Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2322890
Gabrielly Fernanda Silva, Lorrane Freitas Campos, Jéssica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Amaro Eduardo Tavares de Araújo, Priscilla Flávia de Melo, Luiz Gustavo Suzuki, Luiz Paulo Aniceto, Rodrigo Bazan, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a scoping review.","authors":"Gabrielly Fernanda Silva, Lorrane Freitas Campos, Jéssica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, Flávia Guirro Zuliani, Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Amaro Eduardo Tavares de Araújo, Priscilla Flávia de Melo, Luiz Gustavo Suzuki, Luiz Paulo Aniceto, Rodrigo Bazan, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2322890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Enhancing afferent information from the paretic limb can improve post-stroke motor recovery. However, uncertainties exist regarding varied sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols and their specific impacts. This study outlines the use of repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in individuals with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI Evidence Synthesis guidelines. We searched studies published until June 2023 on several databases using a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 916 studies, 52 of which were included (<i>N</i> = 1,125 participants). Approximately 53.84% of the participants were in the chronic phase, displaying moderate-to-severe functional impairment. Thirty-two studies used RPSS often combining it with task-oriented training, while 20 used rPMS as a standalone intervention. The RPSS primarily targeted the median and ulnar nerves, stimulating for an average of 92.78 min at an intensity that induced paresthesia. RPMS targeted the upper and lower limb paretic muscles, employing a 20 Hz frequency in most studies. The mean stimulation time was 12.74 min, with an intensity of 70% of the maximal stimulator output. Among the 114 variables analyzed in the 52 studies, 88 (77.20%) were in the \"s,b\" domain, with 26 (22.8%) falling under the \"d\" domain of the ICF.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols hold the potential for enhancing post-stroke motor recovery, yet optimal outcomes were obtained when integrated with intensive or task-oriented motor training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2322890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Enhancing afferent information from the paretic limb can improve post-stroke motor recovery. However, uncertainties exist regarding varied sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols and their specific impacts. This study outlines the use of repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in individuals with stroke.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI Evidence Synthesis guidelines. We searched studies published until June 2023 on several databases using a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing.

Results: We identified 916 studies, 52 of which were included (N = 1,125 participants). Approximately 53.84% of the participants were in the chronic phase, displaying moderate-to-severe functional impairment. Thirty-two studies used RPSS often combining it with task-oriented training, while 20 used rPMS as a standalone intervention. The RPSS primarily targeted the median and ulnar nerves, stimulating for an average of 92.78 min at an intensity that induced paresthesia. RPMS targeted the upper and lower limb paretic muscles, employing a 20 Hz frequency in most studies. The mean stimulation time was 12.74 min, with an intensity of 70% of the maximal stimulator output. Among the 114 variables analyzed in the 52 studies, 88 (77.20%) were in the "s,b" domain, with 26 (22.8%) falling under the "d" domain of the ICF.

Discussion and conclusion: Sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols hold the potential for enhancing post-stroke motor recovery, yet optimal outcomes were obtained when integrated with intensive or task-oriented motor training.

重复性外周感觉刺激促进中风后的运动恢复:范围综述。
背景和目的:增强来自瘫痪肢体的传入信息可以改善中风后的运动恢复。然而,各种外周感觉神经调控方案及其具体影响还存在不确定性。本研究概述了重复性外周感觉刺激(RPSS)和重复性磁刺激(rPMS)在中风患者中的应用:本范围综述根据 JBI 证据合成指南进行。我们在多个数据库中检索了 2023 年 6 月之前发表的研究,并对研究进行了三步分析和分类:预分析、材料探索和数据处理:我们确定了 916 项研究,其中 52 项被纳入(N = 1 125 名参与者)。约 53.84% 的参与者处于慢性期,表现出中度至重度的功能障碍。32 项研究使用了 RPSS,通常将其与任务导向训练相结合,20 项研究使用了 rPMS 作为独立的干预措施。RPSS 主要针对正中神经和尺神经,刺激时间平均为 92.78 分钟,刺激强度可诱发麻痹。RPMS 针对上肢和下肢瘫痪肌肉,在大多数研究中采用 20 赫兹的频率。平均刺激时间为 12.74 分钟,刺激强度为刺激器最大输出功率的 70%。在 52 项研究分析的 114 个变量中,88 个(77.20%)属于 "s,b "领域,26 个(22.8%)属于 ICF 的 "d "领域:讨论与结论:感觉外周神经调控方案具有促进中风后运动恢复的潜力,但只有与强化或任务导向型运动训练相结合才能获得最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信