Associations of resistance training levels with low muscle mass: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Korea

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jae Ho Park, Nam-Kyoo Lim, Hyun-Young Park
{"title":"Associations of resistance training levels with low muscle mass: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Korea","authors":"Jae Ho Park, Nam-Kyoo Lim, Hyun-Young Park","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00339-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low muscle mass is associated with adverse health outcomes such as functional decline and all-cause mortality. This study investigated the relationship between the risk of low muscle mass and the training period and/or frequency of resistance training (RT). We included 126,339 participants (81,263 women) from nationwide cohorts in Korea. Low muscle mass was defined based on the fat-free mass index. To investigate the presence of an inverse dose–response relationship between RT levels and the risk of low muscle mass, the training period (months) and frequency (per week) of RT were used. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the risk of low muscle mass according to the RT levels. Prevalence rates for low muscle mass in our study population were 21.27% and 6.92% in men and women, respectively. When compared with not performing RT, performing RT for 3–4 days/week and ≥5 days/week decreased the risk of low muscle mass by 22% and 27%, respectively, and performing RT for 12–23 months and ≥24 months decreased the risk by 19% and 41%, respectively. When simultaneously considering both training period and frequency, performing RT for either 3–4 days/week or ≥5 days/week was significantly related to risk reduction, provided that the training period was at least 1 year. Importantly, performing RT for more than 2 years resulted in an additional risk reduction. However, there was no additional effect of performing RT for ≥5 days/week compared to 3–4 days/week, regardless of whether the RT duration was 1–2 years or more than 2 years. Since performing RT for 5 days/week or more did not yield any additional effects on the risk of low muscle mass, performing RT for 3–4 days/week was sufficient to prevent low muscle mass. The effectiveness of this preventive measure can be further enhanced by engaging in long-term RT, specifically for more than 2 years.","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00339-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low muscle mass is associated with adverse health outcomes such as functional decline and all-cause mortality. This study investigated the relationship between the risk of low muscle mass and the training period and/or frequency of resistance training (RT). We included 126,339 participants (81,263 women) from nationwide cohorts in Korea. Low muscle mass was defined based on the fat-free mass index. To investigate the presence of an inverse dose–response relationship between RT levels and the risk of low muscle mass, the training period (months) and frequency (per week) of RT were used. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the risk of low muscle mass according to the RT levels. Prevalence rates for low muscle mass in our study population were 21.27% and 6.92% in men and women, respectively. When compared with not performing RT, performing RT for 3–4 days/week and ≥5 days/week decreased the risk of low muscle mass by 22% and 27%, respectively, and performing RT for 12–23 months and ≥24 months decreased the risk by 19% and 41%, respectively. When simultaneously considering both training period and frequency, performing RT for either 3–4 days/week or ≥5 days/week was significantly related to risk reduction, provided that the training period was at least 1 year. Importantly, performing RT for more than 2 years resulted in an additional risk reduction. However, there was no additional effect of performing RT for ≥5 days/week compared to 3–4 days/week, regardless of whether the RT duration was 1–2 years or more than 2 years. Since performing RT for 5 days/week or more did not yield any additional effects on the risk of low muscle mass, performing RT for 3–4 days/week was sufficient to prevent low muscle mass. The effectiveness of this preventive measure can be further enhanced by engaging in long-term RT, specifically for more than 2 years.
阻力训练水平与低肌肉质量的关系:韩国一项全国性横断面研究
肌肉质量低与机能下降和全因死亡率等不良健康后果有关。本研究调查了低肌肉质量风险与阻力训练(RT)的训练时间和/或频率之间的关系。我们纳入了韩国全国性队列中的 126,339 名参与者(81,263 名女性)。低肌肉质量的定义基于去脂质量指数。为了研究 RT 水平与低肌肉质量风险之间是否存在剂量-反应反比关系,我们使用了 RT 的训练周期(月)和频率(每周)。采用多元逻辑回归模型,根据 RT 水平评估低肌肉质量的风险。在我们的研究人群中,男性和女性的低肌肉质量患病率分别为 21.27% 和 6.92%。与不进行 RT 相比,进行 3-4 天/周和≥5 天/周的 RT 可使低肌肉质量风险分别降低 22% 和 27%,进行 12-23 个月和≥24 个月的 RT 可使低肌肉质量风险分别降低 19% 和 41%。同时考虑训练时间和频率时,如果训练时间至少为一年,那么每周进行3-4天或每周≥5天的RT训练与风险降低有显著关系。重要的是,进行 RT 超过 2 年还能进一步降低风险。然而,与 3-4 天/周相比,无论 RT 持续时间是 1-2 年还是 2 年以上,RT ≥5 天/周都没有额外的效果。由于进行 5 天/周或更长时间的 RT 对低肌肉质量风险没有产生任何额外影响,因此进行 3-4 天/周的 RT 足以预防低肌肉质量。长期(尤其是 2 年以上)进行 RT 可以进一步提高这一预防措施的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信