Corrigendum to: Attitudes, intentions and procreative responsibility in current and future assisted reproduction

IF 1.7 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/bioe.13278
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Attitudes, intentions and procreative responsibility in current and future assisted reproduction","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bioe.13278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Battisti, D. (2023). Attitudes, intentions and procreative responsibility in current and future assisted reproduction. <i>Bioethics, 37</i>(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13150.</p><p>The name ‘McDougall’ is incorrectly spelled as ‘McDougal’ on pages 453 and 454.</p><p>The phrase ‘focus-agent focus’ on page 454 is incorrect and should read ‘future-agent focus’.</p><p>The part of the sentence \"implies the prospective parents\" should be replaced with \"commits\", and the word \"have\" in the same sentence should be replaced with \"having\". This sentence should read: \"Considering this, we can recognize that the parent-child relationship argument commits procreators to having attitudes and intentions that are not in contrast with the desires and hopes that their children's lives go well and that they are safe from suffering\" paragraph 4, page 456.</p><p>The word ‘having’ should be replaced with ‘parenting’ in the final paragraph of page 455. This sentence should read: ‘On the one hand, the distinction between creating and parenting a child enables us to justify the fact that the beginning of a parent–child relationship is also morally relevant in the procreative context’.</p><p>The word ‘having’ should be replaced with ‘creating’ on the first line of page 456. This sentence should read: ‘To explain the moral relevance of the distinction between creating and parenting a child let us consider again the example of the couple that, through PGD plus IVF, deliberately select a child with a disability D’.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"38 4","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bioe.13278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.13278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battisti, D. (2023). Attitudes, intentions and procreative responsibility in current and future assisted reproduction. Bioethics, 37(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13150.

The name ‘McDougall’ is incorrectly spelled as ‘McDougal’ on pages 453 and 454.

The phrase ‘focus-agent focus’ on page 454 is incorrect and should read ‘future-agent focus’.

The part of the sentence "implies the prospective parents" should be replaced with "commits", and the word "have" in the same sentence should be replaced with "having". This sentence should read: "Considering this, we can recognize that the parent-child relationship argument commits procreators to having attitudes and intentions that are not in contrast with the desires and hopes that their children's lives go well and that they are safe from suffering" paragraph 4, page 456.

The word ‘having’ should be replaced with ‘parenting’ in the final paragraph of page 455. This sentence should read: ‘On the one hand, the distinction between creating and parenting a child enables us to justify the fact that the beginning of a parent–child relationship is also morally relevant in the procreative context’.

The word ‘having’ should be replaced with ‘creating’ on the first line of page 456. This sentence should read: ‘To explain the moral relevance of the distinction between creating and parenting a child let us consider again the example of the couple that, through PGD plus IVF, deliberately select a child with a disability D’.

更正:当前和未来辅助生殖的态度、意图和生育责任。
Battisti, D. (2023)。当前和未来辅助生殖的态度、意图和生育责任》。Bioethics, 37(5), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13150.The 第 453 和 454 页中的 "McDougall "拼写错误,应为 "McDougal"。第 454 页中的 "focus-agent focus "短语不正确,应为 "future-agent focus"。句子中的 "imply the prospective parents "应改为 "commits",同一句中的 "have "应改为 "having"。该句应改为考虑到这一点,我们可以认识到,亲子关系的论点使生育者的态度和意图与他们希望子女生活顺利、免受痛苦的愿望和希望不相矛盾。"第 456 页第 4 段最后一段中的 "拥有 "一词应改为 "养育"。该句应为:'一方面,对创造和养育子女的区分使我们能够证明,亲子关系的开始在道 义上也与生育有关。该句应改为:"为了解释创造一个孩子与养育一个孩子之间的区别在道义上的相关性,让我们再 次考虑这样一个例子:一对夫妇通过 PGD 加试管婴儿技术,特意选择了一个残疾儿童 D"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信