Molecular identification, risk factor assessment, and phylogenetic analysis of tick-borne pathogens in symptomatic and asymptomatic cattle from South-Eastern Iran.

IF 1.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Experimental and Applied Acarology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10493-023-00886-0
Atefeh Fathi, Reza Nabavi, Vahid Noaman, Ali Sarani, Dariush Saadati, Mourad Ben Said, Abdul Ghafar, Abdul Jabbar, Alireza Sazmand
{"title":"Molecular identification, risk factor assessment, and phylogenetic analysis of tick-borne pathogens in symptomatic and asymptomatic cattle from South-Eastern Iran.","authors":"Atefeh Fathi, Reza Nabavi, Vahid Noaman, Ali Sarani, Dariush Saadati, Mourad Ben Said, Abdul Ghafar, Abdul Jabbar, Alireza Sazmand","doi":"10.1007/s10493-023-00886-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) represent a substantial threat to cattle globally, exerting adverse impacts on production, health, and economic viability. This study delves into the prevalence and implications of TTBPs in cattle sourced from resource-limited smallholder livestock farms situated in southeastern Iran, proximate to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Blood and tick specimens were systematically collected from a cohort of 230 cattle, comprising 150 asymptomatic and 80 symptomatic individuals. Genomic DNA isolated from blood samples underwent rigorous examination for the presence of key TBPs, including Anaplasma marginale, A. phagocytophilum, A. bovis, A. centrale, Babesia bigemina, and Theileria annulata, utilizing multiple genetic markers. Nucleotide sequence analysis facilitated the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships. The study also evaluated various potential risk factors, such as clinical status, gender, age, breed, tick infestation, and management practices, to elucidate their associations with TTBPs. Among the cattle cohort, a staggering 87.8% (202/230) tested positive for at least one pathogen. Prevalence statistics encompassed A. marginale (72.2%), T. annulata (68.3%), A. phagocytophilum/A. platys-like complex (66.1%), A. centrale (16.7%), B. bigemina (10.0%), and A. bovis (6.1%). Remarkably, mixed infections involving two, three, and four pathogens were detected in 23%, 52.1%, and 2.2% of animals, respectively. Notably, all asymptomatic cattle were positive for at least one TBP. Tick infestation was observed in 62.2% (143/230) of cattle, predominantly caused by Hyalomma anatolicum (82.5%), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (13.1%), and R. sanguineus sensu lato (4.4%). Risk factors linked to TBPs encompassed tick infestation, older age, and crossbred animals. Clinical presentations among symptomatic cattle encompassed fever, anemia, weight loss, anorexia, jaundice, and enlarged superficial lymph nodes. This study underscores the pivotal role of asymptomatic carriers in the propagation of TTBPs within endemic regions. Furthermore, it emphasizes the potential for the implementation of molecular diagnostics to unmask subclinical infections, thereby affording the opportunity for targeted interventions aimed at ameliorating the burden of TTBPs in resource-constrained smallholder dairy farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12088,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","volume":" ","pages":"479-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-023-00886-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) represent a substantial threat to cattle globally, exerting adverse impacts on production, health, and economic viability. This study delves into the prevalence and implications of TTBPs in cattle sourced from resource-limited smallholder livestock farms situated in southeastern Iran, proximate to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Blood and tick specimens were systematically collected from a cohort of 230 cattle, comprising 150 asymptomatic and 80 symptomatic individuals. Genomic DNA isolated from blood samples underwent rigorous examination for the presence of key TBPs, including Anaplasma marginale, A. phagocytophilum, A. bovis, A. centrale, Babesia bigemina, and Theileria annulata, utilizing multiple genetic markers. Nucleotide sequence analysis facilitated the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships. The study also evaluated various potential risk factors, such as clinical status, gender, age, breed, tick infestation, and management practices, to elucidate their associations with TTBPs. Among the cattle cohort, a staggering 87.8% (202/230) tested positive for at least one pathogen. Prevalence statistics encompassed A. marginale (72.2%), T. annulata (68.3%), A. phagocytophilum/A. platys-like complex (66.1%), A. centrale (16.7%), B. bigemina (10.0%), and A. bovis (6.1%). Remarkably, mixed infections involving two, three, and four pathogens were detected in 23%, 52.1%, and 2.2% of animals, respectively. Notably, all asymptomatic cattle were positive for at least one TBP. Tick infestation was observed in 62.2% (143/230) of cattle, predominantly caused by Hyalomma anatolicum (82.5%), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (13.1%), and R. sanguineus sensu lato (4.4%). Risk factors linked to TBPs encompassed tick infestation, older age, and crossbred animals. Clinical presentations among symptomatic cattle encompassed fever, anemia, weight loss, anorexia, jaundice, and enlarged superficial lymph nodes. This study underscores the pivotal role of asymptomatic carriers in the propagation of TTBPs within endemic regions. Furthermore, it emphasizes the potential for the implementation of molecular diagnostics to unmask subclinical infections, thereby affording the opportunity for targeted interventions aimed at ameliorating the burden of TTBPs in resource-constrained smallholder dairy farms.

