Comparison of the effects of selected aminoglycoside antibiotics on motor behaviors in mice.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 ZOOLOGY
Veterinary Research Forum Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.30466/vrf.2023.2001972.3891
Seyed Ali Ayati Najafabadi, Ali Rassouli, Goudarz Sadeghi-Hashjin
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of selected aminoglycoside antibiotics on motor behaviors in mice.","authors":"Seyed Ali Ayati Najafabadi, Ali Rassouli, Goudarz Sadeghi-Hashjin","doi":"10.30466/vrf.2023.2001972.3891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aminoglycoside antibiotics (AGs) can cause neuromuscular blockade and paralysis of skeletal muscles. To compare the paralytic effects of selected AGs on some motor behaviors in mice, 24 male mice were divided into four groups. Each group was given one of AGs (gentamicin, dihydro-streptomycin, apramycin and amikacin) at incremental doses that increased half-logarithmically compared to the therapeutic dose (16.00 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>). Motor behavioral tests included open field test, inclined plane, horizontal bars, static rods, parallel bars and rotarod. Finally, the data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Gentamicin and dihydrostreptomycin at 32.00 times of the therapeutic dose produced complete paralysis of the limbs, respiratory arrest, and even death in some animals. However, apramycin and amikacin did not show significant effects on skeletal muscle and motor behaviors at 32.00 times of the therapeutic dose. After administration of apramycin at 100 times of the therapeutic dose, four out of six mice (66.67%) died from respiratory depression. Amikacin at this dose did not cause animal death, although it caused some changes in motor behaviors with a significant difference in comparison with control values. Gentamicin demonstrated significantly more potent effects on motor behaviors compared to the other AGs. Overall, the order of potency was gentamicin > dihydrostreptomycin > apramycin > amikacin. High doses of AGs could impair the skeletal muscle function and disrupt motor behaviors in mice. Furthermore, the paralytic potency of selected AGs on skeletal muscle was significantly different.</p>","PeriodicalId":23989,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research Forum","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2023.2001972.3891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aminoglycoside antibiotics (AGs) can cause neuromuscular blockade and paralysis of skeletal muscles. To compare the paralytic effects of selected AGs on some motor behaviors in mice, 24 male mice were divided into four groups. Each group was given one of AGs (gentamicin, dihydro-streptomycin, apramycin and amikacin) at incremental doses that increased half-logarithmically compared to the therapeutic dose (16.00 mg kg-1). Motor behavioral tests included open field test, inclined plane, horizontal bars, static rods, parallel bars and rotarod. Finally, the data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Gentamicin and dihydrostreptomycin at 32.00 times of the therapeutic dose produced complete paralysis of the limbs, respiratory arrest, and even death in some animals. However, apramycin and amikacin did not show significant effects on skeletal muscle and motor behaviors at 32.00 times of the therapeutic dose. After administration of apramycin at 100 times of the therapeutic dose, four out of six mice (66.67%) died from respiratory depression. Amikacin at this dose did not cause animal death, although it caused some changes in motor behaviors with a significant difference in comparison with control values. Gentamicin demonstrated significantly more potent effects on motor behaviors compared to the other AGs. Overall, the order of potency was gentamicin > dihydrostreptomycin > apramycin > amikacin. High doses of AGs could impair the skeletal muscle function and disrupt motor behaviors in mice. Furthermore, the paralytic potency of selected AGs on skeletal muscle was significantly different.

比较某些氨基糖苷类抗生素对小鼠运动行为的影响
氨基糖苷类抗生素(AGs)可导致神经肌肉阻滞和骨骼肌瘫痪。为了比较某些 AGs 对小鼠某些运动行为的麻痹作用,24 只雄性小鼠被分为四组。每组给予一种 AGs(庆大霉素、双氢链霉素、阿普霉素和阿米卡星),剂量以治疗剂量(16.00 毫克/千克)为基准,按半对数递增。运动行为测试包括开阔地测试、斜面测试、水平杆测试、静态杆测试、平行杆测试和旋转木马测试。最后,使用描述性和分析性统计对数据进行了分析。治疗剂量为 32.00 倍的庆大霉素和双氢链霉素会导致一些动物四肢完全瘫痪、呼吸停止,甚至死亡。然而,阿普霉素和阿米卡星的剂量为治疗剂量的 32.00 倍时,对骨骼肌和运动行为没有明显影响。服用治疗剂量 100 倍的阿普霉素后,6 只小鼠中有 4 只(66.67%)死于呼吸抑制。该剂量的阿米卡星不会导致动物死亡,但会导致一些运动行为的改变,与对照组相比差异显著。与其他 AGs 相比,庆大霉素对运动行为的影响明显更强。总体而言,药效顺序为庆大霉素 > 双氢链霉素 > 阿普霉素 > 阿米卡星。高剂量的AGs会损害小鼠的骨骼肌功能并破坏其运动行为。此外,某些 AGs 对骨骼肌的麻痹效力存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Research Forum
Veterinary Research Forum Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Research Forum (VRF) is a quarterly international journal committed to publish worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including anatomy and histology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomic and clinical pathology, parasitology, microbiology, immunology and epidemiology, food hygiene, poultry science, fish and aquaculture, anesthesia and surgery, large and small animal internal medicine, large and small animal reproduction, biotechnology and diagnostic imaging of domestic, companion and farm animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信