Making sense of ‘genetic programs’: biomolecular Post–Newell production systems

IF 1.7 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Mihnea Capraru
{"title":"Making sense of ‘genetic programs’: biomolecular Post–Newell production systems","authors":"Mihnea Capraru","doi":"10.1007/s10539-024-09943-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The biomedical literature makes extensive use of the concept of a genetic program. So far, however, the nature of genetic programs has received no satisfactory elucidation from the standpoint of computer science. This unsettling omission has led to doubts about the very existence of genetic programs, on the grounds that gene regulatory networks lack a predetermined schedule of execution, which may seem to contradict the very idea of a program. I show, however, that we can make perfect sense of genetic programs, if only we abandon the preconception that all computers have a von Neumann architecture. Instead, genetic programs instantiate the computational architecture of Post–Newell Production Systems. That is, genetic programs are <i>unordered</i> sets of conditional instructions, instructions that fire independently when their conditions are matched. For illustration I present a paradigm Production System that regulates the functioning of the well-known <i>lac</i> operon of <i>E. coli</i>. On close reflection it turns out that not only genes, but also proteins encode instructions. I propose, therefore, to rename genetic programs to <i>biomolecular</i> programs. Biomolecular and/or genetic programs, and the cellular computers than run them, are to be understood not as von Neumann computers, but as Post–Newell production systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55368,"journal":{"name":"Biology & Philosophy","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology & Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-024-09943-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biomedical literature makes extensive use of the concept of a genetic program. So far, however, the nature of genetic programs has received no satisfactory elucidation from the standpoint of computer science. This unsettling omission has led to doubts about the very existence of genetic programs, on the grounds that gene regulatory networks lack a predetermined schedule of execution, which may seem to contradict the very idea of a program. I show, however, that we can make perfect sense of genetic programs, if only we abandon the preconception that all computers have a von Neumann architecture. Instead, genetic programs instantiate the computational architecture of Post–Newell Production Systems. That is, genetic programs are unordered sets of conditional instructions, instructions that fire independently when their conditions are matched. For illustration I present a paradigm Production System that regulates the functioning of the well-known lac operon of E. coli. On close reflection it turns out that not only genes, but also proteins encode instructions. I propose, therefore, to rename genetic programs to biomolecular programs. Biomolecular and/or genetic programs, and the cellular computers than run them, are to be understood not as von Neumann computers, but as Post–Newell production systems.

理解 "基因程序":生物分子后纽厄尔生产系统
生物医学文献中广泛使用了基因程序的概念。然而,迄今为止,从计算机科学的角度来看,基因程序的本质尚未得到令人满意的阐释。这一令人不安的疏忽导致人们对基因程序的存在产生怀疑,理由是基因调控网络缺乏预定的执行时间表,这似乎与程序的概念相矛盾。然而,我的研究表明,只要我们放弃所有计算机都具有冯-诺依曼架构的先入之见,我们就能完美地理解基因程序。相反,基因程序实例化了后纽厄尔生产系统的计算架构。也就是说,基因程序是无序的条件指令集,当条件匹配时,指令会独立触发。为了说明这一点,我提出了一个规范大肠杆菌著名的 lac 操作子功能的生产系统范例。仔细思考后发现,不仅是基因,蛋白质也编码指令。因此,我建议将基因程序更名为生物分子程序。生物分子和/或基因程序,以及运行这些程序的细胞计算机,不应被理解为冯-诺依曼计算机,而应被理解为后纽厄尔生产系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology & Philosophy
Biology & Philosophy 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recent decades have witnessed fascinating and controversial advances in the biological sciences. This journal answers the need for meta-theoretical analysis, both about the very nature of biology, as well as about its social implications. Biology and Philosophy is aimed at a broad readership, drawn from both the sciences and the humanities. The journal subscribes to no specific school of biology, nor of philosophy, and publishes work from authors of all persuasions and all disciplines. The editorial board reflects this attitude in its composition and its world-wide membership. Each issue of Biology and Philosophy carries one or more discussions or comparative reviews, permitting the in-depth study of important works and topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信