Registering Race: Inclusion and Omission in Bolivian Military-Service Records 1900–1960

The Americas Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1017/tam.2024.1
Elizabeth Shesko
{"title":"Registering Race: Inclusion and Omission in Bolivian Military-Service Records 1900–1960","authors":"Elizabeth Shesko","doi":"10.1017/tam.2024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through presence or absence, indigeneity has long been at the center of Bolivian politics, culture, and nationalism.1 It carries immense social import. Yet what Indigenous means and who gets counted as part of this umbrella category has never been clear or static. Although Bolivia's racial and ethnic categories seem as etched in stone as the Andes themselves, individual classification is fluid and situational based on sociocultural markers that change over time. These markers include occupation, literacy, dress, language, surname, and residence. Individuals may move through these categories (and not only in one direction) over the course of their lives. This fluidity, combined with changing meaning and the valorization of indigeneity at the national and international levels, has led to wild fluctuations in official statistics on race since independence. The social construction of these categories came to the fore in 2012 when the census reported that Bolivians who identified as Indigenous had dropped to 40 percent of the population, down from 62 percent only eleven years earlier. International observers were left wondering, where did all the Indigenous people go?2","PeriodicalId":507356,"journal":{"name":"The Americas","volume":"111 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/tam.2024.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through presence or absence, indigeneity has long been at the center of Bolivian politics, culture, and nationalism.1 It carries immense social import. Yet what Indigenous means and who gets counted as part of this umbrella category has never been clear or static. Although Bolivia's racial and ethnic categories seem as etched in stone as the Andes themselves, individual classification is fluid and situational based on sociocultural markers that change over time. These markers include occupation, literacy, dress, language, surname, and residence. Individuals may move through these categories (and not only in one direction) over the course of their lives. This fluidity, combined with changing meaning and the valorization of indigeneity at the national and international levels, has led to wild fluctuations in official statistics on race since independence. The social construction of these categories came to the fore in 2012 when the census reported that Bolivians who identified as Indigenous had dropped to 40 percent of the population, down from 62 percent only eleven years earlier. International observers were left wondering, where did all the Indigenous people go?2
种族登记:1900-1960 年玻利维亚兵役记录中的纳入与遗漏
无论是否存在,土著性长期以来一直是玻利维亚政治、文化和民族主义的中心。然而,"土著 "的含义以及谁被归入这一总括范畴,从来都不明确,也不是一成不变的。尽管玻利维亚的种族和民族分类似乎就像安第斯山脉本身一样刻在石头上,但个人的分类是不固定的,是基于随时间变化的社会文化标志的情景分类。这些标志包括职业、文化程度、服饰、语言、姓氏和居住地。个人在一生中可能会在这些类别中穿梭(而不仅仅是朝一个方向)。这种流动性,再加上在国家和国际层面上不断变化的含义和对土著身份的重视,导致自独立以来官方种族统计数据的剧烈波动。2012 年,人口普查报告显示,玻利维亚土著居民占总人口的比例从 11 年前的 62% 降至 40%,这凸显了这些类别的社会建构问题。国际观察家们不禁要问:土著人都去哪儿了?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书