Technology-Supported Guidance Models to Stimulate Nursing Students' Self-Efficacy in Clinical Practice: Scoping Review.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.2196/54443
Paula Bresolin, Simen A Steindal, Hanne Maria Bingen, Jaroslav Zlamal, Jussara Gue Martini, Eline Kaupang Petersen, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes
{"title":"Technology-Supported Guidance Models to Stimulate Nursing Students' Self-Efficacy in Clinical Practice: Scoping Review.","authors":"Paula Bresolin, Simen A Steindal, Hanne Maria Bingen, Jaroslav Zlamal, Jussara Gue Martini, Eline Kaupang Petersen, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes","doi":"10.2196/54443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In nursing education, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills is crucial for developing competence in clinical practice. Nursing students encounter challenges in acquiring these essential skills, making self-efficacy a critical component in their professional development. Self-efficacy pertains to individual's belief in their ability to perform tasks and overcome challenges, with significant implications for clinical skills acquisition and academic success. Previous research has underscored the strong link between nursing students' self-efficacy and their clinical competence. Technology has emerged as a promising tool to enhance self-efficacy by enabling personalized learning experiences and in-depth discussions. However, there is a need for a comprehensive literature review to assess the existing body of knowledge and identify research gaps.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to systematically map and identify gaps in published studies on the use of technology-supported guidance models to stimulate nursing students' self-efficacy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted in ERIC, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2011 and April 2023. The reference lists of the included papers were manually searched to identify additional studies. Pairs of authors screened the papers, assessed eligibility, and extracted the data. The data were thematically organized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 studies were included and four thematic groups were identified: (1) technological solutions for learning support, (2) learning focus in clinical practice, (3) teaching strategies and theoretical approaches for self-efficacy, and (4) assessment of self-efficacy and complementary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various technological solutions were adopted in the guidance models to stimulate the self-efficacy of nursing students in clinical practice, leading to positive findings. A total of 7 out of 8 studies presented results that were not statistically significant, highlighting the need for further refinement of the applied interventions. Nurse educators play a pivotal role in applying learning strategies and theoretical approaches to enhance nursing students' self-efficacy, but the contributions of nurse preceptors and peers should not be overlooked. Future studies should consider involving users in the intervention process and using validated instruments tailored to the studies' intervention objectives, ensuring relevance and enabling comparisons across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"7 ","pages":"e54443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In nursing education, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills is crucial for developing competence in clinical practice. Nursing students encounter challenges in acquiring these essential skills, making self-efficacy a critical component in their professional development. Self-efficacy pertains to individual's belief in their ability to perform tasks and overcome challenges, with significant implications for clinical skills acquisition and academic success. Previous research has underscored the strong link between nursing students' self-efficacy and their clinical competence. Technology has emerged as a promising tool to enhance self-efficacy by enabling personalized learning experiences and in-depth discussions. However, there is a need for a comprehensive literature review to assess the existing body of knowledge and identify research gaps.

Objective: The aim of this study is to systematically map and identify gaps in published studies on the use of technology-supported guidance models to stimulate nursing students' self-efficacy in clinical practice.

Methods: This scoping review followed the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted in ERIC, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2011 and April 2023. The reference lists of the included papers were manually searched to identify additional studies. Pairs of authors screened the papers, assessed eligibility, and extracted the data. The data were thematically organized.

Results: A total of 8 studies were included and four thematic groups were identified: (1) technological solutions for learning support, (2) learning focus in clinical practice, (3) teaching strategies and theoretical approaches for self-efficacy, and (4) assessment of self-efficacy and complementary outcomes.

Conclusions: Various technological solutions were adopted in the guidance models to stimulate the self-efficacy of nursing students in clinical practice, leading to positive findings. A total of 7 out of 8 studies presented results that were not statistically significant, highlighting the need for further refinement of the applied interventions. Nurse educators play a pivotal role in applying learning strategies and theoretical approaches to enhance nursing students' self-efficacy, but the contributions of nurse preceptors and peers should not be overlooked. Future studies should consider involving users in the intervention process and using validated instruments tailored to the studies' intervention objectives, ensuring relevance and enabling comparisons across studies.

激发护理专业学生临床实践自我效能的技术支持指导模式:范围审查。
背景:在护理教育中,缩小理论知识与实践技能之间的差距对于培养临床实践能力至关重要。护理专业学生在掌握这些基本技能时会遇到各种挑战,因此自我效能感成为他们专业发展的关键因素。自我效能感与个人对自己完成任务和克服挑战的能力的信念有关,对临床技能的掌握和学业成功具有重要影响。以往的研究强调了护生的自我效能感与其临床能力之间的密切联系。通过个性化的学习体验和深入的讨论,技术已成为提高自我效能感的一种有前途的工具。然而,有必要进行一次全面的文献综述,以评估现有的知识体系并找出研究缺口:本研究旨在系统地梳理已发表的关于使用技术支持的指导模式来激发护理专业学生在临床实践中的自我效能感的研究,并找出其中的不足之处:本范围界定综述遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架,并根据《范围界定综述的系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。我们在 ERIC、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 中对 2011 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月间发表的研究进行了系统、全面的文献检索。人工检索了所收录论文的参考文献目录,以确定其他研究。两位作者筛选论文、评估资格并提取数据。对数据进行了专题整理:共纳入了 8 项研究,并确定了四个专题组:(结果:共纳入 8 项研究,并确定了四个专题组:(1)学习支持的技术解决方案;(2)临床实践中的学习重点;(3)自我效能的教学策略和理论方法;(4)自我效能评估和补充结果:结论:为激发护生在临床实践中的自我效能感,在指导模式中采用了各种技术解决方案,并取得了积极的研究结果。在 8 项研究中,共有 7 项研究的结果不具有统计学意义,这表明有必要进一步完善所应用的干预措施。护士教育者在应用学习策略和理论方法提高护生自我效能感方面发挥着关键作用,但也不应忽视护士戒律者和同伴的贡献。未来的研究应考虑让使用者参与干预过程,并根据研究的干预目标使用经过验证的工具,以确保研究的相关性,并能对不同研究进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信