The Role of Preoperative CT Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Colorectal Cancer Angiogenesis and its Clinical Value.

Abstract

Purpose: Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, plays a crucial role in tumor growth and metastasis. Understanding the vascular characteristics of colorectal cancer through preoperative computed tomography (CT) perfusion parameters can provide valuable insights into the tumor's aggressiveness and potential for spread. Additionally, exploring the correlation between these parameters and serum tumor marker levels may offer a comprehensive perspective on the disease's biological behavior.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we investigated 42 colorectal cancer patients. Based on microvascular density (MVD) measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), participants were categorized into either a high-density group (n = 24) with MVD ≥ 35/field of view or a low-density group (n = 18) with MVD < 35/field of view. Additionally, a control group comprised 25 patients with pathologically confirmed benign colorectal lesions. This study design allowed us to assess the correlation between MVD and colorectal cancer, differentiating between high and low microvascular density groups, while also comparing results to a control group for comprehensive analysis.

Results: Colorectal cancer was associated with significantly higher levels of blood volume (BV; high-density group: 7.65±1.36 mL/100g; low-density group: 6.73±1.29 mL/100g), blood flow (BF; high-density group: 67.33±12.16 ml/(100g·min); low-density group: 52.84±11.43 ml/(100g·min)), permeability surface (PS; high-density group: 35.19±6.32 ml/(100g·min); low-density group: 22.27±4.85 ml/(100g·min)), serum glycoprotein antigen 19-9 (CA19-9; high-density group: 45.38±5.41 g/ml); low-density group: 23.43±3.59 g/ml), glycoprotein antigen 125 (CA125; high-density group: 27.56±3.73 g/ml); low-density group: 12.63±2.59 g/ml), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; high-density group: 17.87±3.12 g/ml); low-density group: 8.51±2.87 g/ml) versus benign colorectal lesions, with more significant changes observed in the high-density group versus the low-density group (P ≤ .001). The three groups showed similar mean transit time (MTT). The AUCs under the ROC curves for BV, BF, PS, and TTP were 0.901, 0.898, 0.963, and 0.983, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation of patients' serum CA19-9 with BV, BF, and PS., Serum CA125 and CEA were positively correlated with BF and PS, and the above indicators were negatively correlated with TTP.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of preoperative CT perfusion imaging as a valuable tool for evaluating angiogenesis in colorectal cancer and its correlation with serum tumor markers. The identified associations open avenues for further research to delve into specific aspects of angiogenesis and tumor markers. Future investigations could focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed correlations, potentially identifying novel therapeutic targets. Additionally, exploring the dynamic changes in angiogenesis and tumor markers during different stages of colorectal cancer progression may provide a more comprehensive understanding. Moreover, assessing the prognostic value of these imaging and biomarker correlations in larger, diverse patient cohorts could enhance their clinical utility. Our findings lay the groundwork for these future research directions, emphasizing the need for continued exploration to advance our knowledge and improve clinical strategies for colorectal cancer management.