[Role of General Anesthesia and Rapid On-site Evaluation 
in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer with EBUS-TBNA].

Q4 Medicine
Yuhe Hu, Yuying Li
{"title":"[Role of General Anesthesia and Rapid On-site Evaluation \u2029in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer with EBUS-TBNA].","authors":"Yuhe Hu, Yuying Li","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is a common malignant tumor of respiratory system. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA is predominantly performed under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. However, the diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA under general anesthesia and in conjunction with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the value of general anesthesia and ROSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer with EBUS-TBNA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 164 patients treated in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022. All patients were preoperatively suspected of lung cancer and underwent EBUS-TBNA. Based on whether they received general anesthesia and ROSE, the patients were divided into three groups: local anesthesia group (LA group)(n=54), general anesthesia group (GA group)(n=67) and general anesthesia with ROSE group (GA-ROSE group)(n=43). The puncture characteristics and diagnostic differences were analyzed among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of lymph node puncture needles in the LA group was higher than in GA-ROSE group (P<0.01). The overall diagnostic rates of EBUS-TBNA for the three groups were 87.04%, 89.55% and 90.70%, respectively, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 88.24%, 88.89% and 94.74%. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups (P>0.05). There were no instances of severe complications or adverse anesthesia reactions in any of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the combination of local anesthesia with intravenous analgesia and sedation, the implementation of EBUS-TBNA under general anesthesia, with or without ROSE, achieves equally accurate results, and general anesthesia combined with ROSE can reduce in the number of lymph node puncture needles.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10918246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is a common malignant tumor of respiratory system. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA is predominantly performed under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. However, the diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA under general anesthesia and in conjunction with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the value of general anesthesia and ROSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer with EBUS-TBNA.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 164 patients treated in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022. All patients were preoperatively suspected of lung cancer and underwent EBUS-TBNA. Based on whether they received general anesthesia and ROSE, the patients were divided into three groups: local anesthesia group (LA group)(n=54), general anesthesia group (GA group)(n=67) and general anesthesia with ROSE group (GA-ROSE group)(n=43). The puncture characteristics and diagnostic differences were analyzed among the groups.

Results: The number of lymph node puncture needles in the LA group was higher than in GA-ROSE group (P<0.01). The overall diagnostic rates of EBUS-TBNA for the three groups were 87.04%, 89.55% and 90.70%, respectively, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 88.24%, 88.89% and 94.74%. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups (P>0.05). There were no instances of severe complications or adverse anesthesia reactions in any of the groups.

Conclusions: Compared to the combination of local anesthesia with intravenous analgesia and sedation, the implementation of EBUS-TBNA under general anesthesia, with or without ROSE, achieves equally accurate results, and general anesthesia combined with ROSE can reduce in the number of lymph node puncture needles.

[全身麻醉和快速现场评估在 EBUS-TBNA 诊断肺癌中的作用]。
背景:肺癌是呼吸系统常见的恶性肿瘤:肺癌是呼吸系统常见的恶性肿瘤。支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术(EBUS-TBNA)是诊断和分期肺癌的重要工具。EBUS-TBNA 主要在局部麻醉或有意识镇静的情况下进行。然而,EBUS-TBNA 在全身麻醉下结合快速现场评估(ROSE)的诊断效果仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨全身麻醉和 ROSE 对 EBUS-TBNA 诊断肺癌的价值:对2018年1月至2022年12月在西南医科大学附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科接受治疗的164例患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者术前均怀疑肺癌并接受了 EBUS-TBNA。根据是否接受全身麻醉和ROSE,将患者分为三组:局麻组(LA组)(n=54)、全身麻醉组(GA组)(n=67)和全身麻醉加ROSE组(GA-ROSE组)(n=43)。分析了各组的穿刺特点和诊断差异:LA组淋巴结穿刺针数高于GA-ROSE组(P0.05)。各组均未出现严重并发症或麻醉不良反应:结论:与局部麻醉联合静脉镇痛和镇静相比,在全身麻醉下实施 EBUS-TBNA,无论是否使用 ROSE,都能获得同样准确的结果,而且全身麻醉联合 ROSE 可以减少淋巴结穿刺针的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信