Effects of different cryopreservation parameters on the differences between trypan blue and fluorescent SYTO 13/GelRed assays

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Elham Ashrafi , Dominic Sauvageau , Janet A.W. Elliott
{"title":"Effects of different cryopreservation parameters on the differences between trypan blue and fluorescent SYTO 13/GelRed assays","authors":"Elham Ashrafi ,&nbsp;Dominic Sauvageau ,&nbsp;Janet A.W. Elliott","doi":"10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post-thaw cell viability assessment is very important in cryopreservation because it is the main assessment method used to optimize cryopreservation protocols for each cell type; hence, having standardized accurate, quick, and reliable assays for post-thaw cell viability measurements is of utmost importance. The trypan blue exclusion assay and nucleic-acid-binding fluorescence-based assays are two different methods for cell viability assessment. Both assays identify cells with damaged membranes by whether they let a compound enter the cell. In this study, these two assays are compared in the context of cryopreservation and the impacts of important cryopreservation parameters on the differences in measurements are investigated. H9c2 myoblasts were cryopreserved with different freezing protocols. Cell membrane integrities were measured immediately after thaw as well as after cryoprotectant removal by a hemocytometer-based trypan blue dye exclusion assay and a dual fluorometric SYTO 13/GelRed assay; and the results were compared. This study quantifies how (<em>i</em>) the absence or presence of different cryoprotectants, (<em>ii</em>) different cell–cryoprotectant incubation conditions, and (<em>iii</em>) the presence or removal of cryoprotectants after thaw affect the differences between these two viability assays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011224024000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-thaw cell viability assessment is very important in cryopreservation because it is the main assessment method used to optimize cryopreservation protocols for each cell type; hence, having standardized accurate, quick, and reliable assays for post-thaw cell viability measurements is of utmost importance. The trypan blue exclusion assay and nucleic-acid-binding fluorescence-based assays are two different methods for cell viability assessment. Both assays identify cells with damaged membranes by whether they let a compound enter the cell. In this study, these two assays are compared in the context of cryopreservation and the impacts of important cryopreservation parameters on the differences in measurements are investigated. H9c2 myoblasts were cryopreserved with different freezing protocols. Cell membrane integrities were measured immediately after thaw as well as after cryoprotectant removal by a hemocytometer-based trypan blue dye exclusion assay and a dual fluorometric SYTO 13/GelRed assay; and the results were compared. This study quantifies how (i) the absence or presence of different cryoprotectants, (ii) different cell–cryoprotectant incubation conditions, and (iii) the presence or removal of cryoprotectants after thaw affect the differences between these two viability assays.

不同冷冻保存参数对锥虫蓝和荧光 SYTO 13/GelRed 检测差异的影响。
解冻后细胞存活率评估在冷冻保存中非常重要,因为它是用于优化每种细胞类型的冷冻保存方案的主要评估方法;因此,拥有准确、快速、可靠的解冻后细胞存活率标准化检测方法至关重要。胰蓝排除测定法和基于核酸结合的荧光测定法是两种不同的细胞活力评估方法。这两种检测方法都是通过细胞膜是否允许化合物进入细胞来确定细胞膜是否受损。在本研究中,我们结合低温保存对这两种检测方法进行了比较,并研究了重要的低温保存参数对测量结果差异的影响。H9c2 肌母细胞采用不同的冷冻方案进行冷冻保存。通过基于血细胞计数器的胰蓝染料排阻测定法和 SYTO 13/GelRed 双荧光测定法测量解冻后立即以及去除冷冻保护剂后的细胞膜整合度,并对结果进行比较。本研究量化了 i) 不同冷冻保护剂的存在与否;ii) 不同细胞-冷冻保护剂孵育条件;iii) 解冻后冷冻保护剂的存在与去除如何影响这两种活力测定法之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信