Prognostic value of B-score for predicting joint replacement in the context of osteoarthritis phenotypes: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Abstract

Objective

Developing new therapies for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) requires improved prediction of disease progression. This study evaluated the prognostic value of clinical clusters and machine-learning derived quantitative 3D bone shape B-score for predicting total and partial knee replacement (KR).

Design

This retrospective study used longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. A previous study used patients' clinical profiles to delineate phenotypic clusters. For these clusters, the distribution of B-scores was assessed (employing Tukey's method). The value of both cluster allocation and B-score for KR-prediction was then evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves for time-to-event analyses. The impact of using B-score vs. cluster was evaluated using a likelihood ratio test for the multivariable Cox model; global performances were assessed by concordance statistics (Harrell's C-index) and time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

B-score differed significantly for the individual clinical clusters (p ​< ​0.001). Overall, 9.4% of participants had a KR over 9 years, with a shorter time to event in clusters with high B-score at baseline. Those clusters were characterized clinically by a high rate of comorbidities and potential signs of inflammation. Both phenotype and B-score independently predicted KR, with better prediction if combined (P ​< ​0.001). B-score added predictive value in groups with less pain and radiographic severity but limited physical activity.

Conclusions

B-scores correlated with phenotypes based on clinical patient profiles. B-score and phenotype independently predicted KR surgery, with higher predictive value if combined. This can be used for patient stratification in drug development and potentially risk prediction in clinical practice.