Embedded information literacy interventions in an experiential business learning capstone

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Judy Opdahl
{"title":"Embedded information literacy interventions in an experiential business learning capstone","authors":"Judy Opdahl","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This case study shares an evolving embedded librarian approach to support an experiential undergraduate business learning capstone. To improve research conducted by student teams as they completed semester-long sponsored projects, an electronic research planning form and research consultation were embedded in the course. To measure student experience and self-reported learning from the required interventions a Qualtrics survey was administered. Two matrix-based questions with four statements employed a 5-point Likert scale to measure levels of agreement or disagreement on student experience and learning with the interventions. Results to Matrix 1 found overall positive responses to questions about student experiences with completing a research plan with the most positive response that it helped student teams consider gaps in their knowledge that they needed to address with research. Results to Matrix 2 questions also indicated positive responses to questions about the research consultation with the most positive response being that students more confident in their ability to connect research to a business need based on their experience with the research consultation with the librarian. Responses to an open-ended survey question about student learning and experience from the research plan and research consultation were exported into Atlas.ti and an inductive approach was used to code the data identifying themes. Most often reported by students were learning databases, new resources, search strategies, and application of information to their projects. This study adds to the literature on information literacy and embedded practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000211/pdfft?md5=29c3955e228987c0d4e021b776d0b000&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000211-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study shares an evolving embedded librarian approach to support an experiential undergraduate business learning capstone. To improve research conducted by student teams as they completed semester-long sponsored projects, an electronic research planning form and research consultation were embedded in the course. To measure student experience and self-reported learning from the required interventions a Qualtrics survey was administered. Two matrix-based questions with four statements employed a 5-point Likert scale to measure levels of agreement or disagreement on student experience and learning with the interventions. Results to Matrix 1 found overall positive responses to questions about student experiences with completing a research plan with the most positive response that it helped student teams consider gaps in their knowledge that they needed to address with research. Results to Matrix 2 questions also indicated positive responses to questions about the research consultation with the most positive response being that students more confident in their ability to connect research to a business need based on their experience with the research consultation with the librarian. Responses to an open-ended survey question about student learning and experience from the research plan and research consultation were exported into Atlas.ti and an inductive approach was used to code the data identifying themes. Most often reported by students were learning databases, new resources, search strategies, and application of information to their projects. This study adds to the literature on information literacy and embedded practices.

在体验式商业学习毕业设计中嵌入信息扫盲干预措施
本案例研究分享了一种不断发展的嵌入式图书馆员方法,以支持本科生商业学习的顶点体验。为了改进学生团队在完成学期赞助项目时开展的研究,在课程中嵌入了电子研究规划表和研究咨询。为了衡量学生从所需干预措施中获得的经验和自我报告的学习情况,我们进行了一项 Qualtrics 调查。两个基于矩阵的问题包含四个陈述,采用 5 点李克特量表来衡量学生对干预措施的体验和学习的同意或不同意程度。矩阵 1 的结果显示,学生对有关完成研究计划的经验问题的回答总体上是积极的,其中最积极的回答是,这有助于学生团队考虑他们需要通过研究来解决的知识差距。矩阵 2 问题的结果也表明,学生对研究咨询问题的回答是积极的,其中最积极的回答是,根据他们与图书管理员进行研究咨询的经验,学生对自己将研究与业务需求联系起来的能力更有信心。关于学生从研究计划和研究咨询中学到的知识和经验的开放式调查问题的答复被导出到 Atlas.ti,并使用归纳法对数据进行编码,以确定主题。学生报告最多的主题是学习数据库、新资源、搜索策略以及将信息应用到他们的项目中。这项研究为有关信息素养和嵌入式实践的文献增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信