Examining the Relationship Between Nurse Fatigue, Alertness, and Medication Errors.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1177/01939459241236631
Amany Farag, Jacob Gallagher, Lucas Carr
{"title":"Examining the Relationship Between Nurse Fatigue, Alertness, and Medication Errors.","authors":"Amany Farag, Jacob Gallagher, Lucas Carr","doi":"10.1177/01939459241236631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Working for extended hours in a physically and mentally demanding profession has subjected nurses to occupational fatigue. Limited evidence exists about nurse fatigue and alertness changes throughout shift work and their relationship with medication errors and near misses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purposes of this study were to: (1) assess the relationship between nurses' fatigue and alertness, (2) evaluate nurses' fatigue and alertness changes throughout their shift, and (3) examine the relationship between nurses' fatigue, alertness, and medication errors and near misses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study is part of a larger mixed-method study. Fatigue and alertness data from 14 work and non-workdays were collected from a convenience sample of 90 nurses. A wearable actigraph (Readiband<sup>TM</sup>) was used to measure alertness, while ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using text messaging was used to measure nurses' fatigue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 1-unit increase in fatigue was associated with a 1.06-unit reduction in nurses' alertness score (β = -1.06, 95% CI: [-1.33, -0.78], <i>p</i> < .01). Night-shift nurses experienced a 31-point reduction in alertness from the start to the end of the work shift. Nurses' fatigue, but not alertness, was associated with medication errors and near misses (OR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.07, 1.48], <i>p</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiating fatigue mitigation measures during mid-shift, especially for night-shift nurses, may be a viable option to mitigate fatigue and alertness deterioration among nurses and to maintain patient safety. The multifaceted nature of fatigue, as captured by EMA, is a stronger predictor of medication errors and near misses than device-measured alertness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241236631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Working for extended hours in a physically and mentally demanding profession has subjected nurses to occupational fatigue. Limited evidence exists about nurse fatigue and alertness changes throughout shift work and their relationship with medication errors and near misses.

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to: (1) assess the relationship between nurses' fatigue and alertness, (2) evaluate nurses' fatigue and alertness changes throughout their shift, and (3) examine the relationship between nurses' fatigue, alertness, and medication errors and near misses.

Methods: This prospective study is part of a larger mixed-method study. Fatigue and alertness data from 14 work and non-workdays were collected from a convenience sample of 90 nurses. A wearable actigraph (ReadibandTM) was used to measure alertness, while ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using text messaging was used to measure nurses' fatigue.

Results: A 1-unit increase in fatigue was associated with a 1.06-unit reduction in nurses' alertness score (β = -1.06, 95% CI: [-1.33, -0.78], p < .01). Night-shift nurses experienced a 31-point reduction in alertness from the start to the end of the work shift. Nurses' fatigue, but not alertness, was associated with medication errors and near misses (OR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.07, 1.48], p = .01).

Conclusion: Initiating fatigue mitigation measures during mid-shift, especially for night-shift nurses, may be a viable option to mitigate fatigue and alertness deterioration among nurses and to maintain patient safety. The multifaceted nature of fatigue, as captured by EMA, is a stronger predictor of medication errors and near misses than device-measured alertness.

研究护士疲劳、警觉性和用药错误之间的关系。
背景:长时间的体力和脑力工作使护士产生职业疲劳。关于护士在整个轮班工作期间的疲劳和警觉性变化及其与用药错误和险些失误之间关系的证据有限:(目的:本研究的目的是:(1)评估护士疲劳与警觉性之间的关系;(2)评估护士在整个轮班过程中疲劳与警觉性的变化;(3)研究护士疲劳、警觉性与用药错误和险些失误之间的关系:这项前瞻性研究是一项大型混合方法研究的一部分。方法:这项前瞻性研究是大型混合方法研究的一部分,从方便抽样的 90 名护士中收集了 14 个工作日和非工作日的疲劳和警觉性数据。使用可穿戴式行动记录仪(ReadibandTM)测量警觉性,同时使用短信生态瞬间评估(EMA)测量护士的疲劳程度:结果:疲劳度每增加 1 个单位,护士的警觉性得分就会降低 1.06 个单位(β = -1.06, 95% CI: [-1.33, -0.78],p < .01)。夜班护士的警觉性从轮班开始到结束降低了 31 分。护士的疲劳度(而非警觉度)与用药错误和险些失误有关(OR = 1.26,95% CI [1.07,1.48],p = .01):结论:在中班时采取缓解疲劳的措施,尤其是对夜班护士而言,可能是缓解护士疲劳和警觉性下降并维护患者安全的可行方案。EMA 所反映的疲劳的多面性比设备测量的警觉性更能预测用药错误和险情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信