Tomohiro Ide, Tyler J Hamer, Adam B Rosen, Colleen Vogel, Dimitri Haan, Brian A Knarr, Samuel J Wilkins
{"title":"Limited Total Arc Glenohumeral Rotation and Shoulder Biomechanics During Baseball Pitching.","authors":"Tomohiro Ide, Tyler J Hamer, Adam B Rosen, Colleen Vogel, Dimitri Haan, Brian A Knarr, Samuel J Wilkins","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0565.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Upper extremity injuries in baseball pitchers cause significant time loss from competing and decreased quality of life. Although shoulder range of motion (ROM) is reported as a key factor to prevent potential injury, it remains unclear how limited glenohumeral ROM affects pitching biomechanics which may contribute to upper extremity injuries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate how pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM of the throwing arm differed in upper extremity pitching kinematics and kinetics as well as ball velocity compared with pitchers with greater levels of glenohumeral ROM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Fifty-seven baseball pitchers (ages 18-24) were divided into either control (≥160° total arc) or lower ROM (<160° total arc) groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The mean glenohumeral ROM deficits, pitching kinematic and kinetic outcomes, and ball velocity were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group demonstrated significantly less deficit in total arc ROM between arms than the lower ROM (control: -1.5° ± 10.0°; lower ROM: -12.4° ± 13.9°; P < .001). While the lower ROM group displayed less maximal shoulder external rotation (ER) while pitching, the control group had significantly less difference in ROM between maximal shoulder ER while pitching and clinically measured ER (lower ROM: 64.4° ± 12.1°; control: 55.8° ± 16.6°; P = .025). The control group had significantly faster ball velocity than the lower ROM group (control: 85.0 ± 4.3 mph; lower ROM: 82.4 ± 4.8 mph; P = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM (<160° total arc) may undergo overstretching toward ER in the shoulder during the late cocking phase. Pitchers with higher total arc ROM can pitch the same or faster ball without increasing loading in the upper extremity. Total arc glenohumeral ROM measurement can be a clinical screening tool to monitor shoulder condition over the time, and pitchers with limited total arc ROM might be at higher risk of shoulder injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"997-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0565.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Upper extremity injuries in baseball pitchers cause significant time loss from competing and decreased quality of life. Although shoulder range of motion (ROM) is reported as a key factor to prevent potential injury, it remains unclear how limited glenohumeral ROM affects pitching biomechanics which may contribute to upper extremity injuries.
Objective: To investigate how pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM of the throwing arm differed in upper extremity pitching kinematics and kinetics as well as ball velocity compared with pitchers with greater levels of glenohumeral ROM.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Laboratory.
Patients or other participants: Fifty-seven baseball pitchers (ages 18-24) were divided into either control (≥160° total arc) or lower ROM (<160° total arc) groups.
Main outcome measure(s): The mean glenohumeral ROM deficits, pitching kinematic and kinetic outcomes, and ball velocity were compared between groups.
Results: The control group demonstrated significantly less deficit in total arc ROM between arms than the lower ROM (control: -1.5° ± 10.0°; lower ROM: -12.4° ± 13.9°; P < .001). While the lower ROM group displayed less maximal shoulder external rotation (ER) while pitching, the control group had significantly less difference in ROM between maximal shoulder ER while pitching and clinically measured ER (lower ROM: 64.4° ± 12.1°; control: 55.8° ± 16.6°; P = .025). The control group had significantly faster ball velocity than the lower ROM group (control: 85.0 ± 4.3 mph; lower ROM: 82.4 ± 4.8 mph; P = .024).
Conclusion: Pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM (<160° total arc) may undergo overstretching toward ER in the shoulder during the late cocking phase. Pitchers with higher total arc ROM can pitch the same or faster ball without increasing loading in the upper extremity. Total arc glenohumeral ROM measurement can be a clinical screening tool to monitor shoulder condition over the time, and pitchers with limited total arc ROM might be at higher risk of shoulder injury.
背景:棒球投手的上肢损伤会导致大量的比赛时间损失和生活质量下降。尽管有报道称肩关节活动范围(ROM)是预防潜在损伤的关键因素,但目前仍不清楚有限的盂肱关节活动范围如何影响投球生物力学,从而可能导致上肢损伤:调查投掷臂盂肱总弧度ROM减少的投手与盂肱ROM水平较高的投手相比,在上肢投球运动学和动力学以及球速方面有何不同:设计:横断面研究:患者或其他参与者57名棒球投手(18-24岁)被分为对照组(总弧度≧160°)或较低ROM组(主要结果测量指标):比较各组的平均盂肱关节 ROM 缺陷、投球运动学和动力学结果以及球速:结果:对照组两臂间总弧度 ROM 的缺陷明显少于低 ROM 组(对照组:-1.5±10.0°,低 ROM 组:-12.4±13.9°,p):肱骨总弧度ROM下降的投球手(
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.