Assessing harmonized intelligence measures in a multinational study

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mariah DeSerisy, Melanie M. Wall, Terry E. Goldberg, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Katherine Keyes, Niels T. de Joode, Christine Lochner, Clara Marincowitz, Madhuri Narayan, Nitin Anand, Amy M. Rapp, Dan J. Stein, H. Blair Simpson, Amy E. Margolis
{"title":"Assessing harmonized intelligence measures in a multinational study","authors":"Mariah DeSerisy, Melanie M. Wall, Terry E. Goldberg, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Katherine Keyes, Niels T. de Joode, Christine Lochner, Clara Marincowitz, Madhuri Narayan, Nitin Anand, Amy M. Rapp, Dan J. Stein, H. Blair Simpson, Amy E. Margolis","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies examining the neurocognitive and circuit-based etiology of psychiatric illness are moving toward inclusive, global designs. A potential confounding effect of these associations is general intelligence; however, an internationally validated, harmonized intelligence quotient (IQ) measure is not available. We describe the procedures used to measure IQ across a five-site, multinational study and demonstrate the harmonized measure’s cross-site validity. Culturally appropriate intelligence measures were selected: four short-form Wechsler intelligence tests (Brazil, Netherlands, South Africa, United States) and the Binet Kamat (India). Analyses included IQ scores from 255 healthy participants (age 18–50; 42% male). Regression analyses tested between-site differences in IQ scores, as well as expected associations with sociodemographic factors (sex, socioeconomic status, education) to assess validity. Harmonization (e.g., a priori selection of tests) yielded the compatibility of IQ measures. Higher IQ was associated with higher socioeconomic status, suggesting good convergent validity. No association was found between sex and IQ at any site, suggesting good discriminant validity. Associations between higher IQ and higher years of education were found at all sites except the United States. Harmonized IQ scores provide a measure of IQ with evidence of good validity that can be used in neurocognitive and circuit-based studies to control for intelligence across global sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.22","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies examining the neurocognitive and circuit-based etiology of psychiatric illness are moving toward inclusive, global designs. A potential confounding effect of these associations is general intelligence; however, an internationally validated, harmonized intelligence quotient (IQ) measure is not available. We describe the procedures used to measure IQ across a five-site, multinational study and demonstrate the harmonized measure’s cross-site validity. Culturally appropriate intelligence measures were selected: four short-form Wechsler intelligence tests (Brazil, Netherlands, South Africa, United States) and the Binet Kamat (India). Analyses included IQ scores from 255 healthy participants (age 18–50; 42% male). Regression analyses tested between-site differences in IQ scores, as well as expected associations with sociodemographic factors (sex, socioeconomic status, education) to assess validity. Harmonization (e.g., a priori selection of tests) yielded the compatibility of IQ measures. Higher IQ was associated with higher socioeconomic status, suggesting good convergent validity. No association was found between sex and IQ at any site, suggesting good discriminant validity. Associations between higher IQ and higher years of education were found at all sites except the United States. Harmonized IQ scores provide a measure of IQ with evidence of good validity that can be used in neurocognitive and circuit-based studies to control for intelligence across global sites.

在一项多国研究中评估统一情报措施
对精神疾病的神经认知和回路病因进行的研究正朝着包容性、全球性设计的方向发展。这些关联的一个潜在混杂效应是一般智力;然而,目前还没有一个经过国际验证的、统一的智商(IQ)测量方法。我们介绍了在五地多国研究中测量智商的程序,并证明了统一测量方法的跨地有效性。我们选择了适合不同文化背景的智力测验方法:四种韦氏短式智力测验(巴西、荷兰、南非、美国)和 Binet Kamat(印度)。分析包括 255 名健康参与者(18-50 岁;42% 为男性)的智商分数。回归分析测试了不同地点之间智商分数的差异,以及与社会人口因素(性别、社会经济地位、教育程度)的预期关联,以评估有效性。通过协调(如事先选择测试项目)得出了智商测量的兼容性。较高的智商与较高的社会经济地位相关联,表明具有良好的趋同效度。在任何地点都没有发现性别与智商之间的关联,这表明区分效度良好。除美国外,所有研究地点均发现智商越高与受教育年限越长有关。统一的智商分数提供了一种具有良好有效性的智商测量方法,可用于基于神经认知和电路的研究,以控制全球各地的智力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信