Academic procrastination, incentivized and self-selected spaced practice, and quiz performance in an online programming problem system: An intensive longitudinal investigation

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yingbin Zhang , Luc Paquette , Xiaoyong Hu
{"title":"Academic procrastination, incentivized and self-selected spaced practice, and quiz performance in an online programming problem system: An intensive longitudinal investigation","authors":"Yingbin Zhang ,&nbsp;Luc Paquette ,&nbsp;Xiaoyong Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Time management is crucial for college students' academic success and learning of computer programming. Yet the changes of time management behaviors and their associations with learning outcomes are underexplored in online learning of programming. To address the gap, this study employed an intensive longitudinal approach to examine undergraduates’ time management behaviors in an online programming problem system. Specifically, we analyzed weekly indicators of academic procrastination and spaced practice derived from programming traces. We applied dynamic structural equation modeling to examine the changes in these behaviors over time and their correlations with weekly quiz performance. Academic procrastination and self-selected spaced practice showed a significant upward trend over time, while incentivized spaced practice exhibited a significant downward trend. Moreover, students with prior programming experience showed a greater growth rate in spacing behaviors. At both within- and between-person levels, procrastination predicted quiz performance significantly and negatively, while self-selected spaced practice predicted quiz performance significantly and positively. In contrast, incentivized spaced practice predicted quiz performance positively at the within-person level but negatively at the between-person level. Additionally, quiz performance in the current week predicted subsequent time management behaviors significantly. These findings contribute to the understanding of procrastination and spaced practice in online programming learning and have implications for the design of scaffolding on time management. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the significance of combining intensive longitudinal approaches and action logs in examining the temporality of learning in online environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 105029"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524000435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time management is crucial for college students' academic success and learning of computer programming. Yet the changes of time management behaviors and their associations with learning outcomes are underexplored in online learning of programming. To address the gap, this study employed an intensive longitudinal approach to examine undergraduates’ time management behaviors in an online programming problem system. Specifically, we analyzed weekly indicators of academic procrastination and spaced practice derived from programming traces. We applied dynamic structural equation modeling to examine the changes in these behaviors over time and their correlations with weekly quiz performance. Academic procrastination and self-selected spaced practice showed a significant upward trend over time, while incentivized spaced practice exhibited a significant downward trend. Moreover, students with prior programming experience showed a greater growth rate in spacing behaviors. At both within- and between-person levels, procrastination predicted quiz performance significantly and negatively, while self-selected spaced practice predicted quiz performance significantly and positively. In contrast, incentivized spaced practice predicted quiz performance positively at the within-person level but negatively at the between-person level. Additionally, quiz performance in the current week predicted subsequent time management behaviors significantly. These findings contribute to the understanding of procrastination and spaced practice in online programming learning and have implications for the design of scaffolding on time management. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the significance of combining intensive longitudinal approaches and action logs in examining the temporality of learning in online environments.

在线编程问题系统中的学业拖延、激励性和自我选择的间隔练习以及测验成绩:深入纵向调查
时间管理对大学生的学业成功和计算机编程学习至关重要。然而,在编程的在线学习中,时间管理行为的变化及其与学习效果的关联却未得到充分探讨。为了弥补这一空白,本研究采用了一种密集纵向方法来考察本科生在在线编程问题系统中的时间管理行为。具体来说,我们分析了每周的学业拖延指标和从编程痕迹中得出的间隔练习指标。我们采用动态结构方程模型来研究这些行为随时间的变化及其与每周测验成绩的相关性。随着时间的推移,学业拖延和自主选择的间隔练习呈现出显著的上升趋势,而激励性间隔练习则呈现出显著的下降趋势。此外,有编程经验的学生的间隔练习行为增长率更高。在人内和人际层面上,拖延症对测验成绩的预测具有显著的负向影响,而自我选择间隔练习对测验成绩的预测具有显著的正向影响。相比之下,激励性间隔练习在人内水平上对测验成绩有积极的预测作用,但在人际水平上却有消极的预测作用。此外,当周的测验成绩对随后的时间管理行为有显著的预测作用。这些发现有助于人们理解在线编程学习中的拖延和间隔练习,并对时间管理支架的设计产生了影响。此外,本研究还表明,在研究在线环境中学习的时间性时,将强化纵向方法与行动日志相结合具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信