Application of a multiplex molecular pneumonia panel and real-world impact on antimicrobial stewardship among patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Chieh-Lung Chen , How-Yang Tseng , Wei-Cheng Chen , Shinn-Jye Liang , Chih-Yen Tu , Yu-Chao Lin , Po-Ren Hsueh
{"title":"Application of a multiplex molecular pneumonia panel and real-world impact on antimicrobial stewardship among patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units","authors":"Chieh-Lung Chen ,&nbsp;How-Yang Tseng ,&nbsp;Wei-Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Shinn-Jye Liang ,&nbsp;Chih-Yen Tu ,&nbsp;Yu-Chao Lin ,&nbsp;Po-Ren Hsueh","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The optimal timing for applying the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FAPP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains undefined, and there are limited data on its impact on antimicrobial stewardship.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study was conducted at a referral hospital in Taiwan from November 2019 to October 2022. Adult ICU patients with HAP/VAP who underwent FAPP testing were enrolled. Patient data, FAPP results, conventional microbiological testing results, and the real-world impact of FAPP results on antimicrobial therapy adjustments were assessed. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for bacterial detection by FAPP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 592 respiratory specimens, including 564 (95.3%) endotracheal aspirate specimens, 19 (3.2%) expectorated sputum specimens and 9 (1.5%) bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, from 467 patients with HAP/VAP, FAPP testing yielded 368 (62.2%) positive results. Independent predictors for positive bacterial detection by FAPP included prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 3.14), recent admissions (OR, 1.59), elevated C-reactive protein levels (OR, 1.85), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (OR, 1.58), and septic shock (OR, 1.79). Approximately 50% of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and 58.4% for Gram-positive bacteria were adjusted or confirmed after obtaining FAPP results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified several factors predicting bacterial detection by FAPP in critically ill patients with HAP/VAP. More than 50% real-world clinical practices were adjusted or confirmed based on the FAPP results. Clinical algorithms for the use of FAPP and antimicrobial stewardship guidelines may further enhance its benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 480-489"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224000379/pdfft?md5=597e444adcd3ddb5a6d9c454423cb8cd&pid=1-s2.0-S1684118224000379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224000379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The optimal timing for applying the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FAPP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains undefined, and there are limited data on its impact on antimicrobial stewardship.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a referral hospital in Taiwan from November 2019 to October 2022. Adult ICU patients with HAP/VAP who underwent FAPP testing were enrolled. Patient data, FAPP results, conventional microbiological testing results, and the real-world impact of FAPP results on antimicrobial therapy adjustments were assessed. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for bacterial detection by FAPP.

Results

Among 592 respiratory specimens, including 564 (95.3%) endotracheal aspirate specimens, 19 (3.2%) expectorated sputum specimens and 9 (1.5%) bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, from 467 patients with HAP/VAP, FAPP testing yielded 368 (62.2%) positive results. Independent predictors for positive bacterial detection by FAPP included prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 3.14), recent admissions (OR, 1.59), elevated C-reactive protein levels (OR, 1.85), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (OR, 1.58), and septic shock (OR, 1.79). Approximately 50% of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and 58.4% for Gram-positive bacteria were adjusted or confirmed after obtaining FAPP results.

Conclusions

This study identified several factors predicting bacterial detection by FAPP in critically ill patients with HAP/VAP. More than 50% real-world clinical practices were adjusted or confirmed based on the FAPP results. Clinical algorithms for the use of FAPP and antimicrobial stewardship guidelines may further enhance its benefits.

在重症监护病房的医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关肺炎患者中应用多重肺炎分子检测面板及其对抗菌药物管理的实际影响
在重症监护病房(ICU)的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)或呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)患者中应用 BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel(FAPP)的最佳时机仍未确定,有关其对抗菌药物管理的影响的数据也很有限。这项回顾性研究于 2019 年 11 月至 2022 年 10 月在台湾一家转诊医院进行。研究纳入了接受 FAPP 检测的 HAP/VAP 成人 ICU 患者。研究评估了患者数据、FAPP结果、常规微生物检测结果以及FAPP结果对抗菌药物治疗调整的实际影响。采用逻辑回归法确定 FAPP 检测细菌的预测因素。在 467 名 HAP/VAP 患者的 592 份呼吸道标本中,包括 564 份(95.3%)气管内吸痰标本、19 份(3.2%)排痰标本和 9 份(1.5%)支气管肺泡灌洗标本,FAPP 检测得出了 368 份(62.2%)阳性结果。FAPP 检测细菌阳性的独立预测因素包括住院时间延长(比值比 [OR],3.14)、近期入院(OR,1.59)、C 反应蛋白水平升高(OR,1.85)、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分(OR,1.58)和脓毒性休克(OR,1.79)。在获得 FAPP 结果后,对革兰氏阴性菌引起的感染进行抗菌治疗的比例约为 50%,对革兰氏阳性菌进行抗菌治疗的比例为 58.4%。这项研究确定了在 HAP/VAP 重症患者中通过 FAPP 检测细菌的几个预测因素。根据 FAPP 结果,50% 以上的实际临床实践得到了调整或确认。使用 FAPP 的临床算法和抗菌药物管理指南可进一步提高其效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信