Active injection method for fluidic winglet

Amir Zare Shahneha
{"title":"Active injection method for fluidic winglet","authors":"Amir Zare Shahneha","doi":"10.15406/aaoaj.2024.08.00191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various solutions for the fluidic winglet are proposed to investigate the impact of parameters such as velocity, temperature and injection direction, and slot area for air ejection. This study is based on the replacement to A380 solid winglet. The results reveal that maximising these parameters doesn’t always minimise drag; rather, a balance needs to be found to achieve optimal efficiency. The study demonstrates a potential maximum reduction of 3.81%, often linked with a decrease in lift. The optimal design is a single rectangular slot injecting at 260 m/s, exhibiting lower lift reduction than drag reduction and high efficiency. Thus, currently, there isn’t a significant advantage justifying a paradigm shift for these devices.","PeriodicalId":474325,"journal":{"name":"Aeronautics and aerospace open access journal","volume":"16 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeronautics and aerospace open access journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/aaoaj.2024.08.00191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various solutions for the fluidic winglet are proposed to investigate the impact of parameters such as velocity, temperature and injection direction, and slot area for air ejection. This study is based on the replacement to A380 solid winglet. The results reveal that maximising these parameters doesn’t always minimise drag; rather, a balance needs to be found to achieve optimal efficiency. The study demonstrates a potential maximum reduction of 3.81%, often linked with a decrease in lift. The optimal design is a single rectangular slot injecting at 260 m/s, exhibiting lower lift reduction than drag reduction and high efficiency. Thus, currently, there isn’t a significant advantage justifying a paradigm shift for these devices.
流体翼片的主动注入方法
针对流体小翼提出了各种解决方案,以研究速度、温度和喷射方向以及空气喷射槽面积等参数的影响。这项研究以替代 A380 实心小翼为基础。研究结果表明,将这些参数最大化并不总能使阻力最小化;相反,需要找到一个平衡点来实现最佳效率。研究表明,潜在的最大减阻率为 3.81%,通常与升力下降有关。最佳设计是以 260 米/秒的速度喷射单个矩形槽,升力减幅小于阻力减幅,效率高。因此,目前还没有明显的优势证明这些设备的模式转变是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信