Alterations of Lacrimal Sac Microbiota in Failed Dacryocystorhinostomy: The Lacriome Paper 6.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2024.2327481
Mohammad Javed Ali
{"title":"Alterations of Lacrimal Sac Microbiota in Failed Dacryocystorhinostomy: The Lacriome Paper 6.","authors":"Mohammad Javed Ali","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2327481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the metagenomics of the microbes isolated from the lacrimal sac in patients with failed dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was performed on 10 consecutive patients with failed DCR. Lacrimal sac samples were obtained for metagenomic analysis during the revision endoscopic DCR. The samples were collected intraoperatively after a full-length lacrimal sac marsupialization and immediately transported on ice to the laboratory. A whole shotgun metagenome sequencing was performed on the Illumina<sup>TM</sup> platform following DNA extraction and library preparation. The downstream analysis of the samples was performed using various software packaged in the Squeeze Metapipeline v1.3.0 and marker gene-based metagenomic phylogenetic analysis using MetaPhlAn4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five major phyla identified across the samples of failed DCR include Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria (Figure 1). The prevalent species include Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas juntendi, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter ursingii, Citrobacter koseri, and Cutibacterium acnes (Figure 2). Among the other organisms identified, few were from genera candida and mezorhizobium. Among the viruses, the most abundant was the BeAn 58058 virus. It was interesting to note the occasional presence of plasmodium and toxoplasma species. The functional category distribution of KEGG (Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes) data showed microbial metabolism to be the most involved function, followed by cellular processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first whole metagenome sequencing of the lacrimal sac contents from failed DCR patients. The organisms identified varied significantly from those isolated from patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) using similar techniques and reflect altered lacrimal microbiota in surgically unsuccessful DCRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2327481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To study the metagenomics of the microbes isolated from the lacrimal sac in patients with failed dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Methods: A prospective study was performed on 10 consecutive patients with failed DCR. Lacrimal sac samples were obtained for metagenomic analysis during the revision endoscopic DCR. The samples were collected intraoperatively after a full-length lacrimal sac marsupialization and immediately transported on ice to the laboratory. A whole shotgun metagenome sequencing was performed on the IlluminaTM platform following DNA extraction and library preparation. The downstream analysis of the samples was performed using various software packaged in the Squeeze Metapipeline v1.3.0 and marker gene-based metagenomic phylogenetic analysis using MetaPhlAn4.

Results: The five major phyla identified across the samples of failed DCR include Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria (Figure 1). The prevalent species include Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas juntendi, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter ursingii, Citrobacter koseri, and Cutibacterium acnes (Figure 2). Among the other organisms identified, few were from genera candida and mezorhizobium. Among the viruses, the most abundant was the BeAn 58058 virus. It was interesting to note the occasional presence of plasmodium and toxoplasma species. The functional category distribution of KEGG (Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes) data showed microbial metabolism to be the most involved function, followed by cellular processes.

Conclusion: This is the first whole metagenome sequencing of the lacrimal sac contents from failed DCR patients. The organisms identified varied significantly from those isolated from patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) using similar techniques and reflect altered lacrimal microbiota in surgically unsuccessful DCRs.

泪囊鼻腔造口术失败者泪囊微生物群的变化:Lacriome 论文 6。
目的:研究从泪囊鼻腔造口术(DCR)失败患者的泪囊中分离出的微生物的元基因组学:方法:对连续 10 例 DCR 失败的患者进行前瞻性研究。方法:该研究对连续 10 例 DCR 失败的患者进行了前瞻性研究,在翻修内窥镜 DCR 时采集泪囊样本进行元基因组分析。样本在术中进行全长泪囊贮藏术后采集,并立即冰冻运送至实验室。DNA 提取和文库制备完成后,在 IlluminaTM 平台上进行了全枪元基因组测序。使用Squeeze Metapipeline v1.3.0软件包中的各种软件对样本进行下游分析,并使用MetaPhlAn4.Results进行基于标记基因的元基因组系统发育分析:在不合格的 DCR 样品中发现的五大门类包括变形菌、固形菌、放线菌、类杆菌和镰刀菌(图 1)。常见的菌种包括嗜麦芽僵化单胞菌、君顶假单胞菌、肺炎链球菌、乌苏里节杆菌、柯氏柠檬酸杆菌和痤疮杆菌(图 2)。在鉴定出的其他生物中,只有少数来自念珠菌属和梅氏菌属。在病毒中,数量最多的是 BeAn 58058 病毒。值得注意的是,疟原虫和弓形虫偶尔也会出现。KEGG(京都基因和基因组百科全书)数据的功能类别分布显示,微生物代谢是涉及最多的功能,其次是细胞过程:这是首次对DCR失败患者的泪囊内容物进行全元基因组测序。结论:这是首次对手术失败的DCR患者的泪囊内容物进行全元基因组测序。所发现的微生物与使用类似技术从原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞(PANDO)患者体内分离出的微生物有很大不同,反映了手术失败的DCR患者的泪道微生物群发生了改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信