Pitfalls and pearls in diagnosing inflammatory arthritis in older patients

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Justin Levinson , Bjoern Buehring
{"title":"Pitfalls and pearls in diagnosing inflammatory arthritis in older patients","authors":"Justin Levinson ,&nbsp;Bjoern Buehring","doi":"10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given current demographic shifts, the number of older adults continues to grow, with almost half of patients over 65 being diagnosed with some form of arthritis. Rheumatic diseases pose unique diagnostic challenges in older patients due to the convergence of physiologic changes of aging, confounding difficulties to care, and atypical disease manifestations. This review summarizes the current published evidence to guide clinicians in evaluating geriatric patients with rheumatologic concerns, focusing on inflammatory arthritis. Using the background of epidemiologic data on various musculoskeletal diseases, clinical presentations, current diagnostic tests, and known physiologic changes of aging, this review highlights five diagnostic pitfalls in inflammatory polyarthritis among older patients. The pitfalls include: 1) broader differential diagnosis; 2) atypical presentations; 3) communication, cognitive, and social impairments; 4) the role of chronological vs. biological age; and 5) anchoring bias by assuming older adults are simply “older young adults”. These pitfalls are discussed in the context of geriatric principles such as the “hallmarks of aging” and the expected pathophysiologic changes of organ systems. Furthermore, the review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic tests used in arthritis and introduces some of the geriatric assessment tools that systematically evaluate multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes. With familiarity of the potential diagnostic pitfalls, knowledge of both normal and pathologic aging processes, awareness of the difference between biological and chronological age, and the ability to use geriatric assessment tools to better characterize older patients, clinicians will be better able to diagnose and manage rheumatic conditions in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54902,"journal":{"name":"Joint Bone Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Bone Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given current demographic shifts, the number of older adults continues to grow, with almost half of patients over 65 being diagnosed with some form of arthritis. Rheumatic diseases pose unique diagnostic challenges in older patients due to the convergence of physiologic changes of aging, confounding difficulties to care, and atypical disease manifestations. This review summarizes the current published evidence to guide clinicians in evaluating geriatric patients with rheumatologic concerns, focusing on inflammatory arthritis. Using the background of epidemiologic data on various musculoskeletal diseases, clinical presentations, current diagnostic tests, and known physiologic changes of aging, this review highlights five diagnostic pitfalls in inflammatory polyarthritis among older patients. The pitfalls include: 1) broader differential diagnosis; 2) atypical presentations; 3) communication, cognitive, and social impairments; 4) the role of chronological vs. biological age; and 5) anchoring bias by assuming older adults are simply “older young adults”. These pitfalls are discussed in the context of geriatric principles such as the “hallmarks of aging” and the expected pathophysiologic changes of organ systems. Furthermore, the review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic tests used in arthritis and introduces some of the geriatric assessment tools that systematically evaluate multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes. With familiarity of the potential diagnostic pitfalls, knowledge of both normal and pathologic aging processes, awareness of the difference between biological and chronological age, and the ability to use geriatric assessment tools to better characterize older patients, clinicians will be better able to diagnose and manage rheumatic conditions in this population.

诊断老年炎症性关节炎的误区和要点。
鉴于当前人口结构的变化,老年人的数量持续增长,65 岁以上的患者中几乎有一半被诊断患有某种形式的关节炎。风湿性疾病给老年患者的诊断带来了独特的挑战,这是因为老年患者的生理变化、护理困难和非典型疾病表现等因素交织在一起。本综述总结了目前已发表的证据,以指导临床医生对患有风湿病的老年患者进行评估,重点关注炎症性关节炎。本综述以各种肌肉骨骼疾病的流行病学数据、临床表现、目前的诊断测试以及已知的衰老生理变化为背景,重点介绍了老年炎性多关节炎的五个诊断误区。这些误区包括1) 更广泛的鉴别诊断;2) 不典型的表现;3) 交流、认知和社交障碍;4) 时间年龄与生理年龄的作用;5) 假定老年人只是 "年老的年轻人 "的锚定偏差‿ 这些误区是在老年医学原则(如 "衰老的标志‿ 和器官系统的预期病理生理变化)的背景下讨论的。此外,综述还讨论了关节炎诊断测试的优缺点,并介绍了一些系统评估多病和老年综合征的老年病评估工具。熟悉潜在的诊断误区,了解正常和病理衰老过程,意识到生理年龄和计时年龄之间的差异,并能使用老年评估工具更好地描述老年患者的特征,临床医生就能更好地诊断和管理这一人群的风湿病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joint Bone Spine
Joint Bone Spine 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Bimonthly e-only international journal, Joint Bone Spine publishes in English original research articles and all the latest advances that deal with disorders affecting the joints, bones, and spine and, more generally, the entire field of rheumatology. All submitted manuscripts to the journal are subjected to rigorous peer review by international experts: under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. (Surgical techniques and work focusing specifically on orthopedic surgery are not within the scope of the journal.)Joint Bone Spine is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信