A Comparative Study of Homoeopathic Decimal Versus Centesimal Potency Medicine in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis

Swati Singh, Neeraj Gupta
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Homoeopathic Decimal Versus Centesimal Potency Medicine in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis","authors":"Swati Singh, Neeraj Gupta","doi":"10.48165/ahr.2024.9.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a  degenerative condition of the cervical spine found  almost universally in persons over50 years of age. It  has become one of the common problems globally.Methods: An experimental study was conducted on  60 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis as per  the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 60 cases of  cervical spondylosis were randomized into 2 groups  of 30 patients each. One group was prescribed with  Individualized Homoeopathic medicine in decimal  scale potency and the other group was prescribed  with centesimal scale potencies of Individualized  Homoeopathic medicine. The Remedy Response  Evaluation Form was used to assess and interpret  the follow up of the patients. The improvement of  the patients was assessed by the Neck Disability  Index (NDI). Result: Intra-group changes in NDI  score were found statistically significant (P < 0.001,  unpaired t test) group difference though favored  centesimal against decimal. Conclusion: On statistical analysis, the p value was  less than 0.001. Hence there is a significant difference  between post treatment score of centesimal potency  group as compared to decimal potency group.  \n ","PeriodicalId":486795,"journal":{"name":"Advancements in Homeopathic Research","volume":"115 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancements in Homeopathic Research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/ahr.2024.9.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a  degenerative condition of the cervical spine found  almost universally in persons over50 years of age. It  has become one of the common problems globally.Methods: An experimental study was conducted on  60 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis as per  the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 60 cases of  cervical spondylosis were randomized into 2 groups  of 30 patients each. One group was prescribed with  Individualized Homoeopathic medicine in decimal  scale potency and the other group was prescribed  with centesimal scale potencies of Individualized  Homoeopathic medicine. The Remedy Response  Evaluation Form was used to assess and interpret  the follow up of the patients. The improvement of  the patients was assessed by the Neck Disability  Index (NDI). Result: Intra-group changes in NDI  score were found statistically significant (P < 0.001,  unpaired t test) group difference though favored  centesimal against decimal. Conclusion: On statistical analysis, the p value was  less than 0.001. Hence there is a significant difference  between post treatment score of centesimal potency  group as compared to decimal potency group.   
治疗颈椎病的十药力与百药力同种疗法比较研究
背景:颈椎病(CS)是一种颈椎退行性病变,几乎普遍存在于 50 岁以上的人群中。它已成为全球常见问题之一:根据纳入和排除标准,对 60 名确诊为颈椎病的患者进行了实验研究。所有 60 例颈椎病患者被随机分为两组,每组 30 人。一组处方十进制药效的个体化同种疗法药物,另一组处方厘定药效的个体化同种疗法药物。治疗反应评估表用于评估和解释患者的随访情况。通过颈部残疾指数(NDI)评估患者的改善情况。结果发现 NDI 分数的组内变化具有显著的统计学意义(P < 0.001,非配对 t 检验),但组间差异偏向于百分数而非十进制。结论经统计分析,P 值小于 0.001。因此,与十进制药效组相比,十进制药效组的治疗后评分有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信