Characterization of renal masses with MRI-based radiomics: assessment of inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility in a prospective pilot study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Haitham Al-Mubarak, Octavia Bane, Nicolas Gillingham, Christopher Kyriakakos, Ghadi Abboud, Jordan Cuevas, Janette Gonzalez, Kirolos Meilika, Amir Horowitz, Hsin-Hui (Vivien) Huang, Jorge Daza, Valentin Fauveau, Ketan Badani, Satish E. Viswanath, Bachir Taouli, Sara Lewis
{"title":"Characterization of renal masses with MRI-based radiomics: assessment of inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility in a prospective pilot study","authors":"Haitham Al-Mubarak,&nbsp;Octavia Bane,&nbsp;Nicolas Gillingham,&nbsp;Christopher Kyriakakos,&nbsp;Ghadi Abboud,&nbsp;Jordan Cuevas,&nbsp;Janette Gonzalez,&nbsp;Kirolos Meilika,&nbsp;Amir Horowitz,&nbsp;Hsin-Hui (Vivien) Huang,&nbsp;Jorge Daza,&nbsp;Valentin Fauveau,&nbsp;Ketan Badani,&nbsp;Satish E. Viswanath,&nbsp;Bachir Taouli,&nbsp;Sara Lewis","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04212-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate radiomics features’ reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carcinomas (RCC)/7 benign masses; mean size, 3.43 ± 1.73 cm) undergoing resection were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent 1.5 T MRI with T2-weighted (T2-WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pre-/post-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI). RMs were manually segmented using volume of interest (VOI) on T2-WI, DWI/ADC, and T1-WI pre-/post-contrast imaging (1-min, 3-min post-injection) by two independent observers using two radiomics software packages for inter-package and inter-observer assessments of shape/histogram/texture features common to both packages (104 features; <i>n</i> = 26 patients). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter-observer and inter-package reproducibility of radiomics measurements [good (ICC ≥ 0.8)/moderate (ICC = 0.5–0.8)/poor (ICC &lt; 0.5)]. ML models were employed using reproducible features (between observers and packages, ICC &gt; 0.8) to distinguish RCC from benign RM.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Inter-package comparisons demonstrated that radiomics features from T1-WI-post-contrast had the highest proportion of good/moderate ICCs (54.8–58.6% for T1-WI-1 min), while most features extracted from T2-WI, T1-WI-pre-contrast, and ADC exhibited poor ICCs. Inter-observer comparisons found that radiomics measurements from T1-WI pre/post-contrast and T2-WI had the greatest proportion of features with good/moderate ICCs (95.3–99.1% T1-WI-post-contrast 1-min), while ADC measurements yielded mostly poor ICCs. ML models generated an AUC of 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.67–0.75] for diagnosis of RCC vs. benign RM.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Radiomics features extracted from T1-WI-post-contrast demonstrated greater inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility compared to ADC, with fair accuracy for distinguishing RCC from benign RM.</p><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>Knowledge of reproducibility of MRI radiomics features obtained on renal masses will aid in future study design and may enhance the diagnostic utility of radiomics models for renal mass characterization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04212-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate radiomics features’ reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization.

Methods

32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carcinomas (RCC)/7 benign masses; mean size, 3.43 ± 1.73 cm) undergoing resection were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent 1.5 T MRI with T2-weighted (T2-WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pre-/post-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI). RMs were manually segmented using volume of interest (VOI) on T2-WI, DWI/ADC, and T1-WI pre-/post-contrast imaging (1-min, 3-min post-injection) by two independent observers using two radiomics software packages for inter-package and inter-observer assessments of shape/histogram/texture features common to both packages (104 features; n = 26 patients). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter-observer and inter-package reproducibility of radiomics measurements [good (ICC ≥ 0.8)/moderate (ICC = 0.5–0.8)/poor (ICC < 0.5)]. ML models were employed using reproducible features (between observers and packages, ICC > 0.8) to distinguish RCC from benign RM.

Results

Inter-package comparisons demonstrated that radiomics features from T1-WI-post-contrast had the highest proportion of good/moderate ICCs (54.8–58.6% for T1-WI-1 min), while most features extracted from T2-WI, T1-WI-pre-contrast, and ADC exhibited poor ICCs. Inter-observer comparisons found that radiomics measurements from T1-WI pre/post-contrast and T2-WI had the greatest proportion of features with good/moderate ICCs (95.3–99.1% T1-WI-post-contrast 1-min), while ADC measurements yielded mostly poor ICCs. ML models generated an AUC of 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.67–0.75] for diagnosis of RCC vs. benign RM.

Conclusion

Radiomics features extracted from T1-WI-post-contrast demonstrated greater inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility compared to ADC, with fair accuracy for distinguishing RCC from benign RM.

Clinical relevance

Knowledge of reproducibility of MRI radiomics features obtained on renal masses will aid in future study design and may enhance the diagnostic utility of radiomics models for renal mass characterization.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

利用基于核磁共振成像的放射组学确定肾肿块的特征:在一项前瞻性试点研究中评估包装间和观察者间的可重复性。
目的:方法:前瞻性招募32例接受肾肿块切除术的肾肿块患者(23男/9女;年龄61.8 ± 10.6岁)(25例肾细胞癌(RCC)/7例良性肿块;平均大小3.43 ± 1.73厘米)。所有患者都接受了 1.5 T MRI,包括 T2 加权(T2-WI)、弥散加权(DWI)/表观弥散系数(ADC)和前后对比增强 T1 加权成像(T1-WI)。由两名独立观察者使用两套放射组学软件包,根据T2-WI、DWI/ADC和T1-WI对比成像前后(注射后1分钟、3分钟)的感兴趣容积(VOI)对RM进行人工分割,以对两套软件包共有的形状/组织图/纹理特征进行软件包间和观察者间评估(104个特征;n = 26名患者)。计算类内相关系数(ICC)以评估放射组学测量的观察者间和软件包间的可重复性[良好(ICC ≥ 0.8)/中等(ICC = 0.5-0.8)/差(ICC 0.8),以区分RCC和良性RM:结果表明,从T1-WI-后对比中提取的放射组学特征的良好/中等ICC比例最高(T1-WI-1分钟为54.8%-58.6%),而从T2-WI、T1-WI-前对比和ADC中提取的大多数特征的ICC较差。观察者之间的比较发现,T1-WI-对比前/后和 T2-WI 的放射组学测量具有良好/中等 ICC 的特征比例最高(T1-WI-对比后 1 分钟为 95.3-99.1%),而 ADC 测量的 ICC 大多较差。在诊断RCC与良性RM时,ML模型产生的AUC为0.71[95%置信区间=0.67-0.75]:结论:与 ADC 相比,从 T1-WI 后对比中提取的放射组学特征显示出更高的组间和观察者间可重复性,在区分 RCC 和良性 RM 方面具有相当高的准确性:了解肾脏肿块核磁共振成像放射组学特征的可重复性有助于未来的研究设计,并可提高放射组学模型在肾脏肿块特征描述中的诊断效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信