the facilitators and barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of patients with chronic pain among healthcare professionals in tertiary care pain centres.

Methods: Eleven healthcare professionals, representing different healthcare disciplines from the four regional pain centres in Norway, participated in semi-structured individual interviews. The data were analysed thematically.

Results: The results were categorised into three themes 'The best approach for chronic pain treatment', 'Collegial collaboration', and 'Challenges with interdisciplinary teamwork'. The informants valued the interdisciplinary work at the pain centre. They perceived it as the best approach for their patients and appreciated the support the collegial collaboration gave them as professionals. Although working together was rewarding and provided new insights, the informants also experienced the interdisciplinary teamwork as challenging, e.g., when the different professions disagreed on recommendations for further treatment or did not manage to work together as a team.

Conclusion: The informants found the interdisciplinary collaboration at the pain centre to provide the best treatment approach for their patients. It should be acknowledged that interdisciplinary teamwork can be challenging, and efforts should be put into establishing a good climate for collaboration and gaining knowledge about each profession's unique character and how they contribute to pain centre treatments.

医护人员在疼痛中心开展跨学科合作的经验--一项定性研究。
目标:慢性疼痛的复杂性要求跨学科合作。虽然这在疼痛中心的框架中已经得到认可,但很少有研究调查过医护人员如何体验疼痛中心的跨学科合作,包括跨学科合作的促进因素和障碍。因此,本研究旨在调查三级医疗疼痛中心的医护人员在治疗慢性疼痛患者过程中的跨学科合作经验:来自挪威四个地区疼痛中心、代表不同医疗学科的11名医护人员参加了半结构化个人访谈。对数据进行了专题分析:访谈结果分为三个主题:"慢性疼痛治疗的最佳方法"、"同事间的合作 "和 "跨学科团队合作面临的挑战"。信息提供者非常重视疼痛中心的跨学科工作。他们认为这是对病人最好的治疗方法,并感谢跨学科合作为他们提供的专业支持。虽然跨学科团队合作让他们受益匪浅,并为他们提供了新的见解,但他们也感受到了跨学科团队合作的挑战性,例如,当不同的专业人员在进一步治疗的建议上产生分歧或无法作为一个团队合作时:信息提供者认为疼痛中心的跨学科合作为病人提供了最佳治疗方法。应该承认,跨学科团队合作可能具有挑战性,应努力营造良好的合作氛围,了解各专业的独特性以及他们如何为疼痛中心的治疗做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信