{"title":"China's high-speed rail industrial organization structure reform under inter-modal competition","authors":"Xiaoqi Wang , Honghai Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China has an independent high-speed railway (HSR) system that is different from ordinary railways. Compared to conventional rail, HSR faces more competition from transport such as aviation, since its faster speed. Designing an industrial organization structure suitable for HSR is a key issue to be solved in furthering the reform of the China railway industry. By constructing a Salop model with horizontal differentiation, we analyze the economic effects of implementing different industrial organization structures for HSR under the condition of inter-modal competition. The study found that introducing train operators or establishing regional companies may lead to foreclosure effects under the vertical integration (VI) structure. Under the vertical separation (VS) structure, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies can promote competition, but it easily leads to double marginalization problem. Regardless of the structure, whether VI or VS, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies also has lock-in effects on some HSR passengers. These effects lead to higher fares, which harm consumer surplus, but it may not necessarily improve the profits of the entire HSR industry. In general, maintaining the VI or implementing the complete VS (including simple VS and introducing train operators under VS structure) can obtain better social welfare under certain conditions, depending on the cost difference of various transport modes. According to this conclusion and the situation in China, we have proposed several directional recommendations for the future reform.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101114"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China has an independent high-speed railway (HSR) system that is different from ordinary railways. Compared to conventional rail, HSR faces more competition from transport such as aviation, since its faster speed. Designing an industrial organization structure suitable for HSR is a key issue to be solved in furthering the reform of the China railway industry. By constructing a Salop model with horizontal differentiation, we analyze the economic effects of implementing different industrial organization structures for HSR under the condition of inter-modal competition. The study found that introducing train operators or establishing regional companies may lead to foreclosure effects under the vertical integration (VI) structure. Under the vertical separation (VS) structure, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies can promote competition, but it easily leads to double marginalization problem. Regardless of the structure, whether VI or VS, introducing train operators or establishing regional companies also has lock-in effects on some HSR passengers. These effects lead to higher fares, which harm consumer surplus, but it may not necessarily improve the profits of the entire HSR industry. In general, maintaining the VI or implementing the complete VS (including simple VS and introducing train operators under VS structure) can obtain better social welfare under certain conditions, depending on the cost difference of various transport modes. According to this conclusion and the situation in China, we have proposed several directional recommendations for the future reform.
期刊介绍:
Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector