Global patterns of allochthony in stream–riparian meta-ecosystems

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1111/ele.14401
Daniel C. Allen, James Larson, Christina A. Murphy, Erica A. Garcia, Kurt E. Anderson, Michelle H. Busch, Alba Argerich, Alice M. Belskis, Kierstyn T. Higgins, Brooke E. Penaluna, Veronica Saenz, Jay Jones, Matt R. Whiles
{"title":"Global patterns of allochthony in stream–riparian meta-ecosystems","authors":"Daniel C. Allen,&nbsp;James Larson,&nbsp;Christina A. Murphy,&nbsp;Erica A. Garcia,&nbsp;Kurt E. Anderson,&nbsp;Michelle H. Busch,&nbsp;Alba Argerich,&nbsp;Alice M. Belskis,&nbsp;Kierstyn T. Higgins,&nbsp;Brooke E. Penaluna,&nbsp;Veronica Saenz,&nbsp;Jay Jones,&nbsp;Matt R. Whiles","doi":"10.1111/ele.14401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecosystems that are coupled by reciprocal flows of energy and nutrient subsidies can be viewed as a single “meta-ecosystem.” Despite these connections, the reciprocal flow of subsidies is greatly asymmetrical and seasonally pulsed. Here, we synthesize existing literature on stream–riparian meta-ecosystems to quantify global patterns of the amount of subsidy consumption by organisms, known as “allochthony.” These resource flows are important since they can comprise a large portion of consumer diets, but can be disrupted by human modification of streams and riparian zones. Despite asymmetrical subsidy flows, we found stream and riparian consumer allochthony to be equivalent. Although both fish and stream invertebrates rely on seasonally pulsed allochthonous resources, we find allochthony varies seasonally only for fish, being nearly three times greater during the summer and fall than during the winter and spring. We also find that consumer allochthony varies with feeding traits for aquatic invertebrates, fish, and terrestrial arthropods, but not for terrestrial vertebrates. Finally, we find that allochthony varies by climate for aquatic invertebrates, being nearly twice as great in arid climates than in tropical climates, but not for fish. These findings are critical to understanding the consequences of global change, as ecosystem connections are being increasingly disrupted.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14401","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystems that are coupled by reciprocal flows of energy and nutrient subsidies can be viewed as a single “meta-ecosystem.” Despite these connections, the reciprocal flow of subsidies is greatly asymmetrical and seasonally pulsed. Here, we synthesize existing literature on stream–riparian meta-ecosystems to quantify global patterns of the amount of subsidy consumption by organisms, known as “allochthony.” These resource flows are important since they can comprise a large portion of consumer diets, but can be disrupted by human modification of streams and riparian zones. Despite asymmetrical subsidy flows, we found stream and riparian consumer allochthony to be equivalent. Although both fish and stream invertebrates rely on seasonally pulsed allochthonous resources, we find allochthony varies seasonally only for fish, being nearly three times greater during the summer and fall than during the winter and spring. We also find that consumer allochthony varies with feeding traits for aquatic invertebrates, fish, and terrestrial arthropods, but not for terrestrial vertebrates. Finally, we find that allochthony varies by climate for aquatic invertebrates, being nearly twice as great in arid climates than in tropical climates, but not for fish. These findings are critical to understanding the consequences of global change, as ecosystem connections are being increasingly disrupted.

Abstract Image

溪流-河岸元生态系统的全球异重模式。
通过能量和养分补贴的相互流动而耦合的生态系统可被视为一个单一的 "元生态系统"。尽管存在这些联系,但补贴的相互流动在很大程度上是不对称的,而且是季节性的。在这里,我们综合了现有关于溪流-河岸元生态系统的文献,量化了生物消耗补贴量的全球模式,即 "allochthony"。这些资源流非常重要,因为它们可能占消费者饮食的很大一部分,但人类对溪流和河岸地带的改造可能会破坏这些资源流。尽管补贴流并不对称,但我们发现溪流和河岸的消费者异重性是等同的。虽然鱼类和溪流无脊椎动物都依赖于季节性脉冲异源资源,但我们发现只有鱼类的异源生长率随季节而变化,夏秋季节是冬春季节的近三倍。我们还发现,对于水生无脊椎动物、鱼类和陆生节肢动物来说,消费者的异食性随摄食特征的变化而变化,但对于陆生脊椎动物来说却不是这样。最后,我们发现水生无脊椎动物的异食性随气候的变化而变化,干旱气候下的异食性几乎是热带气候下的两倍,但鱼类的异食性则不尽相同。这些发现对于理解全球变化的后果至关重要,因为生态系统的联系正日益遭到破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信