Interacting learning between the philosophy of science and the history of science

Dora Alexandra Villota Enríquez, Jakeline Amparo Villota Enríquez, Maribel Deicy Villota Enríquez
{"title":"Interacting learning between the philosophy of science and the history of science","authors":"Dora Alexandra Villota Enríquez, Jakeline Amparo Villota Enríquez, Maribel Deicy Villota Enríquez","doi":"10.36260/rbr.v13i3.2098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This document aims to critically address the reflection of the paraphrase that Lakatos makes about Kant “the philosophy of science without the history of science is empty; the history of science without the philosophy of science is blind. The documentary analysis of the literature related to the subject of this document is based on a literature review raised from scientific materials such as: books, theses, free texts on Internet sites and articles. The results show us that from the approach of the history of science and the philosophy of science we recover fundamental and methodical elements within the learning process.","PeriodicalId":325465,"journal":{"name":"Revista Boletín Redipe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Boletín Redipe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v13i3.2098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This document aims to critically address the reflection of the paraphrase that Lakatos makes about Kant “the philosophy of science without the history of science is empty; the history of science without the philosophy of science is blind. The documentary analysis of the literature related to the subject of this document is based on a literature review raised from scientific materials such as: books, theses, free texts on Internet sites and articles. The results show us that from the approach of the history of science and the philosophy of science we recover fundamental and methodical elements within the learning process.
科学哲学与科学史之间的互动学习
本文件旨在批判性地反思拉卡托斯关于康德的比喻:"没有科学史的科学哲学是空洞的;没有科学哲学的科学史是盲目的。对与本文件主题相关的文献进行文献分析的基础是文献综述,这些文献来自科学资料,如书籍、论文、互联网网站上的免费文本和文章。分析结果表明,从科学史和科学哲学的角度,我们发现了学习过程中的基本要素和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信