It’s You and Me: Infants’ cross-modal communicative signals and mother-infant interactive behavior predict infant regulatory patterns in the still-face paradigm at 3 months

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Marina Fuertes , Rita Almeida , Inês Martelo , Miguel Barbosa , Marjorie Beeghly
{"title":"It’s You and Me: Infants’ cross-modal communicative signals and mother-infant interactive behavior predict infant regulatory patterns in the still-face paradigm at 3 months","authors":"Marina Fuertes ,&nbsp;Rita Almeida ,&nbsp;Inês Martelo ,&nbsp;Miguel Barbosa ,&nbsp;Marjorie Beeghly","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infant regulatory behavior develops since birth and impacts their early social interactions. Infants differ in the relative coherence and incoherence of their cross-modal communicative signals during <em>en-face</em> infant-caregiver interactions. We expand this research by evaluating whether different infant regulatory patterns observed during the Face-to-Face Still-Face (FFSF) at 3 months are associated with the coherence or incoherence of infants’ cross-modal communicative behaviors during <em>en-face</em> interactions or with multiple dimensions of mother-infant interactive behavior during free-play. Analyses were based on data collected from 100 mother-infant dyads from urban, working- and middle-class backgrounds in Portugal who were videotaped during the FFSF and free play at 3 months. Results confirm that infants’ different regulatory behavior patterns in the FFSF at 3 months are associated with the coherence and incoherence of their cross-modal interactive behaviors and specific aspects of mother-infant interaction. Infants with a Social-Positive oriented regulatory pattern during the FFSF displayed more coherent and less incoherent communicative behaviors with their mothers and were more cooperative during free play. In turn, their mothers were more sensitive. Our findings support the perspective that infants' regulatory behavior strategies in the context of caregiver regulatory support and sensitivity are likely to increase dyadic correspondence and infant ability to engage with the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000092/pdfft?md5=dab57d7eeb0ea00bd23abce3d4b398d3&pid=1-s2.0-S0163638324000092-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infant regulatory behavior develops since birth and impacts their early social interactions. Infants differ in the relative coherence and incoherence of their cross-modal communicative signals during en-face infant-caregiver interactions. We expand this research by evaluating whether different infant regulatory patterns observed during the Face-to-Face Still-Face (FFSF) at 3 months are associated with the coherence or incoherence of infants’ cross-modal communicative behaviors during en-face interactions or with multiple dimensions of mother-infant interactive behavior during free-play. Analyses were based on data collected from 100 mother-infant dyads from urban, working- and middle-class backgrounds in Portugal who were videotaped during the FFSF and free play at 3 months. Results confirm that infants’ different regulatory behavior patterns in the FFSF at 3 months are associated with the coherence and incoherence of their cross-modal interactive behaviors and specific aspects of mother-infant interaction. Infants with a Social-Positive oriented regulatory pattern during the FFSF displayed more coherent and less incoherent communicative behaviors with their mothers and were more cooperative during free play. In turn, their mothers were more sensitive. Our findings support the perspective that infants' regulatory behavior strategies in the context of caregiver regulatory support and sensitivity are likely to increase dyadic correspondence and infant ability to engage with the world.

这就是你和我:婴儿的跨模态交流信号和母婴互动行为可预测 3 个月大婴儿在静止面孔范式中的调节模式。
婴儿的调节行为从出生时就开始形成,并对其早期的社会互动产生影响。在婴儿与照料者面对面互动时,婴儿跨模态交流信号的相对一致性和不一致性各不相同。我们通过评估在 3 个月大时进行的面对面静止互动(FFSF)中观察到的不同婴儿调节模式是否与婴儿在面对面互动时的跨模态交流行为的一致性或不一致性有关,或与自由游戏时的母婴互动行为的多个维度有关,从而扩展这项研究。分析基于 100 个来自葡萄牙城市、工薪阶层和中产阶级背景的母婴二人组的数据,这些数据是在 FFSF 和 3 个月时的自由游戏过程中拍摄的。结果证实,3 个月大的婴儿在 FFSF 中的不同调节行为模式与其跨模态互动行为的一致性和不一致性以及母婴互动的特定方面有关。在 FFSF 中,社交积极型调节模式的婴儿与母亲的交流行为更连贯,不连贯的行为较少,在自由游戏中也更合作。反过来,他们的母亲也更加敏感。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即婴儿在照顾者的支持和敏感性的调控下采取的调控行为策略很可能会提高二人关系的对应性和婴儿与世界接触的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信