Relationship between muscle mass ratio and rocuronium dose required for maintaining deep neuromuscular blockade: A prospective observational study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jiwon Han , Ah-Young Oh , Jung-Won Hwang , Sun Woo Nam
{"title":"Relationship between muscle mass ratio and rocuronium dose required for maintaining deep neuromuscular blockade: A prospective observational study","authors":"Jiwon Han ,&nbsp;Ah-Young Oh ,&nbsp;Jung-Won Hwang ,&nbsp;Sun Woo Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) has benefits in various surgical procedures, however, precise quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is crucial for its proper maintenance and recovery. Neuromuscular blocking agent dosage relies on actual body weight (ABW), but this varies among individuals. Therefore, this study hypothesizes that there is a correlation between the rocuronium requirement for deep NMB and muscle mass ratio measured by bioelectric impedance analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety adult female patients undergoing laparoscopic operation were enrolled in this study. Muscle and fat masses were assessed using a body composition analyser. Deep NMB, defined as a post-tetanic count of 1–2, was maintained through the continuous infusion of rocuronium. The primary outcome involves determining the correlation between the rocuronium dose required for deep NMB and the muscle mass ratio. Conversely, secondary outcomes included assessing the relationship between the rocuronium dose for deep NMB and fat mass ratio, and ABW. Additionally, we investigated their relationship with rocuronium onset time and profound blockade duration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No relationship was observed between the muscle mass ratio and rocuronium dose required for maintaining deep NMB (r = 0.059 [95% CI = 0.153–0.267], <em>p</em> = 0.586). Fat mass ratio and ABW showed no correlation with the rocuronium dose, whereas rocuronium onset time was positively correlated with muscle mass ratio (r = 0.327) and negatively correlated with fat mass ratio (r = −0.302), respectively. Profound blockade duration showed no correlation with any of the assessed variables.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No correlation was detected between muscle mass ratio and the rocuronium dose required to achieve deep NMB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) has benefits in various surgical procedures, however, precise quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is crucial for its proper maintenance and recovery. Neuromuscular blocking agent dosage relies on actual body weight (ABW), but this varies among individuals. Therefore, this study hypothesizes that there is a correlation between the rocuronium requirement for deep NMB and muscle mass ratio measured by bioelectric impedance analysis.

Methods

Ninety adult female patients undergoing laparoscopic operation were enrolled in this study. Muscle and fat masses were assessed using a body composition analyser. Deep NMB, defined as a post-tetanic count of 1–2, was maintained through the continuous infusion of rocuronium. The primary outcome involves determining the correlation between the rocuronium dose required for deep NMB and the muscle mass ratio. Conversely, secondary outcomes included assessing the relationship between the rocuronium dose for deep NMB and fat mass ratio, and ABW. Additionally, we investigated their relationship with rocuronium onset time and profound blockade duration.

Results

No relationship was observed between the muscle mass ratio and rocuronium dose required for maintaining deep NMB (r = 0.059 [95% CI = 0.153–0.267], p = 0.586). Fat mass ratio and ABW showed no correlation with the rocuronium dose, whereas rocuronium onset time was positively correlated with muscle mass ratio (r = 0.327) and negatively correlated with fat mass ratio (r = −0.302), respectively. Profound blockade duration showed no correlation with any of the assessed variables.

Conclusions

No correlation was detected between muscle mass ratio and the rocuronium dose required to achieve deep NMB.

肌肉质量比与维持深度神经肌肉阻滞所需的罗库溴铵剂量之间的关系: 一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:深度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)在各种外科手术中都有益处,然而,精确的定量神经肌肉监测对其正常维持和恢复至关重要。神经肌肉阻滞剂的用量取决于实际体重(ABW),但这因人而异。因此,本研究假设深部 NMB 所需的罗库溴铵与生物电阻抗分析测得的肌肉质量比之间存在相关性:方法:本研究选取了 90 名接受腹腔镜手术的成年女性患者。使用人体成分分析仪评估肌肉和脂肪质量。通过持续输注罗库溴铵维持深度阻滞,深度阻滞的定义是泰坦后计数为 1-2。主要结果包括确定深度阻滞所需的罗库溴铵剂量与肌肉质量比之间的相关性。相反,次要结果包括评估罗库溴铵剂量、脂肪质量比和 ABW 之间的关系。此外,我们还研究了它们与罗库溴铵起效时间和深度阻滞持续时间之间的关系:结果:肌肉质量比与维持深度阻滞所需的罗库溴铵剂量之间没有关系(r = 0.059 [95% CI = 0.153 - 0.267],p = 0.586)。脂肪质量比和 ABW 与罗库溴铵剂量无相关性,而罗库溴铵起效时间分别与肌肉质量比(r=0.327)和脂肪质量比(r=-0.302)呈正相关和负相关。深度阻滞持续时间与任何评估变量均无相关性:结论:肌肉质量比与实现深度阻滞所需的罗库溴铵剂量之间没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信