Impacts of heat stress on the accuracy of a noseband sensor for detection of eating and rumination behavior in confined cattle

{"title":"Impacts of heat stress on the accuracy of a noseband sensor for detection of eating and rumination behavior in confined cattle","authors":"","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Precision monitoring of feeding behaviors can aid in dairy herd management. Noseband sensors (RumiWatch System [RW]; Itin + Hoch GmbH) have been established as an automated gold standard for evaluating precision technologies in grazing cows, but more advanced algorithms have not been validated in confinement settings. Additionally, little is known regarding effects of environmental conditions on sensor performance. Therefore, accuracy of RW in quantifying eating and rumination time in confinement was evaluated using 2 versions of the analysis software algorithms (RW Converter V.7.3.2 and V.7.3.36) under thermoneutral (TN; 21.0°C, 64.0% relative humidity [RH], temperature-humidity index [THI] = 67) and heat stress conditions (HS; cyclical daily temperatures to mimic diurnal patterns; 0700–1900 h: 33.6°C, 40.0% RH, THI = 83.5; 1900–0700 h: 23.2°C, 70.0% RH; THI = 70.3). Nine individually housed Holstein × Simmental cross steers were fitted with RW noseband sensors. Agreement for eating time reported by RW and visual observations (1-min scan sampling) was very high in TN regardless of software version (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]: V.7.3.2 = 0.91; V.7.3.36 = 0.94), and remained high to very high (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.89; V.7.3.36 = 0.95) during HS. Agreement for rumination time was very high regardless of software version in both TN (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.93; V.7.3.36 = 0.99) and HS (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.91; V.7.3.36 = 0.99). Overall, RW accurately quantified eating and ruminating time in confined cattle, and noseband sensors retained accuracy during heat stress. These results indicate RW may serve as a benchmark for future precision technology validations in dairy cattle managed in confinement systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000413/pdfft?md5=bd817260e00a61e2a77e9d6ed06dea90&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000413-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision monitoring of feeding behaviors can aid in dairy herd management. Noseband sensors (RumiWatch System [RW]; Itin + Hoch GmbH) have been established as an automated gold standard for evaluating precision technologies in grazing cows, but more advanced algorithms have not been validated in confinement settings. Additionally, little is known regarding effects of environmental conditions on sensor performance. Therefore, accuracy of RW in quantifying eating and rumination time in confinement was evaluated using 2 versions of the analysis software algorithms (RW Converter V.7.3.2 and V.7.3.36) under thermoneutral (TN; 21.0°C, 64.0% relative humidity [RH], temperature-humidity index [THI] = 67) and heat stress conditions (HS; cyclical daily temperatures to mimic diurnal patterns; 0700–1900 h: 33.6°C, 40.0% RH, THI = 83.5; 1900–0700 h: 23.2°C, 70.0% RH; THI = 70.3). Nine individually housed Holstein × Simmental cross steers were fitted with RW noseband sensors. Agreement for eating time reported by RW and visual observations (1-min scan sampling) was very high in TN regardless of software version (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]: V.7.3.2 = 0.91; V.7.3.36 = 0.94), and remained high to very high (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.89; V.7.3.36 = 0.95) during HS. Agreement for rumination time was very high regardless of software version in both TN (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.93; V.7.3.36 = 0.99) and HS (CCC: V.7.3.2 = 0.91; V.7.3.36 = 0.99). Overall, RW accurately quantified eating and ruminating time in confined cattle, and noseband sensors retained accuracy during heat stress. These results indicate RW may serve as a benchmark for future precision technology validations in dairy cattle managed in confinement systems.

热应激对用于检测圈养牛进食和反刍行为的鼻带传感器准确性的影响
对采食行为的精确监控有助于奶牛群的管理。鼻带传感器(RumiWatch System [RW]; Itin + Hoch GmbH)已被确立为评估放牧奶牛精确技术的自动化黄金标准,但更先进的算法尚未在圈养环境中得到验证。此外,人们对环境条件对传感器性能的影响知之甚少。因此,我们使用两个版本的分析软件算法(RW Converter V.7.3.2 和 V.7.3.36),在中温条件(TN;21.0°C,64.0% 相对湿度[RH],温湿度指数[THI] = 67)和热应激条件(HS;模仿昼夜模式的周期性日温;0700-1900 h:33.6°C, 40.0% 相对湿度, THI = 83.5; 1900-0700 h: 23.2°C, 70.0% 相对湿度; THI = 70.3)。九头单独饲养的荷斯坦×西门塔尔杂交母牛安装了RW鼻带传感器。无论软件版本如何(一致性相关系数 [CCC]:V.7.3.2 = 0.91;V.7.3.36 = 0.94),RW 报告的进食时间与肉眼观察(1 分钟扫描取样)的一致性在 TN 中都非常高,在 HS 期间也保持高至非常高的一致性(一致性相关系数:V.7.3.2 = 0.89;V.7.3.36 = 0.95)。在 TN(CCC:V.7.3.2 = 0.93;V.7.3.36 = 0.99)和 HS(CCC:V.7.3.2 = 0.91;V.7.3.36 = 0.99)中,无论软件版本如何,反刍时间的一致性都非常高。总体而言,RW 能准确量化圈养牛的进食和反刍时间,鼻带传感器在热应激期间仍能保持准确性。这些结果表明,RW 可以作为未来圈养系统中奶牛精确技术验证的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信