China's high-speed rail industrial organization structure reform under inter-modal competition

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Xiaoqi Wang , Honghai Xu
{"title":"China's high-speed rail industrial organization structure reform under inter-modal competition","authors":"Xiaoqi Wang ,&nbsp;Honghai Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China has an independent high-speed railway (HSR) system that is different from ordinary railways. Compared to conventional rail, HSR faces more competition from transport such as aviation, since its faster speed. Designing an industrial organization structure suitable for HSR is a key issue to be solved in furthering the reform of the China railway industry. By constructing a Salop model with horizontal differentiation, we analyze the economic effects of implementing different industrial organization structures for HSR under the condition of inter-modal competition. The study found that introducing train operators or establishing regional companies may lead to foreclosure effects under the vertical integration (VI) structure. Under the vertical separation (VS) structure, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies can promote competition, but it easily leads to double marginalization problem. Regardless of the structure, whether VI or VS, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies also has lock-in effects on some HSR passengers. These effects lead to higher fares, which harm consumer surplus, but it may not necessarily improve the profits of the entire HSR industry. In general, maintaining the VI or implementing the complete VS (including simple VS and introducing train operators under VS structure) can obtain better social welfare under certain conditions, depending on the cost difference of various transport modes. According to this conclusion and the situation in China, we have proposed several directional recommendations for the future reform.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China has an independent high-speed railway (HSR) system that is different from ordinary railways. Compared to conventional rail, HSR faces more competition from transport such as aviation, since its faster speed. Designing an industrial organization structure suitable for HSR is a key issue to be solved in furthering the reform of the China railway industry. By constructing a Salop model with horizontal differentiation, we analyze the economic effects of implementing different industrial organization structures for HSR under the condition of inter-modal competition. The study found that introducing train operators or establishing regional companies may lead to foreclosure effects under the vertical integration (VI) structure. Under the vertical separation (VS) structure, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies can promote competition, but it easily leads to double marginalization problem. Regardless of the structure, whether VI or VS, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies also has lock-in effects on some HSR passengers. These effects lead to higher fares, which harm consumer surplus, but it may not necessarily improve the profits of the entire HSR industry. In general, maintaining the VI or implementing the complete VS (including simple VS and introducing train operators under VS structure) can obtain better social welfare under certain conditions, depending on the cost difference of various transport modes. According to this conclusion and the situation in China, we have proposed several directional recommendations for the future reform.

模式间竞争下的中国高铁产业组织结构改革
中国拥有不同于普通铁路的独立高速铁路(高铁)系统。与传统铁路相比,高铁由于速度更快,面临着更多来自航空等交通工具的竞争。设计适合高铁的产业组织结构是推进中国铁路产业改革亟待解决的关键问题。通过构建横向分化的 Salop 模型,我们分析了高铁在多式联运竞争条件下实施不同产业组织结构的经济效应。研究发现,在纵向一体化(VI)结构下,引入列车运营商或建立区域公司可能会导致赎回效应。在纵向分离(VS)结构下,引入列车运营商或成立地区公司可以促进竞争,但容易导致双重边缘化问题。无论是纵向一体化结构还是纵向分离结构,引入列车运营商或成立区域公司都会对部分高铁乘客产生锁定效应。这些效应会导致票价上涨,损害消费者剩余,但不一定会提高整个高铁行业的利润。总体而言,在一定条件下,维持VI或实施完全VS(包括简单VS和在VS结构下引入列车运营商)可以获得更好的社会福利,这取决于各种交通方式的成本差异。根据这一结论和中国的国情,我们提出了未来改革的几个方向性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信