Safety and Effectiveness Analysis of Different Surgical Methods for Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Guanyin Li, Yu Yang, Yueyu Qu, Ankang Wang, Zhenxing He, Yong Peng
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness Analysis of Different Surgical Methods for Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones.","authors":"Guanyin Li, Yu Yang, Yueyu Qu, Ankang Wang, Zhenxing He, Yong Peng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrahepatic bile duct stones, a prevalent condition within hepato-biliary diseases, present a considerable challenge due to the high rates of recurrence, complications, and difficulty in treatment. Selecting an optimal surgical approach is vital for effective stone clearance and minimizing patient morbidity. While laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy are established modalities, their comparative efficacy and safety profiles necessitate further investigation to inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effectiveness and safety of different surgical methods for intrahepatic bile duct stones.  Methods: The clinical data of 65 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones admitted to Nanchong Central Hospital, China, from January 2021 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the differences in surgical methods, patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy were included in the laparoscopic group (n = 33), and patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy were included in the percutaneous transhepatic group (n = 32). The differences in perioperative indicators, inflammatory factors, postoperative complications, and one-year follow-up recurrence rates between the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with percutaneous transhepatic group, laparoscopic group had significantly shorter operation time and hospitalization time (p < 0.05), and significantly higher blood loss (p < 0.05). After the operation, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the laparoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic groups were significantly lower than those in the same group before the operation (p < 0.05). CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than in the percutaneous transhepatic group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and the recurrence rate of one-year follow-up between the laparoscopic group and the percutaneous transhepatic puncture group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy are both practical and safe, and the appropriate surgical scheme should be selected according to the patient's specific condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrahepatic bile duct stones, a prevalent condition within hepato-biliary diseases, present a considerable challenge due to the high rates of recurrence, complications, and difficulty in treatment. Selecting an optimal surgical approach is vital for effective stone clearance and minimizing patient morbidity. While laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy are established modalities, their comparative efficacy and safety profiles necessitate further investigation to inform clinical decision-making.

Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety of different surgical methods for intrahepatic bile duct stones.  Methods: The clinical data of 65 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones admitted to Nanchong Central Hospital, China, from January 2021 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the differences in surgical methods, patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy were included in the laparoscopic group (n = 33), and patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy were included in the percutaneous transhepatic group (n = 32). The differences in perioperative indicators, inflammatory factors, postoperative complications, and one-year follow-up recurrence rates between the two groups were compared.

Results: Compared with percutaneous transhepatic group, laparoscopic group had significantly shorter operation time and hospitalization time (p < 0.05), and significantly higher blood loss (p < 0.05). After the operation, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the laparoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic groups were significantly lower than those in the same group before the operation (p < 0.05). CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than in the percutaneous transhepatic group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and the recurrence rate of one-year follow-up between the laparoscopic group and the percutaneous transhepatic puncture group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy are both practical and safe, and the appropriate surgical scheme should be selected according to the patient's specific condition.

肝内胆管结石不同手术方法的安全性和有效性分析
背景:肝内胆管结石是肝胆疾病中的一种常见病,由于复发率高、并发症多、治疗困难,因此是一项相当大的挑战。选择最佳的手术方法对于有效清除结石和降低患者发病率至关重要。虽然腹腔镜肝切除术和经皮经肝胆道镜检查是已经确立的方法,但有必要对它们的疗效和安全性进行比较研究,以便为临床决策提供依据:探讨不同手术方法治疗肝内胆管结石的有效性和安全性。 方法:回顾性分析南充市中心医院 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月收治的 65 例肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料。根据手术方式的差异,将接受腹腔镜肝切除术的患者纳入腹腔镜组(n=33),将接受经皮经肝胆道镜检查的患者纳入经皮经肝组(n=32)。比较了两组患者围手术期指标、炎症因素、术后并发症和一年随访复发率的差异:结果:与经皮经肝组相比,腹腔镜组的手术时间和住院时间明显缩短(P < 0.05),失血量明显增加(P < 0.05)。术后,腹腔镜组和经皮经肝组的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)均明显低于术前同组(P < 0.05)。腹腔镜组的 CRP、TNF-α 和 IL-6 明显低于经皮经肝组(P < 0.05)。腹腔镜组和经皮经肝穿刺组的术后并发症发生率和随访一年的复发率无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:腹腔镜肝切除术和经皮经肝胆道镜检查既实用又安全,应根据患者的具体情况选择合适的手术方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信