Chemometric modeling of the lowest observed effect level (LOEL) and no observed effect level (NOEL) for rat toxicity†

IF 3.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ankur Kumar, Probir Kumar Ojha and Kunal Roy
{"title":"Chemometric modeling of the lowest observed effect level (LOEL) and no observed effect level (NOEL) for rat toxicity†","authors":"Ankur Kumar, Probir Kumar Ojha and Kunal Roy","doi":"10.1039/D3VA00265A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Humans and other living species of the ecosystem are constantly exposed to a wide range of chemicals of natural as well as synthetic origin. A multitude of compounds exert profound long-term detrimental health effects. The chronic toxicity profile of chemicals is of utmost importance for long-term risk assessment. Experimental testing of the chronic toxicity of compounds is not always a feasible option considering the magnitude of the number of chemicals, resource intensiveness in terms of time, limited availability of experimental data, and associated cost, which therefore necessitates the use of <em>in silico</em> approaches to overcome the associated limitations. In this work, QSAR (quantitative structure–activity relationship) models were developed employing the regression-based PLS method with strict adherence to OECD guidelines. For this study, chronic and sub-chronic toxicity datasets with LOEL (lowest observed effect levels) and NOEL (no observed effect level) as endpoints were used for model development. The validated models are robust, reliable, and predictable. The statistical results of the models are as follows: <em>R</em><small><sup>2</sup></small>: 0.6–0.71, <em>Q</em><small><sub>LOO</sub></small><small><sup>2</sup></small>: 0.51–0.635, and <em>Q</em><small><sub>F1</sub></small><small><sup>2</sup></small>: 0.52–0.658. From the validated models, it was concluded that lipophilicity, electronegativity, the presence of aromatic ethers or aliphatic oxime groups, the presence of complexity in structures, the state of unsaturation in molecules, and the presence of halogen and heavy atoms (phosphate, sulphur, <em>etc.</em>) are responsible for chronic/sub-chronic toxicity. The QSAR models developed in our study can be utilized for the effective gap-filling of toxicity data sets, categorization, and prioritization of chemicals, along with chronic toxicity prediction of new synthetic compounds. Furthermore, we used 2568 approved drugs from the DrugBank and PPDB databases for screening purposes using the validated models, which further corroborated the developed models based on the available toxicity data.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/va/d3va00265a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/va/d3va00265a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans and other living species of the ecosystem are constantly exposed to a wide range of chemicals of natural as well as synthetic origin. A multitude of compounds exert profound long-term detrimental health effects. The chronic toxicity profile of chemicals is of utmost importance for long-term risk assessment. Experimental testing of the chronic toxicity of compounds is not always a feasible option considering the magnitude of the number of chemicals, resource intensiveness in terms of time, limited availability of experimental data, and associated cost, which therefore necessitates the use of in silico approaches to overcome the associated limitations. In this work, QSAR (quantitative structure–activity relationship) models were developed employing the regression-based PLS method with strict adherence to OECD guidelines. For this study, chronic and sub-chronic toxicity datasets with LOEL (lowest observed effect levels) and NOEL (no observed effect level) as endpoints were used for model development. The validated models are robust, reliable, and predictable. The statistical results of the models are as follows: R2: 0.6–0.71, QLOO2: 0.51–0.635, and QF12: 0.52–0.658. From the validated models, it was concluded that lipophilicity, electronegativity, the presence of aromatic ethers or aliphatic oxime groups, the presence of complexity in structures, the state of unsaturation in molecules, and the presence of halogen and heavy atoms (phosphate, sulphur, etc.) are responsible for chronic/sub-chronic toxicity. The QSAR models developed in our study can be utilized for the effective gap-filling of toxicity data sets, categorization, and prioritization of chemicals, along with chronic toxicity prediction of new synthetic compounds. Furthermore, we used 2568 approved drugs from the DrugBank and PPDB databases for screening purposes using the validated models, which further corroborated the developed models based on the available toxicity data.

Abstract Image

大鼠毒性的最低观测效应水平 (LOEL) 和无观测效应水平 (NOEL) 的化学计量模型
人类和生态系统中的其他生物物种经常接触到各种天然和合成的化学物质。许多化合物都会对健康产生深远的长期不利影响。化学品的慢性毒性对长期风险评估至关重要。对化合物的慢性毒性进行实验测试,除了需要大量的时间、有限的实验数据和相关成本外,考虑到化学品数量的庞大,并不总是一个可行的选择,这就需要利用硅学方法来克服相关的限制。在此,我们采用基于回归的 PLS 方法建立了 QSAR(定量结构-活性关系)模型,并严格遵守了 OECD 准则。在本研究中,以 LOEL(最低观测效应水平)和 NOEL(无观测效应水平)为终点的慢性和亚慢性毒性数据集被用于模型开发。经过验证的模型是稳健、可靠和可预测的。模型的统计结果如下:R^2:0.6-0.71;Q_LOO^2:0.51-0.635;Q_F1^2:0.52-0.658。从验证的模型中得出的结论是,亲脂性、电负性、芳香醚或脂肪肟基团的存在、结构的复杂性、分子中的不饱和状态以及卤素和重原子(磷酸盐、硫等)的存在是造成慢性/亚慢性毒性的原因。我们在研究中开发的 QSAR 模型可用于有效填补毒性数据集的空白、对化学品进行分类和优先排序,以及预测新合成化合物的慢性毒性。我们还进一步利用药物库和 PPDB 数据库中的 2568 种已获批准的药物,使用已验证的模型进行筛选,这可能是基于现有毒性数据对所开发模型的额外验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信