Impact of Decompressive Craniectomy on Diagnosing Brain Death in Children.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Betül Ekici, İrem Ersayoğlu, Pınar Yazıcı Özkaya, Kübra Cebeci, Gülizar Koç, Eşe Eda Turanlı
{"title":"Impact of Decompressive Craniectomy on Diagnosing Brain Death in Children.","authors":"Betül Ekici, İrem Ersayoğlu, Pınar Yazıcı Özkaya, Kübra Cebeci, Gülizar Koç, Eşe Eda Turanlı","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of decompressive craniectomy (DC) on the brain death (BD) determination process in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All children who were diagnosed with BD in the PICU between 2009 and 2020 were included in this study. Patient demographics, causative mechanisms, BD examinations, and ancillary tests used were recorded. The time intervals (from PICU admission to first BD examination, from first BD examination to BD diagnosis) and number of BD examinations were compared between patients with and without DC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 70 pediatric cases were diagnosed with BD among 513 total deaths (13.6%). Their median age was 54.5 months [interquartile range (IQR): 24-140]. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) was performed in 66 patients (94.3%). The most common combination of ancillary tests was the apnea test and TCD combination, which was performed in 56 patients (80%). Thirty-four children (48.6%) experienced immediate surgery for DC. Patients with DC had a higher median number of BD examinations than patients without DC [3 (IQR: 2-3) vs. 2 (IQR: 1-2), P < .001]. The patients with DC had a longer time interval between the first examination and declaration of BD than patients without DC [45.5 hours (IQR: 21.7-91.7) versus 15 hours (IQR: 2-31.2), P < .006].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decompressive craniectomy may complicate BD determination and cause challenges for brain death diagnosis based on cerebral flow imaging techniques. The lack of specific recommendations for this patient group in the guidelines causes a delayed diagnosis of BD. Cite this article as: Ekici B, Ersayoğlu İ, Yazıcı Özkaya P, Cebeci K, Koç G, Turanlı EE. Impact of decompressive craniectomy on diagnosing brain death in children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):93-97.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10837520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of decompressive craniectomy (DC) on the brain death (BD) determination process in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Materials and methods: All children who were diagnosed with BD in the PICU between 2009 and 2020 were included in this study. Patient demographics, causative mechanisms, BD examinations, and ancillary tests used were recorded. The time intervals (from PICU admission to first BD examination, from first BD examination to BD diagnosis) and number of BD examinations were compared between patients with and without DC.

Results: During the study period, 70 pediatric cases were diagnosed with BD among 513 total deaths (13.6%). Their median age was 54.5 months [interquartile range (IQR): 24-140]. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) was performed in 66 patients (94.3%). The most common combination of ancillary tests was the apnea test and TCD combination, which was performed in 56 patients (80%). Thirty-four children (48.6%) experienced immediate surgery for DC. Patients with DC had a higher median number of BD examinations than patients without DC [3 (IQR: 2-3) vs. 2 (IQR: 1-2), P < .001]. The patients with DC had a longer time interval between the first examination and declaration of BD than patients without DC [45.5 hours (IQR: 21.7-91.7) versus 15 hours (IQR: 2-31.2), P < .006].

Conclusion: Decompressive craniectomy may complicate BD determination and cause challenges for brain death diagnosis based on cerebral flow imaging techniques. The lack of specific recommendations for this patient group in the guidelines causes a delayed diagnosis of BD. Cite this article as: Ekici B, Ersayoğlu İ, Yazıcı Özkaya P, Cebeci K, Koç G, Turanlı EE. Impact of decompressive craniectomy on diagnosing brain death in children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):93-97.

减压开颅术对诊断儿童脑死亡的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在评估减压开颅术(DC)对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)脑死亡(BD)判定过程的影响:本研究纳入了 2009 年至 2020 年期间在 PICU 诊断为脑死亡的所有患儿。研究记录了患者的人口统计学特征、致病机制、BD 检查和使用的辅助检查。比较了有 DC 和无 DC 患者的时间间隔(从 PICU 入院到首次 BD 检查,从首次 BD 检查到 BD 诊断)和 BD 检查次数:在研究期间,513 例死亡病例中有 70 例儿科病例被确诊为 BD(占 13.6%)。他们的中位年龄为 54.5 个月[四分位距(IQR):24-140]。66名患者(94.3%)进行了经颅多普勒超声(TCD)检查。最常见的辅助检查组合是呼吸暂停试验和 TCD 组合,56 名患者(80%)接受了该组合。34名儿童(48.6%)因直流电而立即接受了手术。直流电患者接受 BD 检查的中位数高于非直流电患者 [3 (IQR: 2-3) vs. 2 (IQR: 1-2), P < .001]。与非 DC 患者相比,DC 患者从首次检查到宣布 BD 的时间间隔更长[45.5 小时(IQR:21.7-91.7)对 15 小时(IQR:2-31.2),P <.006]:结论:颅骨减压切除术可能会使脑死亡的判定复杂化,并给基于脑血流成像技术的脑死亡诊断带来挑战。指南中缺乏针对这一患者群体的具体建议,导致了 BD 诊断的延迟。本文引用如前:Ekici B, Ersayoğlu İ, Yazıcı Özkaya P, Cebeci K, Koç G, Turanlı EE.减压开颅术对诊断儿童脑死亡的影响。Turk Arch Pediatr.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信