Previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and their impact on the protection from reinfection during the Omicron BA.5 wave – a nested case-control study among vaccinated adults in Sweden

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Fredrik Kahn , Carl Bonander , Mahnaz Moghaddassi , Claus Bohn Christiansen , Louise Bennet , Ulf Malmqvist , Malin Inghammar , Jonas Björk
{"title":"Previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and their impact on the protection from reinfection during the Omicron BA.5 wave – a nested case-control study among vaccinated adults in Sweden","authors":"Fredrik Kahn ,&nbsp;Carl Bonander ,&nbsp;Mahnaz Moghaddassi ,&nbsp;Claus Bohn Christiansen ,&nbsp;Louise Bennet ,&nbsp;Ulf Malmqvist ,&nbsp;Malin Inghammar ,&nbsp;Jonas Björk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We evaluated the protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity against reinfection among working-age vaccinated individuals during a calendar period from June to December 2022 when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania County, Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study cohort (n = 71,592) mainly consisted of health care workers. We analyzed 4144 infected cases during the Omicron BA.5 dominance and 41,440 sex- and age-matched controls with conditional logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average protection against reinfection was marginal (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-23%) during the study period but substantially higher for recent infections. Recent infection (3-6 months) with Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 offered strong protection (86%, 95% CI 68-94% and 78%, 95% CI 69-84%), whereas more distant infection (6-12 months) with Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and the variants before Omicron offered marginal or no protection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings suggest that infection-induced immunity contributes to short-term population protection against infection with the subvariant BA.5 among working-age vaccinated individuals but wanes considerably with time, independent of the virus variant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000146/pdfft?md5=5f2aa8cc6b3a6ef8160f9ffaccb38b9a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000146-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated the protection afforded by SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity against reinfection among working-age vaccinated individuals during a calendar period from June to December 2022 when Omicron BA.5 was the dominating subvariant in Scania County, Sweden.

Methods

The study cohort (n = 71,592) mainly consisted of health care workers. We analyzed 4144 infected cases during the Omicron BA.5 dominance and 41,440 sex- and age-matched controls with conditional logistic regression.

Results

The average protection against reinfection was marginal (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-23%) during the study period but substantially higher for recent infections. Recent infection (3-6 months) with Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 offered strong protection (86%, 95% CI 68-94% and 78%, 95% CI 69-84%), whereas more distant infection (6-12 months) with Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and the variants before Omicron offered marginal or no protection.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that infection-induced immunity contributes to short-term population protection against infection with the subvariant BA.5 among working-age vaccinated individuals but wanes considerably with time, independent of the virus variant.

在 Omicron BA.5 疫潮期间曾感染过 SARS-CoV-2 及其对再感染保护的影响--对瑞典已接种疫苗的成年人进行的巢式病例对照研究
目的我们评估了 2022 年 6 月至 12 月 Omicron BA.5 亚变异体在瑞典斯堪尼亚县占主导地位期间,SARS-CoV-2 感染引起的免疫对工作年龄接种者再感染的保护作用。我们通过条件逻辑回归分析了在 Omicron BA.5 占主导地位期间的 4144 例感染病例和 41440 例性别和年龄匹配的对照病例。近期(3-6 个月)感染 Omicron BA.2 和 BA.5 可提供较强的保护(86%,95% CI 68-94% 和 78%,95% CI 69-84%),而较远期(6-12 个月)感染 Omicron BA.1、BA.2 和 Omicron 之前的变种可提供微弱保护或无保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信