Social robots counselling in community pharmacies – Helping or harming? A qualitative study of pharmacists' views

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sara Rosenberg , Malin Andtfolk , Susanne Hägglund , Mattias Wingren , Linda Nyholm
{"title":"Social robots counselling in community pharmacies – Helping or harming? A qualitative study of pharmacists' views","authors":"Sara Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Malin Andtfolk ,&nbsp;Susanne Hägglund ,&nbsp;Mattias Wingren ,&nbsp;Linda Nyholm","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Welfare technological solutions such as social robots attempt to meet the growing needs of the healthcare sector. Social robots may be able to respond to the shortage of pharmaceutical personnel at community pharmacies. However, there is a lack of previous studies regarding the use of social robots for medication counselling purposes in a pharmacy setting.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this qualitative study was to explore pharmacists' views on the potential role of social robots in medication counselling.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pharmacists, purposively sampled based on having recent experience of counselling customers in community pharmacies in Finland, first acted as customers interacting with the social robot in a simulated setting, before taking part in a focus group where their perspectives were explored. The focus group discussions were conducted in October and November 2022. The qualitative data was transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of participants was eight in total. A main theme of how the robot may either help or harm concerning medication safety within a pharmacy setting was identified. The six sub-themes found, according to pharmacists' views on robot counselling in community pharmacies, are context, digital competence, customer integrity, interaction, pharmacists' professional role and human skills.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>According to the study findings, pharmacists experience that the social robot can offer a potential complement to a human pharmacist. The robot is seen as beneficial with respect to certain customer groups and in the light of personnel shortages, and may in the future add to trust, equality, freedom of choice and multilingualism, among other things, in the customer service situation at community pharmacies, thus improving medication safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000209/pdfft?md5=aefadafb3d6006bc8db88098edfcf1f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Welfare technological solutions such as social robots attempt to meet the growing needs of the healthcare sector. Social robots may be able to respond to the shortage of pharmaceutical personnel at community pharmacies. However, there is a lack of previous studies regarding the use of social robots for medication counselling purposes in a pharmacy setting.

Objectives

The objective of this qualitative study was to explore pharmacists' views on the potential role of social robots in medication counselling.

Methods

Pharmacists, purposively sampled based on having recent experience of counselling customers in community pharmacies in Finland, first acted as customers interacting with the social robot in a simulated setting, before taking part in a focus group where their perspectives were explored. The focus group discussions were conducted in October and November 2022. The qualitative data was transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

The number of participants was eight in total. A main theme of how the robot may either help or harm concerning medication safety within a pharmacy setting was identified. The six sub-themes found, according to pharmacists' views on robot counselling in community pharmacies, are context, digital competence, customer integrity, interaction, pharmacists' professional role and human skills.

Conclusions

According to the study findings, pharmacists experience that the social robot can offer a potential complement to a human pharmacist. The robot is seen as beneficial with respect to certain customer groups and in the light of personnel shortages, and may in the future add to trust, equality, freedom of choice and multilingualism, among other things, in the customer service situation at community pharmacies, thus improving medication safety.

社区药房的社会机器人咨询--是帮助还是伤害?药剂师观点的定性研究
背景社交机器人等福利技术解决方案试图满足医疗保健行业日益增长的需求。社交机器人或许能解决社区药房药剂师短缺的问题。本定性研究的目的是探讨药剂师对社交机器人在药物咨询中的潜在作用的看法。方法药剂师是根据最近在芬兰社区药房为顾客提供咨询的经验有目的地抽取的,他们首先在模拟环境中扮演与社交机器人互动的顾客,然后参加焦点小组讨论,探讨他们的观点。焦点小组讨论于 2022 年 10 月和 11 月进行。对定性数据进行了转录,并采用反思性主题分析方法进行了分析。讨论确定了一个主题,即机器人如何帮助或损害药房内的用药安全。根据药剂师对社区药房机器人咨询的看法,发现了六个次主题,分别是背景、数字能力、客户诚信、互动、药剂师的专业角色和人类技能。在某些客户群体和人员短缺的情况下,机器人被认为是有益的,未来可能会在社区药房的客户服务中增加信任、平等、选择自由和多语种等,从而提高用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信