{"title":"Influence of musculoskeletal pain during gait on kinematics and selective motor control in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy: A pilot study","authors":"Gilad Sorek , Marije Goudriaan , Itai Schurr , Simon-Henri Schless","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with cerebral-palsy commonly present with altered kinematics and selective-motor-control during gait, and may also experience musculoskeletal pain. This pilot study aims to investigate if the immediate experience of musculoskeletal pain during gait influences kinematics and selective-motor-control in individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective treadmill-based gait-analysis data for 145 individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy were screened. Participants were asked about experiencing lower-extremity musculoskeletal pain immediately during gait, with 26 individuals (18%) reporting this was the case (pain-group; mean 11.55 ± 3.15 years, Gross-Motor-Function-Classification-System levels I/II/III <em>n</em> = 5/13/8, Uni/bilateral involvement <em>n</em> = 11/15). Of the 77 individuals who did not report any pain, a no-pain group (<em>n</em> = 26) was individually matched. Kinematics were evaluated using the Gait-Profile-Score and spatiotemporal parameters (dimensionless-walking-speed, single-leg-support percentage and step-time). Selective-motor-control was assessed using the Walking-Dynamic-Motor-Control index.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In the pain-group, 58% reported experiencing pain in their more-involved leg, 8% in the less-involved leg and 34% in both legs. Regarding the pain location, 38% of the pain-group reported experiencing pain in multiple locations. On a more specific level, 35%, 46% and 54% reported pain around the hip/thigh, knee/calf and ankle/ft, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the pain and no-pain groups for any of the outcome measures, in each leg or bilaterally.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>No significant differences in kinematics and selective-motor-control during gait were found between individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy, with and without musculoskeletal pain. This suggests that the individuals in this study may not present with obvious antalgic gait patterns, which may relate to the pre-existing altered kinematics and selective-motor-control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individuals with cerebral-palsy commonly present with altered kinematics and selective-motor-control during gait, and may also experience musculoskeletal pain. This pilot study aims to investigate if the immediate experience of musculoskeletal pain during gait influences kinematics and selective-motor-control in individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy.
Methods
Retrospective treadmill-based gait-analysis data for 145 individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy were screened. Participants were asked about experiencing lower-extremity musculoskeletal pain immediately during gait, with 26 individuals (18%) reporting this was the case (pain-group; mean 11.55 ± 3.15 years, Gross-Motor-Function-Classification-System levels I/II/III n = 5/13/8, Uni/bilateral involvement n = 11/15). Of the 77 individuals who did not report any pain, a no-pain group (n = 26) was individually matched. Kinematics were evaluated using the Gait-Profile-Score and spatiotemporal parameters (dimensionless-walking-speed, single-leg-support percentage and step-time). Selective-motor-control was assessed using the Walking-Dynamic-Motor-Control index.
Findings
In the pain-group, 58% reported experiencing pain in their more-involved leg, 8% in the less-involved leg and 34% in both legs. Regarding the pain location, 38% of the pain-group reported experiencing pain in multiple locations. On a more specific level, 35%, 46% and 54% reported pain around the hip/thigh, knee/calf and ankle/ft, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the pain and no-pain groups for any of the outcome measures, in each leg or bilaterally.
Interpretation
No significant differences in kinematics and selective-motor-control during gait were found between individuals with spastic cerebral-palsy, with and without musculoskeletal pain. This suggests that the individuals in this study may not present with obvious antalgic gait patterns, which may relate to the pre-existing altered kinematics and selective-motor-control.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.