Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of partition walls: Innovative prefabricated systems vs conventional construction

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Inês Meireles , Mario Martín-Gamboa , Vitor Sousa , Ahmad Kalthoum , Javier Dufour
{"title":"Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of partition walls: Innovative prefabricated systems vs conventional construction","authors":"Inês Meireles ,&nbsp;Mario Martín-Gamboa ,&nbsp;Vitor Sousa ,&nbsp;Ahmad Kalthoum ,&nbsp;Javier Dufour","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prefabrication is increasingly recognized as an alternative to conventional on-site construction, offering potential environmental benefits. However, these benefits are context-specific, requiring precise studies for optimal solutions. This paper presents the life-cycle environmental performance of an innovative prefabricated interior partition wall and benchmarks it against a conventional system, providing a replicable model for other novel partition walls. Detailed data collected directly from direct sources were utilized to conduct a cradle-to-gate with options Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), presenting a conveniently described method that can be widely replicated in the construction sector. The adapted LCA method presented in this study contributes to sustainable construction, providing a straightforward and robust approach to assessing the environmental impacts of innovative partition walls compared to conventional walls. For the specific scenario studied, the life-cycle impact assessment results generally indicate a superior environmental performance of the innovative prefabricated interior partition wall compared to the conventional system, resulting in impact reductions ranging from 10 to 60% across evaluated categories. For both systems, the production of materials plays a predominant role in the impact contributions. Furthermore, exploring alternative scenarios yielded significant environmental benefits, particularly in cases considering higher incorporation of recycled materials. Therefore, the direct comparison of the environmental performance of innovative partition walls against traditional solutions emerges as an environmentally sustainable path in the short and medium term. This aligns with the ongoing progress towards decarbonizing the building sector, not only in choosing more environmentally friendly solutions but also in improving the environmental performance of products through assertive changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000175/pdfft?md5=b290f9436321db6c83b2198525c70571&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000175-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prefabrication is increasingly recognized as an alternative to conventional on-site construction, offering potential environmental benefits. However, these benefits are context-specific, requiring precise studies for optimal solutions. This paper presents the life-cycle environmental performance of an innovative prefabricated interior partition wall and benchmarks it against a conventional system, providing a replicable model for other novel partition walls. Detailed data collected directly from direct sources were utilized to conduct a cradle-to-gate with options Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), presenting a conveniently described method that can be widely replicated in the construction sector. The adapted LCA method presented in this study contributes to sustainable construction, providing a straightforward and robust approach to assessing the environmental impacts of innovative partition walls compared to conventional walls. For the specific scenario studied, the life-cycle impact assessment results generally indicate a superior environmental performance of the innovative prefabricated interior partition wall compared to the conventional system, resulting in impact reductions ranging from 10 to 60% across evaluated categories. For both systems, the production of materials plays a predominant role in the impact contributions. Furthermore, exploring alternative scenarios yielded significant environmental benefits, particularly in cases considering higher incorporation of recycled materials. Therefore, the direct comparison of the environmental performance of innovative partition walls against traditional solutions emerges as an environmentally sustainable path in the short and medium term. This aligns with the ongoing progress towards decarbonizing the building sector, not only in choosing more environmentally friendly solutions but also in improving the environmental performance of products through assertive changes.

隔墙的环境生命周期比较评估:创新预制系统与传统建筑的比较
越来越多的人认识到,预制建筑可以替代传统的现场建筑,并带来潜在的环境效益。然而,这些优势是因地制宜的,需要精确的研究才能找到最佳解决方案。本文介绍了一种创新型预制室内隔墙的生命周期环境性能,并将其与传统系统进行了对比,为其他新型隔墙提供了一个可复制的模型。本文利用从直接来源收集到的详细数据,进行了 "从摇篮到大门 "的生命周期评估(LCA),提出了一种方便描述的方法,可在建筑领域广泛推广。本研究中介绍的经调整的生命周期评估方法为可持续建筑做出了贡献,它提供了一种直接而稳健的方法,用于评估创新隔墙与传统隔墙相比对环境的影响。就所研究的具体情况而言,生命周期影响评估结果普遍表明,与传统系统相比,创新型预制室内隔断墙的环境性能更优越,在各个评估类别中减少的影响从 10% 到 60% 不等。对这两种系统而言,材料的生产在影响贡献中起着主导作用。此外,对其他方案的探索也产生了显著的环境效益,特别是在考虑更多使用回收材料的情况下。因此,将创新隔墙的环保性能与传统解决方案进行直接比较,不失为中短期内环境可持续发展的途径。这与当前建筑行业在去碳化方面取得的进展是一致的,不仅要选择更环保的解决方案,还要通过果断的变革来提高产品的环保性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信