State of the Science: LGBTQ-Affirmative Psychotherapy

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"State of the Science: LGBTQ-Affirmative Psychotherapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals experience significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and behavioral comorbidities (i.e., substance use, suicide) compared to heterosexual and cisgender individuals. LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy aims to ameliorate the adverse psychosocial processes, ultimately caused by stigma, that underlie this disparity. Over the past two decades, the mental health field has introduced professional guidelines and treatment protocols for LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, and established their efficacy across distinct SGM populations, delivery modalities, and settings. This state of the science review outlines the history, current evidence, and future directions of LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy. It provides an historical account of clinically relevant research for SGM populations and outlines the factors that moved the field from pathologizing perspectives to affirmative approaches. It then discusses the current evidence for LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, as well as studies identifying treatment moderators, including race/ethnicity and stigma exposure, as well as potential treatment mechanisms, including hypervigilance, shame, negative self-schemas, unassertiveness, and emotion dysregulation. SGM individuals can only benefit from LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy if protocols are widely available and used by therapists. To this end, the article presents current findings on implementation and dissemination, such as therapist training, and different treatment delivery modalities. Finally, the article outlines an agenda for future research to advance the field of LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, including identifying treatment mechanisms, successfully implementing and disseminating treatment protocols, determining which contexts and client characteristics warrant adaptations to current protocols, and understanding how LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy can interact with structural and systemic conditions to exert the strongest possible impact on SGM mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals experience significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and behavioral comorbidities (i.e., substance use, suicide) compared to heterosexual and cisgender individuals. LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy aims to ameliorate the adverse psychosocial processes, ultimately caused by stigma, that underlie this disparity. Over the past two decades, the mental health field has introduced professional guidelines and treatment protocols for LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, and established their efficacy across distinct SGM populations, delivery modalities, and settings. This state of the science review outlines the history, current evidence, and future directions of LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy. It provides an historical account of clinically relevant research for SGM populations and outlines the factors that moved the field from pathologizing perspectives to affirmative approaches. It then discusses the current evidence for LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, as well as studies identifying treatment moderators, including race/ethnicity and stigma exposure, as well as potential treatment mechanisms, including hypervigilance, shame, negative self-schemas, unassertiveness, and emotion dysregulation. SGM individuals can only benefit from LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy if protocols are widely available and used by therapists. To this end, the article presents current findings on implementation and dissemination, such as therapist training, and different treatment delivery modalities. Finally, the article outlines an agenda for future research to advance the field of LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy, including identifying treatment mechanisms, successfully implementing and disseminating treatment protocols, determining which contexts and client characteristics warrant adaptations to current protocols, and understanding how LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy can interact with structural and systemic conditions to exert the strongest possible impact on SGM mental health.
科学现状:支持 LGBTQ 的心理疗法
与异性恋和同性性别者相比,性与性别少数群体(SGM)的抑郁、焦虑和行为合并症(如药物使用、自杀)水平要高得多。LGBTQ 平权心理疗法旨在改善最终由污名化导致的不良社会心理过程,而污名化正是这种差异的根源。在过去的二十年里,心理健康领域已经推出了 LGBTQ 平权心理疗法的专业指南和治疗方案,并在不同的 SGM 群体、治疗方式和环境中确立了其疗效。这篇科学现状综述概述了 LGBTQ 平权心理疗法的历史、现有证据和未来发展方向。它介绍了针对 SGM 群体的临床相关研究的历史,并概述了该领域从病理学观点转向肯定性方法的因素。然后,它讨论了 LGBTQ 平权心理疗法的当前证据,以及确定治疗调节因素(包括种族/族裔和污名化暴露)和潜在治疗机制(包括过度警觉、羞耻感、消极自我模式、不主动性和情绪失调)的研究。只有在治疗师广泛提供和使用相关方案的情况下,SGM 患者才能从 LGBTQ 平权心理治疗中获益。为此,文章介绍了目前在实施和推广方面的研究成果,如治疗师培训和不同的治疗方式。最后,文章概述了推进 LGBTQ 平权心理疗法领域的未来研究议程,包括确定治疗机制、成功实施和推广治疗方案、确定哪些情况和客户特征需要对当前方案进行调整,以及了解 LGBTQ 平权心理疗法如何与结构性和系统性条件相互作用,从而对 SGM 心理健康产生尽可能大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信