Diagnostic accuracy of direct reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using guanidine-based and guanidine-free inactivators for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Takashi Katsuno , Moto Kimura , Junko Terada-Hirashima , Yukumasa Kazuyama , Masato Ikeda , Ataru Moriya , Masami Kurokawa , Ayano Motohashi , Erina Isaka , Momoko Morishita , Kazuki Kawajiri , Kazuo Hakkaku , Susumu Saito , Yuriko Terayama , Yuriko Sugiura , Yoh Yamaguchi , Hiroshi Takumida , Hiromu Watanabe , Chie Morita , Akinari Tsukada , Wataru Sugiura
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of direct reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using guanidine-based and guanidine-free inactivators for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples","authors":"Takashi Katsuno ,&nbsp;Moto Kimura ,&nbsp;Junko Terada-Hirashima ,&nbsp;Yukumasa Kazuyama ,&nbsp;Masato Ikeda ,&nbsp;Ataru Moriya ,&nbsp;Masami Kurokawa ,&nbsp;Ayano Motohashi ,&nbsp;Erina Isaka ,&nbsp;Momoko Morishita ,&nbsp;Kazuki Kawajiri ,&nbsp;Kazuo Hakkaku ,&nbsp;Susumu Saito ,&nbsp;Yuriko Terayama ,&nbsp;Yuriko Sugiura ,&nbsp;Yoh Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Takumida ,&nbsp;Hiromu Watanabe ,&nbsp;Chie Morita ,&nbsp;Akinari Tsukada ,&nbsp;Wataru Sugiura","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.114909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in saliva samples treated with a guanidine-based or guanidine-free inactivator, using nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPS) as referents. Based on the NPS reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, participants were classified as with or without COVID-19. Fifty sets of samples comprising NPS, self-collected raw saliva, and saliva with a guanidine-based, and guanidine-free inactivator were collected from each group. In patients with COVID-19, the sensitivity of direct RT-PCR using raw saliva and saliva treated with a guanidine-based and guanidine-free inactivator was 100.0%, 65.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, with corresponding concordance rates of 94.3% (κ=88.5), 82.8% (κ=64.8), and 92.0% (κ=83.7). Among patients with a PCR Ct value of &lt;30 in the NPS sample, the positive predictive value for the three samples was 100.0%, 80.0%, and 96.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was lower in inactivated saliva than in raw saliva and lower in samples treated with a guanidine-based than with a guanidine-free inactivator. However, in individuals contributing to infection spread, inactivated saliva showed adequate accuracy regardless of the inactivator used. Inactivators can be added to saliva samples collected for RT-PCR to reduce viral transmission risk while maintaining adequate diagnostic accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093424000338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in saliva samples treated with a guanidine-based or guanidine-free inactivator, using nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPS) as referents. Based on the NPS reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, participants were classified as with or without COVID-19. Fifty sets of samples comprising NPS, self-collected raw saliva, and saliva with a guanidine-based, and guanidine-free inactivator were collected from each group. In patients with COVID-19, the sensitivity of direct RT-PCR using raw saliva and saliva treated with a guanidine-based and guanidine-free inactivator was 100.0%, 65.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, with corresponding concordance rates of 94.3% (κ=88.5), 82.8% (κ=64.8), and 92.0% (κ=83.7). Among patients with a PCR Ct value of <30 in the NPS sample, the positive predictive value for the three samples was 100.0%, 80.0%, and 96.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was lower in inactivated saliva than in raw saliva and lower in samples treated with a guanidine-based than with a guanidine-free inactivator. However, in individuals contributing to infection spread, inactivated saliva showed adequate accuracy regardless of the inactivator used. Inactivators can be added to saliva samples collected for RT-PCR to reduce viral transmission risk while maintaining adequate diagnostic accuracy.

使用胍基和无胍灭活剂进行直接反转录聚合酶链反应检测唾液样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性。
本研究旨在以鼻咽拭子样本(NPS)为参照物,评估经胍基或无胍灭活剂处理的唾液样本中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测的诊断准确性。根据鼻咽拭子样本的反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)结果,参与者被分为感染或未感染 COVID-19。每组收集 50 份样本,包括 NPS、自取的原始唾液、含有胍基和不含胍基的灭活剂的唾液。在 COVID-19 患者中,使用原始唾液和经胍基和无胍灭活剂处理的唾液进行直接 RT-PCR 的灵敏度分别为 100.0%、65.9% 和 82.9%,相应的吻合率分别为 94.3%(κ=88.5)、82.8%(κ=64.8)和 92.0%(κ=83.7)。在 PCR Ct 值为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery. The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of: Viral components and morphology- Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors- Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals- Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses- Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment- Viral metagenomics and virome- Virus ecology, adaption and evolution- Applied virology such as nanotechnology- Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation. We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信