Evaluation of peer recovery services for substance use disorder in Minnesota: Impact of peer recovery initiation on SUD treatment and recovery

Cody R. Tuttle, Aaron T. Berger, Sean L. Barton, Ben Nguyen, Weston Merrick
{"title":"Evaluation of peer recovery services for substance use disorder in Minnesota: Impact of peer recovery initiation on SUD treatment and recovery","authors":"Cody R. Tuttle,&nbsp;Aaron T. Berger,&nbsp;Sean L. Barton,&nbsp;Ben Nguyen,&nbsp;Weston Merrick","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Substance use disorder (SUD) remains one of the most persistent public health challenges across the nation and in Minnesota. One intervention to help people with SUD is peer recovery services (PRS). PRS is a form on non-clinical support where trained individuals who are more established in recovery come alongside people currently in the recovery journey and provide guidance in the treatment process, help in accessing resources, and offer an empathetic ear. In combination with other services in the continuum of care, PRS seeks to reduce harm from disordered use. In 2018, Minnesota made PRS for SUD a Medicaid reimbursable service. While prior literature demonstrates promising effects of PRS for SUD, especially in treatment retention and participant experience, most studies evaluated PRS in limited settings, rather than in a large-scale implementation. Our retrospective, matched-cohort study used administrative data to estimate the impact of initiating Medicaid-reimbursable PRS for SUD on treatment, overdose, and mortality. Our results align, in some dimensions, with prior literature evaluating smaller-scale programs with positive impacts on treatment completion. We also find, however, that PRS at scale did not produce other positive outcomes that past studies have documented, particularly around overdose and inpatient treatment. This suggests that PRS follows a common challenge of implementing promising ideas at scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000088/pdfft?md5=45c71cbf5abed5695a70f557a8fe48d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000088-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substance use disorder (SUD) remains one of the most persistent public health challenges across the nation and in Minnesota. One intervention to help people with SUD is peer recovery services (PRS). PRS is a form on non-clinical support where trained individuals who are more established in recovery come alongside people currently in the recovery journey and provide guidance in the treatment process, help in accessing resources, and offer an empathetic ear. In combination with other services in the continuum of care, PRS seeks to reduce harm from disordered use. In 2018, Minnesota made PRS for SUD a Medicaid reimbursable service. While prior literature demonstrates promising effects of PRS for SUD, especially in treatment retention and participant experience, most studies evaluated PRS in limited settings, rather than in a large-scale implementation. Our retrospective, matched-cohort study used administrative data to estimate the impact of initiating Medicaid-reimbursable PRS for SUD on treatment, overdose, and mortality. Our results align, in some dimensions, with prior literature evaluating smaller-scale programs with positive impacts on treatment completion. We also find, however, that PRS at scale did not produce other positive outcomes that past studies have documented, particularly around overdose and inpatient treatment. This suggests that PRS follows a common challenge of implementing promising ideas at scale.

明尼苏达州药物使用障碍同伴康复服务评估:同伴康复启动对吸毒成瘾治疗和康复的影响
在全美和明尼苏达州,药物使用障碍 (SUD) 仍是最持久的公共卫生挑战之一。帮助吸毒成瘾者的一种干预措施是同伴康复服务 (PRS)。同伴康复服务是一种非临床支持形式,在这种形式下,经过培训的、在康复方面较为成熟的个人会与目前正处于康复过程中的人并肩作战,在治疗过程中提供指导,帮助获取资源,并倾听他们的心声。PRS 与持续护理中的其他服务相结合,旨在减少无序使用造成的伤害。2018 年,明尼苏达州将针对 SUD 的 PRS 定为医疗补助可报销服务。虽然之前的文献表明 PRS 对 SUD 有着良好的效果,尤其是在治疗保留率和参与者体验方面,但大多数研究都是在有限的环境中评估 PRS,而不是大规模实施。我们的回顾性、配对队列研究使用行政数据来估算针对 SUD 启动医疗补助可偿还的 PRS 对治疗、用药过量和死亡率的影响。我们的研究结果在某些方面与之前的文献相一致,这些文献评估了对完成治疗有积极影响的较小规模项目。但我们也发现,大规模的 PRS 并未产生以往研究中记录的其他积极结果,尤其是在用药过量和住院治疗方面。这表明,PRS 在大规模实施有前景的想法时面临着共同的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信