Does stress response axis activation differ between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people?

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stress and Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1002/smi.3392
Eva Montero-López, María Isabel Peralta-Ramírez, Norberto Ortego-Centeno, José Mario Sabio, José Luis Callejas-Rubio, Nuria Navarrete-Navarrete, M Carmen García-Ríos, Ana Santos-Ruiz
{"title":"Does stress response axis activation differ between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people?","authors":"Eva Montero-López, María Isabel Peralta-Ramírez, Norberto Ortego-Centeno, José Mario Sabio, José Luis Callejas-Rubio, Nuria Navarrete-Navarrete, M Carmen García-Ríos, Ana Santos-Ruiz","doi":"10.1002/smi.3392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies have shown that patients with autoimmune disease present a hypoactive hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but the results are controversial. Our objective was to study differences in stress response axis activity between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people. The study sample consisted of 97 women divided into four groups: 37 healthy women (HW), 21 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 with Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and 18 with systemic sclerosis (SSc). After being exposed to a stress task, participants' skin conductance and salivary cortisol levels were measured in order to assess their response to psychological stress. Diurnal cortisol concentrations were assessed by measuring salivary cortisol in samples collected five times over one day. In addition, self-administered questionnaires were used to assess psychological variables. A time × group interaction effect was found (p = 0.003) in salivary cortisol secretion in response to stressful challenge. The healthy group presented normal activation, the SS and SLE groups showed no activation, and the SSc group presented a similar activation pattern to the HW group, except at the time of recovery. Total cortisol production (AUCg) was higher in the SSc group than in the HW group (p = 0.001). Differences were also observed in the cortisol AUCg collected over one day between healthy women and patients with SLE (p = 0.004) as well as with SSc (p = 0.001): women with SLE and SSc presented higher total hormone production than healthy women. Patients with autoimmune disease present a different HPA axis response, which may contribute to the harmful effects of stress in these diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have shown that patients with autoimmune disease present a hypoactive hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but the results are controversial. Our objective was to study differences in stress response axis activity between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people. The study sample consisted of 97 women divided into four groups: 37 healthy women (HW), 21 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 with Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and 18 with systemic sclerosis (SSc). After being exposed to a stress task, participants' skin conductance and salivary cortisol levels were measured in order to assess their response to psychological stress. Diurnal cortisol concentrations were assessed by measuring salivary cortisol in samples collected five times over one day. In addition, self-administered questionnaires were used to assess psychological variables. A time × group interaction effect was found (p = 0.003) in salivary cortisol secretion in response to stressful challenge. The healthy group presented normal activation, the SS and SLE groups showed no activation, and the SSc group presented a similar activation pattern to the HW group, except at the time of recovery. Total cortisol production (AUCg) was higher in the SSc group than in the HW group (p = 0.001). Differences were also observed in the cortisol AUCg collected over one day between healthy women and patients with SLE (p = 0.004) as well as with SSc (p = 0.001): women with SLE and SSc presented higher total hormone production than healthy women. Patients with autoimmune disease present a different HPA axis response, which may contribute to the harmful effects of stress in these diseases.

自身免疫性疾病患者和健康人的应激反应轴激活是否存在差异?
许多研究表明,自身免疫性疾病患者的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴活性低下,但研究结果存在争议。我们的目的是研究自身免疫性疾病患者与健康人在应激反应轴活动方面的差异。研究样本由 97 名女性组成,分为四组:37 名健康女性(HW)、21 名系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者、21 名斯约格伦综合征(SS)患者和 18 名系统性硬化症(SSc)患者。在接受一项压力任务后,测量了参与者的皮肤传导和唾液皮质醇水平,以评估他们对心理压力的反应。通过测量一天内采集五次的唾液皮质醇样本来评估皮质醇的昼夜浓度。此外,还采用了自填式问卷来评估心理变量。结果发现,唾液皮质醇分泌对压力挑战的反应存在时间×组别的交互效应(p = 0.003)。健康组呈现正常激活,SS 和系统性红斑狼疮组无激活,而 SSc 组除恢复期外,激活模式与 HW 组相似。SSc 组的皮质醇总分泌量(AUCg)高于 HW 组(P = 0.001)。健康女性与系统性红斑狼疮患者(p = 0.004)和系统性红斑狼疮患者(p = 0.001)在一天内采集的皮质醇 AUCg 值也存在差异:系统性红斑狼疮和系统性红斑狼疮女性患者的激素总分泌量高于健康女性。自身免疫性疾病患者的 HPA 轴反应不同,这可能是压力对这些疾病产生有害影响的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信