Intraocular pressure profile following selective laser trabeculoplasty in pigmentary and primary open-angle glaucoma.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1177/11206721241237305
Shahin Hallaj, Sapna Sinha, Nikki A Mehran, Amber M Morrill, Michael J Pro, Elizabeth Dale, Courtland Schmidt, Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer, Aakriti G Shukla, Daniel Lee, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, L Jay Katz, Reza Razeghinejad
{"title":"Intraocular pressure profile following selective laser trabeculoplasty in pigmentary and primary open-angle glaucoma.","authors":"Shahin Hallaj, Sapna Sinha, Nikki A Mehran, Amber M Morrill, Michael J Pro, Elizabeth Dale, Courtland Schmidt, Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer, Aakriti G Shukla, Daniel Lee, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, L Jay Katz, Reza Razeghinejad","doi":"10.1177/11206721241237305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) profile and the incidence of IOP spikes following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) between pigmentary glaucoma (PG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative study of 65 PG eyes of 51 patients matched with 65 POAG eyes of 65 patients who received SLT. Matching was done based on age, gender, glaucoma severity, pre-laser IOP, and number of medications. Post-SLT IOP spike was defined as IOP elevation ≥5mmHg, 30-45 min after the laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PG and POAG groups, the average age was 62.33 ± 9.18 and 62.58 ± 9.19 years (p = 0.95). The glaucoma severity (p = 0.708), baseline IOP (PG = 21.61 ± 1.34mmHg vs. POAG = 21.13 ± 5.09mmHg, p = 0.943), and number of topical glaucoma medications(PG = 2.34 ± 1.34 vs. POAG = 2.1 ± 1.41, p = 0.342) were comparable. More PG patients were on oral acetazolamide (PG = 26.15% vs. POAG = 1.5%, p < 0.001). Average logMAR visual acuity was significantly higher in the POAG group (0.207 ± 0.3 vs. 0.192 ± 0.37, p = 0.012). Eyes with PG received lower laser energy (POAG = 63.65 ± 22.03 mJ vs. PG = 43.71 ± 25.68 mJ, p < 0.001). IOP spikes were recorded in 5 PG eyes (7.6%) and none in the POAG group (p = 0.058). Failure rates were similar (PG = 50.7% and POAG = 43.1%, p = 0.205). In multivariable analysis, only pre-laser IOP (coefficient = 2.154 [CI: 0.765-3.543], p = 0.003) was a significant predictor of IOP change percentage after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SLT was comparably effective in both PG and POAG. IOP spikes were observed only in the PG group, though the total laser energy was lower in this group compared with POAG.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241237305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) profile and the incidence of IOP spikes following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) between pigmentary glaucoma (PG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Materials and methods: Retrospective comparative study of 65 PG eyes of 51 patients matched with 65 POAG eyes of 65 patients who received SLT. Matching was done based on age, gender, glaucoma severity, pre-laser IOP, and number of medications. Post-SLT IOP spike was defined as IOP elevation ≥5mmHg, 30-45 min after the laser.

Results: In PG and POAG groups, the average age was 62.33 ± 9.18 and 62.58 ± 9.19 years (p = 0.95). The glaucoma severity (p = 0.708), baseline IOP (PG = 21.61 ± 1.34mmHg vs. POAG = 21.13 ± 5.09mmHg, p = 0.943), and number of topical glaucoma medications(PG = 2.34 ± 1.34 vs. POAG = 2.1 ± 1.41, p = 0.342) were comparable. More PG patients were on oral acetazolamide (PG = 26.15% vs. POAG = 1.5%, p < 0.001). Average logMAR visual acuity was significantly higher in the POAG group (0.207 ± 0.3 vs. 0.192 ± 0.37, p = 0.012). Eyes with PG received lower laser energy (POAG = 63.65 ± 22.03 mJ vs. PG = 43.71 ± 25.68 mJ, p < 0.001). IOP spikes were recorded in 5 PG eyes (7.6%) and none in the POAG group (p = 0.058). Failure rates were similar (PG = 50.7% and POAG = 43.1%, p = 0.205). In multivariable analysis, only pre-laser IOP (coefficient = 2.154 [CI: 0.765-3.543], p = 0.003) was a significant predictor of IOP change percentage after 12 months.

Conclusions: SLT was comparably effective in both PG and POAG. IOP spikes were observed only in the PG group, though the total laser energy was lower in this group compared with POAG.

色素性和原发性开角型青光眼选择性激光小梁成形术后的眼压曲线。
目的:比较色素性青光眼(PG)和原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)在选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)后的眼压(IOP)曲线和眼压峰值的发生率:对 51 名患者的 65 只 PG 眼睛和 65 名接受 SLT 的 POAG 眼睛进行回顾性比较研究。根据年龄、性别、青光眼严重程度、激光前眼压和用药次数进行配对。SLT后眼压峰值的定义是激光后30-45分钟内眼压升高≥5mmHg:PG组和POAG组的平均年龄分别为(62.33±9.18)岁和(62.58±9.19)岁(P = 0.95)。青光眼严重程度(p = 0.708)、基线眼压(PG = 21.61 ± 1.34mmHg vs. POAG = 21.13 ± 5.09mmHg,p = 0.943)和青光眼局部用药次数(PG = 2.34 ± 1.34 vs. POAG = 2.1 ± 1.41,p = 0.342)相当。更多的 PG 患者口服乙酰唑胺(PG = 26.15% vs. POAG = 1.5%,p 结论:POAG 患者口服乙酰唑胺的比例较高,而 PG 患者口服乙酰唑胺的比例较低:SLT对PG和POAG的疗效相当。仅在 PG 组观察到眼压峰值,尽管该组的激光总能量低于 POAG 组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信