Pain catastrophizing in the elderly: An experimental pain study.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0035
Laura Petrini, Lars Arendt-Nielsen
{"title":"Pain catastrophizing in the elderly: An experimental pain study.","authors":"Laura Petrini, Lars Arendt-Nielsen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain catastrophizing in the aging population has not been studied in great detail. Existing investigations have reported conflicting results on the effects of age on pain catastrophizing in relation to pain responses. This study investigated the relationship between pain catastrophizing, and its individual components (rumination, magnification, and helplessness), and the responses to standardized experimental pain stimuli in old and young, healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six volunteers (32 old: 65-87, 18 females; 34 young: 20-35, 17 females) participated in the study. Pain catastrophizing including the components of rumination, magnification, and helplessness was assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Experimental pain was induced by applying predefined pressure stimulations to the trapezius muscle. Pain intensity and unpleasantness were assessed using numerical rating scales. Pain catastrophizing levels and pain responses were statistically compared between the two age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elderly individuals reported significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.028) lower scores of pain catastrophizing (Med = 5; interquartile range [IQR] = 14) than younger individuals; this difference was driven by the significantly lower components of rumination (Med = 2; IQR = 4; <i>p</i> = 0.017) and helplessness (Med = 2; IQR = 7; <i>p</i> = 0.049). A larger proportion of young (57.8%) rated pain catastrophizing at high levels, with scores above the 75th percentile (Med = 20). Additionally, elderly reported the lowest pain intensity (Med = 5; <i>p</i> = 0.034) and pain unpleasantness (Med = 4.5; <i>p</i> = 0.011) responses to the experimental pressure stimuli. In the elderly group, pain unpleasantness was positively and significantly associated with pain catastrophizing (<i>r</i> <sub>s</sub> = 0.416, <i>p</i> = 0.021), rumination (<i>r</i> <sub>s</sub> = 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.019), and helplessness (<i>r</i> <sub>s</sub> = 0.434, <i>p</i> = 0.015), respectively. No associations were found in the young group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly reported lower PCSs than young adults. Rumination and helplessness were reduced in the elderly group. The elderly population showed positive correlations between catastrophizing levels and pain unpleasantness to standardized pressure pain stimuli. Results supported the view that elderly possess resilience over specific domains of pain catastrophizing that could counteract pain perception due to physiological decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pain catastrophizing in the aging population has not been studied in great detail. Existing investigations have reported conflicting results on the effects of age on pain catastrophizing in relation to pain responses. This study investigated the relationship between pain catastrophizing, and its individual components (rumination, magnification, and helplessness), and the responses to standardized experimental pain stimuli in old and young, healthy adults.

Methods: Sixty-six volunteers (32 old: 65-87, 18 females; 34 young: 20-35, 17 females) participated in the study. Pain catastrophizing including the components of rumination, magnification, and helplessness was assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Experimental pain was induced by applying predefined pressure stimulations to the trapezius muscle. Pain intensity and unpleasantness were assessed using numerical rating scales. Pain catastrophizing levels and pain responses were statistically compared between the two age groups.

Results: Elderly individuals reported significantly (p = 0.028) lower scores of pain catastrophizing (Med = 5; interquartile range [IQR] = 14) than younger individuals; this difference was driven by the significantly lower components of rumination (Med = 2; IQR = 4; p = 0.017) and helplessness (Med = 2; IQR = 7; p = 0.049). A larger proportion of young (57.8%) rated pain catastrophizing at high levels, with scores above the 75th percentile (Med = 20). Additionally, elderly reported the lowest pain intensity (Med = 5; p = 0.034) and pain unpleasantness (Med = 4.5; p = 0.011) responses to the experimental pressure stimuli. In the elderly group, pain unpleasantness was positively and significantly associated with pain catastrophizing (r s = 0.416, p = 0.021), rumination (r s = 0.42, p = 0.019), and helplessness (r s = 0.434, p = 0.015), respectively. No associations were found in the young group.

Conclusions: Elderly reported lower PCSs than young adults. Rumination and helplessness were reduced in the elderly group. The elderly population showed positive correlations between catastrophizing levels and pain unpleasantness to standardized pressure pain stimuli. Results supported the view that elderly possess resilience over specific domains of pain catastrophizing that could counteract pain perception due to physiological decline.

老年人的疼痛灾难化:疼痛实验研究
目的:目前尚未对老龄人口的疼痛灾难化问题进行详细研究。关于年龄对疼痛灾难化的影响与疼痛反应的关系,现有调查报告的结果相互矛盾。本研究调查了疼痛灾难化及其各个组成部分(反刍、放大和无助)与老年人和年轻健康成年人对标准化实验性疼痛刺激的反应之间的关系:66 名志愿者(32 名老年志愿者:65-87 岁,18 名女性;34 名青年志愿者:20-35 岁,17 名女性)参加了研究。疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)评估了疼痛灾难化,包括反刍、放大和无助。实验性疼痛是通过对斜方肌施加预定的压力刺激诱发的。疼痛强度和难受程度采用数字评分量表进行评估。对两个年龄组的疼痛灾难化水平和疼痛反应进行统计比较:结果:老年人的疼痛灾难化评分(Med = 5;四分位数间距 [IQR] = 14)明显低于年轻人(p = 0.028);这一差异是由明显较低的反刍(Med = 2;IQR = 4;p = 0.017)和无助(Med = 2;IQR = 7;p = 0.049)造成的。较大比例的年轻人(57.8%)将疼痛灾难化评为较高水平,得分超过第 75 百分位数(中位数 = 20)。此外,老年人对实验性压力刺激的疼痛强度(Med = 5;p = 0.034)和疼痛不适感(Med = 4.5;p = 0.011)反应最低。在老年人组中,疼痛不适感分别与疼痛灾难化(r s = 0.416,p = 0.021)、反刍(r s = 0.42,p = 0.019)和无助感(r s = 0.434,p = 0.015)呈显著正相关。结论:结论:老年人报告的 PCSs 低于年轻人。老年人组的反刍和无助感减少。在标准化压痛刺激下,老年人群的灾难化水平与疼痛不快感呈正相关。研究结果支持这样一种观点,即老年人在疼痛灾难化的特定领域具有恢复能力,可以抵消生理衰退导致的疼痛感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信