N. Sengul , I. Gültürk , M. Yilmaz , E. Celik , N. Paksoy , E. Yekedüz , Y. Ürün , M. Basaran , M. Özgüroğlu
{"title":"Seguridad y eficacia del nivolumab para el tratamiento de pacientes con carcinoma de células renales metastásico e insuficiencia renal","authors":"N. Sengul , I. Gültürk , M. Yilmaz , E. Celik , N. Paksoy , E. Yekedüz , Y. Ürün , M. Basaran , M. Özgüroğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->40<!--> <!-->mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.</p></div><div><h3>Material and metods</h3><p>Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->40<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and the second category(<span>C</span>2). included those with eGFR≥ 40<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2.</sup></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.415).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480624000202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.
Material and metods
Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the second category(C2). included those with eGFR≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Results
Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (p = 0.486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (p = 0.415).
Conclusion
Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.
期刊介绍:
Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology.
Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.