Multicultural Considerations for the Psychometrics of the Brief Pornography Screen.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1089/cyber.2023.0493
Nicholas C Borgogna, Bailey M Way, Shane W Kraus
{"title":"Multicultural Considerations for the Psychometrics of the Brief Pornography Screen.","authors":"Nicholas C Borgogna, Bailey M Way, Shane W Kraus","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2023.0493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problematic pornography use (PPU) is a burgeoning area of clinical interest. The Brief Pornography Screen (BPS) is a new PPU measure. The BPS has not been psychometrically studied within specific race/cultural groups. We sought to broaden the PPU literature by examining the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) fit, measurement invariance, and structural invariance of the BPS across eight identity groups. Participants came from a survey administered at three U.S. universities. In total, <i>n</i> = 2,475 participants were analyzed, with the following identity group breakdowns: Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) male = 268, AAPI female = 303, Black male = 101, Black female = 189, Latin male = 208, Latin female = 372, White male = 432, and White female = 602. BPS CFA fit was good across all groups. Measurement invariance analyses suggested metric, but not scalar invariance across all groups. We then split participants by sex assignment, full residual invariance was evident across groups for male participants and partial residual invariance was evident for female participants. Structural invariance analyses indicated anxiety as a weak positive BPS correlate in AAPI, Latin, and White male participants (β's = 0.25-0.27), but not meaningfully related in the other groups. Pornography viewing frequency was positively correlated with BPS scores across most groups with a wide range (β's = 0.29-0.52), except for Black male participants (β = 0.15). Our results suggest that the BPS is an appropriate PPU measure across the tested identity groups. While between-group measurement is relatively accurate within sex assignment groups, correlates differed in strength, meaning different variables likely predict PPU for different groups of people.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problematic pornography use (PPU) is a burgeoning area of clinical interest. The Brief Pornography Screen (BPS) is a new PPU measure. The BPS has not been psychometrically studied within specific race/cultural groups. We sought to broaden the PPU literature by examining the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) fit, measurement invariance, and structural invariance of the BPS across eight identity groups. Participants came from a survey administered at three U.S. universities. In total, n = 2,475 participants were analyzed, with the following identity group breakdowns: Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) male = 268, AAPI female = 303, Black male = 101, Black female = 189, Latin male = 208, Latin female = 372, White male = 432, and White female = 602. BPS CFA fit was good across all groups. Measurement invariance analyses suggested metric, but not scalar invariance across all groups. We then split participants by sex assignment, full residual invariance was evident across groups for male participants and partial residual invariance was evident for female participants. Structural invariance analyses indicated anxiety as a weak positive BPS correlate in AAPI, Latin, and White male participants (β's = 0.25-0.27), but not meaningfully related in the other groups. Pornography viewing frequency was positively correlated with BPS scores across most groups with a wide range (β's = 0.29-0.52), except for Black male participants (β = 0.15). Our results suggest that the BPS is an appropriate PPU measure across the tested identity groups. While between-group measurement is relatively accurate within sex assignment groups, correlates differed in strength, meaning different variables likely predict PPU for different groups of people.

色情简明筛查心理测量的多元文化考虑。
问题性色情使用(PPU)是一个新兴的临床研究领域。色情简明筛查(BPS)是一种新的 PPU 测量方法。BPS 尚未在特定种族/文化群体中进行心理测量研究。我们试图通过研究 BPS 在八个身份群体中的确证因子分析(CFA)拟合度、测量不变性和结构不变性来拓宽 PPU 文献的范围。调查对象来自美国三所大学。总共分析了 n = 2,475 名参与者,身份群体细分如下:亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民(AAPI)男性 = 268 人,亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民女性 = 303 人,黑人男性 = 101 人,黑人女性 = 189 人,拉丁裔男性 = 208 人,拉丁裔女性 = 372 人,白人男性 = 432 人,白人女性 = 602 人。所有群体的 BPS CFA 拟合效果良好。测量不变性分析表明,所有组别均具有度量不变性,但不具有标量不变性。然后,我们将参与者按性别分配,男性参与者在各组间具有明显的完全残差不变量,而女性参与者则具有明显的部分残差不变量。结构不变量分析表明,焦虑与亚裔美国人、拉丁人和白人男性参与者的 BPS 呈弱正相关(β's = 0.25-0.27),但与其他组别无显著相关。除黑人男性参与者(β = 0.15)外,大多数群体的色情观看频率与 BPS 分数呈正相关,且相关范围较广(β's = 0.29-0.52)。我们的研究结果表明,在所测试的身份认同群体中,BPS 是一种合适的 PPU 测量方法。虽然在性别分配组内,组间测量相对准确,但相关因素的强度不同,这意味着不同的变量可能会预测不同人群的 PPU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信