Challenges, Alternatives, and Paths to Sustainability for Health Information Exchange Efforts Using PROMETHEE Method

3 Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.46632/aae/1/3/3
{"title":"Challenges, Alternatives, and Paths to Sustainability for Health Information Exchange Efforts Using PROMETHEE Method","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/aae/1/3/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic health information sharing and regional health information centres The practise of emergency medicine in the United States can have a significant impact. Regional Health Information Institutes are stakeholder networks that share local or regional information in a specific geographic area. Set up electronic data transfer. Safety of medical care and to improve efficiency across the country regional health information institutions are being created; Public health initiatives, biological surveillance and enhancing the reaction of catastrophe management; and identifying for research enormous databases of aggregate data. However, the economy Organizational issues and including geography to facilitate exchange With the Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO) model They identified challenges. Direct, institutional HIE and such as seller-mediated exchange versus alternative modes of exchange RHIOs vary. Due to political and economic reasons HIE is a difficult task. It is of many types Classified by optional activities; they are for alternatives in judgments The differences between Used to allocate. Under conventional criterion priority functions Using PROMETHEE Choice of health information exchange. This paper proposes that in the final option to check the effect of different optional functions Comparable results are presented. Seven economic and environmental criteria, Four health information and Five decision makers health information exchange problem Major Structures. with decision makers using a five-point Likert scale by personal communication Data was collected. Under the usual criterion function PROMETHEE's algorithm is implemented. The pharmaceutical industry and research, medical trials, healthcare fraud detection, neurological research, and electronic health records are alternatives. Evaluation Parameters are Transparent, Autonomy, Open Source, Anonymity and Decentralized. Health Information Exchange using PROMETHEE. Electronic Health Records, is got third rank, Clinical Research is got first rank, Medical Fraud Detection is got forth rank, Neuroscience Research is got fifth rank and Pharmaceutical Industry and Research is got second rank","PeriodicalId":513014,"journal":{"name":"3","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/aae/1/3/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health information sharing and regional health information centres The practise of emergency medicine in the United States can have a significant impact. Regional Health Information Institutes are stakeholder networks that share local or regional information in a specific geographic area. Set up electronic data transfer. Safety of medical care and to improve efficiency across the country regional health information institutions are being created; Public health initiatives, biological surveillance and enhancing the reaction of catastrophe management; and identifying for research enormous databases of aggregate data. However, the economy Organizational issues and including geography to facilitate exchange With the Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO) model They identified challenges. Direct, institutional HIE and such as seller-mediated exchange versus alternative modes of exchange RHIOs vary. Due to political and economic reasons HIE is a difficult task. It is of many types Classified by optional activities; they are for alternatives in judgments The differences between Used to allocate. Under conventional criterion priority functions Using PROMETHEE Choice of health information exchange. This paper proposes that in the final option to check the effect of different optional functions Comparable results are presented. Seven economic and environmental criteria, Four health information and Five decision makers health information exchange problem Major Structures. with decision makers using a five-point Likert scale by personal communication Data was collected. Under the usual criterion function PROMETHEE's algorithm is implemented. The pharmaceutical industry and research, medical trials, healthcare fraud detection, neurological research, and electronic health records are alternatives. Evaluation Parameters are Transparent, Autonomy, Open Source, Anonymity and Decentralized. Health Information Exchange using PROMETHEE. Electronic Health Records, is got third rank, Clinical Research is got first rank, Medical Fraud Detection is got forth rank, Neuroscience Research is got fifth rank and Pharmaceutical Industry and Research is got second rank
使用 PROMETHEE 方法实现医疗信息交换工作的挑战、替代方案和可持续发展之路
电子健康信息共享和地区健康信息中心 在美国,急诊医学的实践可以产生重大影响。地区卫生信息机构是利益相关者网络,在特定地理区域共享当地或地区信息。建立电子数据传输。在全国范围内建立地区卫生信息机构,确保医疗安全,提高效率;开展公共卫生活动,进行生物监测,提高灾难管理的反应能力;建立庞大的综合数据研究数据库。然而,经济 组织问题和包括地理位置在内的问题促进了交换。直接的、机构性的 HIE 和诸如以卖方为中介的交换与 RHIOs 的其他交换模式相比各不相同。由于政治和经济原因,HIE 是一项艰巨的任务。它有多种类型,按可选择的活动分类;它们是用于判断的替代方法。在传统的标准优先功能下,使用 PROMETHEE 选择卫生信息交换。本文建议在最终选项中检查不同可选功能的效果。七项经济和环境标准、四项卫生信息和五项决策者卫生信息交流问题的主要结构。通过与决策者的个人交流,使用五点李克特量表收集了数据。在通常的标准功能下,采用 PROMETHEE 算法。制药业和研究、医学试验、医疗欺诈检测、神经学研究和电子健康记录是备选方案。评估参数包括透明性、自主性、开源性、匿名性和分散性。使用 PROMETHEE 进行健康信息交换。电子健康记录排名第三,临床研究排名第一,医疗欺诈检测排名第四,神经科学研究排名第五,制药工业和研究排名第二。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
3
3
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信