Abstract Image

伊朗东南部有症状和无症状牛体内蜱媒病原体的分子鉴定、风险因素评估和系统发育分析。
蜱传病原体(TBPs)对全球的牛构成了巨大威胁,对牛的生产、健康和经济生存能力产生了不利影响。本研究探讨了 TTBPs 在伊朗东南部靠近阿富汗和巴基斯坦、资源有限的小农畜牧场的牛群中的流行情况及其影响。我们系统地收集了 230 头牛的血液和蜱标本,其中 150 头无症状,80 头有症状。从血液样本中分离出的基因组 DNA 经过严格检测,利用多种遗传标记检测是否存在主要的 TBPs,包括边缘疟原虫(Anaplasma marginale)、噬细胞嗜血杆菌(A. phagocytophilum)、牛疟原虫(A. bovis)、中心疟原虫(A. centrale)、大疟原虫(Babesia bigemina)和环状疟原虫(Theileria annulata)。核苷酸序列分析有助于重建系统发育关系。研究还评估了各种潜在的风险因素,如临床状况、性别、年龄、品种、蜱虫侵扰和管理方法,以阐明它们与 TTBPs 的关系。在牛群中,至少有一种病原体检测呈阳性的比例高达 87.8%(202/230)。流行率统计包括:A. marginale (72.2%)、T. annulata (68.3%)、A. phagocytophilum/A. platys-like complex (66.1%)、A. centrale (16.7%)、B. bigemina (10.0%) 和 A. bovis (6.1%)。值得注意的是,在 23%、52.1% 和 2.2% 的动物中分别发现了涉及两种、三种和四种病原体的混合感染。值得注意的是,所有无症状的牛至少有一种 TBP 呈阳性。在 62.2% 的牛(143/230 头)中观察到蜱虫感染,主要由 Hyalomma anatolicum(82.5%)、Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus(13.1%)和 R. sanguineus sensu lato(4.4%)引起。与 TBPs 相关的风险因素包括蜱虫侵扰、年龄较大和杂交动物。有症状的牛的临床表现包括发烧、贫血、体重减轻、厌食、黄疸和浅表淋巴结肿大。这项研究强调了无症状携带者在 TTBPs 流行区内传播过程中的关键作用。此外,该研究还强调了采用分子诊断揭示亚临床感染的潜力,从而为采取有针对性的干预措施提供了机会,以减轻资源有限的小农奶牛场的 TTBPs 负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Applied Acarology publishes peer-reviewed original papers describing advances in basic and applied research on mites and ticks. Coverage encompasses all Acari, including those of environmental, agricultural, medical and veterinary importance, and all the ways in which they interact with other organisms (plants, arthropods and other animals). The subject matter draws upon a wide variety of disciplines, including evolutionary biology, ecology, epidemiology, physiology, biochemistry, toxicology, immunology, genetics, molecular biology and pest management sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信