The potential diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs for Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis

W.T. Zhang , G.X. Zhang , S.S. Gao
{"title":"The potential diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs for Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis","authors":"W.T. Zhang ,&nbsp;G.X. Zhang ,&nbsp;S.S. Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; objective</h3><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disease that seriously affects cognitive ability and has become a key public health problem. Many studies have identified the possibility of peripheral blood microRNA as effective non-invasive biomarkers for AD diagnosis, but the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs in the diagnosis of AD patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic literature search of the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, updated to March 15, 2021. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity, and Deeks’ funnel plot was used to assess whether there was publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>62 studies from 18 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.85), specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76–0.83), PLR was 4. 1 (95% CI: 3.4–4.9), NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.19–0.28), DOR was 18 (95% CI: 13–25) and AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90). Subgroup analysis shows that the microRNA clusters of plasma type performed a better diagnostic accuracy of AD patients. In addition, publication bias was not found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Circulating microRNAs can be used as a promising non-invasive biomarker in AD diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000792/pdfft?md5=43921deb7f655d4aa413c1b82556403d&pid=1-s2.0-S2173580823000792-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objective

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disease that seriously affects cognitive ability and has become a key public health problem. Many studies have identified the possibility of peripheral blood microRNA as effective non-invasive biomarkers for AD diagnosis, but the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs in the diagnosis of AD patients.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, updated to March 15, 2021. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity, and Deeks’ funnel plot was used to assess whether there was publication bias.

Results

62 studies from 18 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.85), specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76–0.83), PLR was 4. 1 (95% CI: 3.4–4.9), NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.19–0.28), DOR was 18 (95% CI: 13–25) and AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90). Subgroup analysis shows that the microRNA clusters of plasma type performed a better diagnostic accuracy of AD patients. In addition, publication bias was not found.

Conclusions

Circulating microRNAs can be used as a promising non-invasive biomarker in AD diagnosis.

循环微RNA对阿尔茨海默病的潜在诊断准确性:荟萃分析
背景& 目标阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性、不可逆的神经退行性疾病,严重影响认知能力,已成为一个重要的公共卫生问题。许多研究发现外周血微RNA可能是诊断AD的有效非侵入性生物标志物,但结果并不一致。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估循环 microRNA 在诊断 AD 患者中的诊断准确性:我们对以下数据库进行了系统的文献检索:PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、万方数据库和中国国家知识基础设施(更新至 2021 年 3 月 15 日)。采用随机效应模型对灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断几率比和曲线下面积进行汇总。进行了元回归和亚组分析以探索异质性的来源,并使用迪克斯漏斗图评估是否存在发表偏倚。汇总灵敏度为 0.82(95% CI:0.78-0.85),特异性为 0.80(95% CI:0.76-0.83),PLR 为 4.1(95% CI:3.4-4.9),NLR 为 0.23(95% CI:0.19-0.28),DOR 为 18(95% CI:13-25),AUC 为 0.88(95% CI:0.84-0.90)。亚组分析表明,血浆型微RNA群对AD患者的诊断准确率更高。结论循环微RNA可作为诊断AD的一种前景看好的非侵入性生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信