Challenging the Status Quo: Open Journal Systems for Online Academic Writing Course

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Roni Herdianto, P. Setyosari, D. Kuswandi, A. Wibawa
{"title":"Challenging the Status Quo: Open Journal Systems for Online Academic Writing Course","authors":"Roni Herdianto, P. Setyosari, D. Kuswandi, A. Wibawa","doi":"10.34190/ejel.22.1.3360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Doctoral students require scientific writing skills and appropriate learning media assistance to meet publication requirements in distinguished journals. This investigation evaluates the efficacy of Moodle and OJS in teaching dissertation proposals, based on the experiences of engineering doctoral students, to provide suggestions for the optimal platform. The study examining the efficacy of the OJS-based learning model for developing dissertation proposals as compared to Moodle for engineering doctoral students revealed varying results based on the statistical methodology used by UEQ. While the Comparison of Scale Means indicated OJS to be superior across all scales, the Two-Sample T-Test established significant differences solely on a few scales. While the OJS learning model may have a higher mean value, its superiority across all aspects of UEQ cannot be assumed. To enhance student learning experience, outcomes, and the learning model itself, optimization of all UEQ scales is imperative in the OJS-based approach to dissertation proposal development","PeriodicalId":46105,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of e-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.1.3360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doctoral students require scientific writing skills and appropriate learning media assistance to meet publication requirements in distinguished journals. This investigation evaluates the efficacy of Moodle and OJS in teaching dissertation proposals, based on the experiences of engineering doctoral students, to provide suggestions for the optimal platform. The study examining the efficacy of the OJS-based learning model for developing dissertation proposals as compared to Moodle for engineering doctoral students revealed varying results based on the statistical methodology used by UEQ. While the Comparison of Scale Means indicated OJS to be superior across all scales, the Two-Sample T-Test established significant differences solely on a few scales. While the OJS learning model may have a higher mean value, its superiority across all aspects of UEQ cannot be assumed. To enhance student learning experience, outcomes, and the learning model itself, optimization of all UEQ scales is imperative in the OJS-based approach to dissertation proposal development
挑战现状:在线学术写作课程的开放式期刊系统
博士生需要科学写作技巧和适当的学习媒体帮助,以满足在著名期刊上发表论文的要求。本调查根据工程学博士生的经验,评估了 Moodle 和 OJS 在论文提案教学中的功效,为最佳平台提供建议。根据 UEQ 所使用的统计方法,对基于 OJS 的学习模式与 Moodle 相比在工程学博士生论文提案撰写方面的功效进行的研究显示了不同的结果。虽然量表均值比较表明 OJS 在所有量表上都更胜一筹,但双样本 T 检验仅在少数量表上确定了显著差异。虽然开放式英语学习模式的平均值可能更高,但不能假定它在 UEQ 的所有方面都更胜一筹。为了提高学生的学习体验、成果和学习模式本身,在基于开放式英语学习系统的论文提案开发中,优化所有统考量表势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Electronic Journal of e-Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信