Can Physical Exercise Be Considered as a Promising Enhancer of Global Cognition in People with Parkinson's Disease? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ann-Kristin Folkerts, Moritz Ernst, Romina Gollan, Nora Cryns, Ina Monsef, Nicole Skoetz, Elke Kalbe
{"title":"Can Physical Exercise Be Considered as a Promising Enhancer of Global Cognition in People with Parkinson's Disease? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ann-Kristin Folkerts, Moritz Ernst, Romina Gollan, Nora Cryns, Ina Monsef, Nicole Skoetz, Elke Kalbe","doi":"10.3233/JPD-230343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical exercise interventions are known to improve quality of life, motor and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cognitive outcomes are rare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical exercise intervention effects compared with passive and active control groups (CGs) on global cognition in people with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical exercise interventions in PD using nine databases. We included RCTs reporting global cognition outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (ten with passive, seven with active CGs) were included in the systematic review. Exercise interventions varied considerably between studies. The meta-analysis included nine studies with 236 people with PD (seven with passive, two with active CGs). The SMD was 0.33 (95% CI 0.00; 0.65) demonstrating a small effect (p = 0.05) in favor of physical exercise. Compared with passive CGs, physical exercise had a small non-significant effect (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.14;0.58, p = 0.24). Compared with active CGs, physical exercise had a medium significant effect (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI 0.12;1.33, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical exercise may increase global cognition in people with PD, but the evidence is very uncertain. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm this finding and to identify the most effective type of physical exercise for improving cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"S115-S133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-230343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical exercise interventions are known to improve quality of life, motor and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cognitive outcomes are rare.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical exercise intervention effects compared with passive and active control groups (CGs) on global cognition in people with PD.

Methods: A literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical exercise interventions in PD using nine databases. We included RCTs reporting global cognition outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Seventeen studies (ten with passive, seven with active CGs) were included in the systematic review. Exercise interventions varied considerably between studies. The meta-analysis included nine studies with 236 people with PD (seven with passive, two with active CGs). The SMD was 0.33 (95% CI 0.00; 0.65) demonstrating a small effect (p = 0.05) in favor of physical exercise. Compared with passive CGs, physical exercise had a small non-significant effect (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.14;0.58, p = 0.24). Compared with active CGs, physical exercise had a medium significant effect (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI 0.12;1.33, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Physical exercise may increase global cognition in people with PD, but the evidence is very uncertain. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm this finding and to identify the most effective type of physical exercise for improving cognition.

体育锻炼能否被视为帕金森病患者全面认知能力的有效增强剂?系统综述和元分析结果。
背景:众所周知,体育锻炼干预可改善帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量、运动和非运动症状。然而,有关认知结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析却很少见:与被动和主动对照组(CGs)相比,对帕金森病患者的全面认知进行体育锻炼干预效果的系统回顾和荟萃分析:我们使用九个数据库对有关体育锻炼干预帕金森病的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了文献检索。我们纳入了报告总体认知结果的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型和标准化均值差异(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)进行了荟萃分析。采用修订后的 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对偏倚进行评估,并采用 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行评级:17项研究(10项为被动CG,7项为主动CG)被纳入系统综述。不同研究的运动干预措施差异很大。荟萃分析包括九项研究,共涉及 236 名帕金森病患者(七项为被动式,两项为主动式 CGs)。SMD为0.33 (95% CI 0.00; 0.65),表明体育锻炼的效果较小(P = 0.05)。与被动式心电图相比,体育锻炼的影响较小(SMD = 0.22,95% CI -0.14;0.58,p = 0.24)。与主动型 CGs 相比,体育锻炼具有中等显著效果(SMD = 0.72,95% CI 0.12;1.33,p = 0.02):体育锻炼可能会提高帕金森病患者的整体认知能力,但证据还很不确定。需要进一步开展大规模的研究性试验来证实这一发现,并确定对改善认知最有效的体育锻炼类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信